this is why we have to shoot the sons of bitches; 

 

There are moments when a society reveals just how far it has fallen. This is one of them. According to figures from Kent Police, a one-year-old baby girl was recorded as a crime suspect after allegedly causing a minor injury to another child. The same figures included 6 two-year-olds, 11 three-year-olds, and 20 four-year-olds. In what was once the nation that gave the world Magna Carta and the foundations of common law, police are now compiling crime statistics on babies.

Kent Police defended the practice by explaining that they want to understand what causes children to become involved in crime. We are not talking about teenagers. We are not talking about young adults. We are talking about toddlers and infants who, much like the Kent Police, have not yet developed the cognitive skills for advanced thought.......more........

 i quit fb when they started rewriting reality and removed posts i knew to be true but from their position to the left of me they couldn't allow reality a place; 

by Tyler Durden

Monday, Jun 22, 2026 - 08:05 PM

Authored by Patti Johnson via The Burning Platform blog,

That “black pill moment” is arriving faster than many realize. Not primarily through sweeping new government mandates, but through private companies quietly normalizing biometric data collection under the banners of “security,” “fraud prevention,” and “child protection.” They are erecting the infrastructure for a world where you cannot easily participate in daily life, commerce, or even basic online access without surrendering your face, your license scan, or other biometrics. Once the systems exist and the data flows, laws can simply ratify what private actors have already made routine.

In a recent commentary “Digital ID Black Pill Moment”, I highlighted a sobering reality: 186 out of 198 countries already have digital ID systems in place. Only a shrinking handful of nations lack foundational national digital IDs. As I wrote, “the global push for digital IDs is far advanced, likely past the point of no return, aligning with the UN’s 2030 goal of universal legal identity and enabling a globalist digital currency system that could control access to everything.”

Facebook/Meta: Selfie or Stay Locked Out

Government mandates are not required to finish building the digital surveillance prison. Citizens are willingly submitting their biometrics to access social media sites. For example, I am no longer on Facebook. They banned me during the Covid era after I began sharing information about the true contents of the shots and alternative treatments. A friend just sent me a Facebook post and I could not view it without taking a selfie and sending it to FB. No way was I going to comply.

Try viewing certain Facebook posts or recovering a flagged account, and you may hit this wall. Users are increasingly prompted to submit a video selfie turning their head in different directions so the system can map facial geometry to “prove you’re a real person” or restore access. The company states it uses this to combat scams and compromised accounts, and claims the video is deleted after verification........more...........

 an excellent question in this youtube short;

watch......... 

 free speech by country;

see.......... 

 a few educational images you might want to see; 

see......... 

 british police beat young girls;

see........... 

 canada bans history and the bible;

 

 Canada’s Bill C-9 has removed the “good faith religious expression defence” from convictions for criminal hate speech. It is now effectively, though not yet explicitly, illegal to quote the Bible or cite historical facts deemed contradictory to the Clown World narrative.

It is illegal under section 319(1) of the Criminal Code to publicly incite hatred by “communicating statements in any public place (that) incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace.”

It is also illegal under section 319(2) of the Criminal Code to communicate statements, “other than in private conversation” that “wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group,” and under 319(2.1) to wilfully promote antisemitism by “communicating statements, other than in private conversation… condoning, denying or downplaying the Holocaust.”

The penalties for these crimes are up to two years in prison.

The Supreme Court of Canada has defined hatred as the most extreme forms of the emotions described by vilification and detestation. The Court has said “detestation tend[s] to inspire enmity and extreme ill-will … which goes beyond mere disdain or dislike.” The Court has said vilification will “seek to abuse, denigrate or delegitimize (a group)… (or) render them lawless, dangerous, unworthy or unacceptable in the eyes of the audience.” The Court added that this type of speech “goes far beyond merely discrediting, humiliating or offending the victims.” The Court has not defined antisemitism.

The Court has also said that hatred can be identified by looking for “hallmarks of hatred” including speech that:............more...........