Let It Burn[Comments enabled] I simply no longer care.
The actions of the Senate are beyond reprehensible at this point. So are the actions of the USSC; Roberts and his Obamacare ruling, which was and remains blatantly unconstitutional (he re-wrote an unconstitutional fine into an unconstitutional direct tax, which nobody other than myself has pointed out for years despite it being black-letter in the Constitution!) should have been enough.
But I'm pretty tolerant, and had some hope.
I guess that's where this line came from..... it's real.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.But, at this point, we're there from my point of view.
No, I'm not reaching for a rifle. It's worse than that actually, which is what in my view you ought to think about long and hard.
You see, it's not worth spending my life on this nation; what the Founders gave and spilled both blood and fortune for no longer exists.
The latest Kavanaugh fiasco is exactly what I'm talking about. Avenetti (Stormy Daniels' lawyer) now is claiming that he has credible evidence that Kavanaugh and his buddies engaged in multiple, organized and premeditated gang rapes. Actual rapes -- not "well, we both got drunk and slept together and then one of us didn't like it the next morning" sort of accusations (which are damnable claims to get to the bottom of when everyone's an adult and imbibed freely on their own -- and were all smashed) but actual premeditated gang-rape setups where the allegation is that Kavanaugh and his friends intentionally drugged or got women drunk and then attacked them serially.
That is the sort of thing you do 100 years for -- if it's true -- and you should do 100 years, after being castrated with a pair of tin snips. And we're not talking about one event either; the claim is that there are multiple instances.
But here's the problem -- I'm supposed to believe the FBI did six background investigations of this guy during his career in public service over nearly 20 years and didn't find any evidence of any of this?