On the 2nd October 2018 Jamal
Khashoggi entered the Saudi Arabian consulate in Istanbul, apparently
seeking documents in relation to his recent divorce. He has not been
seen since. The Saudis initially claimed he had left the consulate
alive. In the face of a steady leak of material from the Turkish
authorities they offered a variety of implausible explanations before
conceding that he was in fact dead.
The whereabouts of Khashoggi’s body, whole, dismembered or dissolved in acid, has not been disclosed.
What is now acknowledged as a brutal
murder of an exiled journalist was the basis of much outrage in the
western media. In the catalogue of Saudi atrocities in recent years, the
death of Khashoggi rates rather low, but that did not stop the barrage
of criticism directed at Saudi Arabia in general and its effective
political leader Mohammad bin Salman (MbS) in particular.
In recent days, more details have
emerged about the surrounding circumstances of the murder, including the
fact that the United Kingdom government knew in advance what the Saudis
planned for Khashoggi but failed to warn him. They were unlikely to
have been the only intelligence agency privy to Saudi plans.
His death therefore, and the furore
surrounding it, has therefore to be seen as part of a wider geopolitical
scenario. Khashoggi’s death, as unfortunate and as brutal as it was,
can be seen as a pawn in the greater game.
To understand what that game was, it is
necessary to go back to when MbS became the heir apparent and began his
political program. There were token gestures that attracted western
media attention, such as permitting women to drive. They were however, a
smoke screen for much more significant geopolitical moves, none of
which would have endeared him to the Americans and their allies.
The Saudi economy relies almost
exclusively on the sale of oil, and that commodity is not only being
depleted, it is also inextricably tied to the United States dollar. This
has been the case since the early 1970s when the Nixon administration
offered US ‘protection’ in exchange for all oil sales being denominated
in US dollars.
For decades, that arrangement served the
Saudis (and the Americans) very well. It’s brought untold riches to the
kingdom, very little of which was wisely spent. Saudi Arabia became one
of the greatest sponsors of terrorism throughout the world, supporting
radical jihadist groups in Pakistan, Xinjiang province in China,
Indonesia, the Philippines and many other places.
All of this was tolerated by the West
and the United States in particular. There were a number of reasons for
this. First, the use of jihadi terrorists served US foreign policy
goals, undermining governments that were insufficiently obedient to
American wishes.
Secondly, and of vast importance, it
sustained the unique role of the dollar in international trade, in
effect forcing other countries to subsidize the US economy that would
otherwise have been exposed to the inevitable consequences of running
huge internal and foreign trade deficits.......
https://journal-neo.org/2018/11/10/the-death-of-khashoggi-reveals-more-than-a-murder/
https://journal-neo.org/2018/11/10/the-death-of-khashoggi-reveals-more-than-a-murder/
No comments:
Post a Comment