Earlier parts of this intermittent series discussed NATO's projection and gaslighting.
Psychology Today defines confirmation bias as:
Once we have formed a view, we embrace information that confirms that view while ignoring, or rejecting, information that casts doubt on it. Confirmation bias suggests that we don’t perceive circumstances objectively. We pick out those bits of data that make us feel good because they confirm our prejudices. Thus, we may become prisoners of our assumptions.
Or, closer to the topic of this essay:
This quotation is from an interview of George Kennan by Thomas Friedman published
in the New York Times twenty years ago. He was speaking about what was
then called "NATO expansion" (later changed to the more anodyne – and
deceptive – phrase "NATO enlargement". (I as a civil servant in the
Canadian Department of National Defence used to amuse myself by seeing
if I could sneak the forbidden "expansion" – an altogether more honest
word – into briefing notes for the Higher Ups. As I recall, I got away
with it about half the time. A trivial pleasure in the evolving
disaster.).....https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/11/09/psychoanalysing-nato-confirmation-bias.html
No comments:
Post a Comment