Monday, November 16, 2020

 this certainly looks like substantial evidence that the alzheimers patient stole the 'selection' from the orange man;

I’ve retrieved all of The New York Times‘ 2020 presidential datasets, which have a time-series of voting data from a company called Edison Research. Here, for instance, is Pennsylvania‘s.

What I found is pretty fascinating, especially in Pennsylvania.

An just one example, here is a graph depicting the shifts in votes starting on election day. The X-axis represents the change in votes (positive values represent shifts for Trump, negative values represent shifts for Biden.

May I call your attention to the differences between the left and the right sides of the graph?

Please note that after about 23:00 hours on 11/4/20 Zulu, that virtually all vote swings went for Biden.

But you need to see the data. Below is a spreadsheet with the running vote counts.

Trump’s vote count is in column C, Biden’s vote count is in column D. The change in Trump’s vote total from the prior count is in column E and Biden’s is in column F. Lastly, column G shows the difference in vote swings between columns E and F.

Do me a favor and scroll down until you start seeing the highlighted cells. Then scroll all the way down and tell me if that looks legit.

You’ll notice that after the 11/4/20 23:00Z cutoff time, only swings of Biden votes (in multiples of 6,000 at a time) seem to have been received.

Statistically, these changes make no sense. They’re not just improbable, they appear to be impossible.

I’ll have more info from other states — that show similar bizarre trends — shortly.

In the mean time, your thoughts are appreciated..........https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/11/15/the-new-york-times-pennsylvania-voting-data-seems-to-confirm-massive-vote-count-manipulation-for-biden/

No comments:

Post a Comment