“Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God” Thomas Jefferson
If law enforcement continues to treat the citizenry as their
enemy they should not be surprised if the citizenry comes to believe them.
The people who wrote the laws were thinking about citizens
and not government, which, somehow, can’t be a terrorist, so it’s OK for “our
government” to ignore the law. The Supreme Court was intended to be an
institution to protect you from government and its agents when they overstep
their bounds. Americans can’t count on courts for justice. In the police
state being erected around us, police and other government agents can probe,
poke, Taser, search, seize, strip and generally shove anyone they see fit in
almost any circumstance, with the courts blessing.
The Supreme Court’s rulings over the past 10 years reveals a
steady trend towards pro-police state rulings concerned with keeping order, protecting
government agents and not about keeping Constitutional rights protected.
The Court said that police officers who needlessly used
force by shooting multiple times at a man and his passenger in a stopped car,
killing both individuals have immunity. Police using the excuse of “reasonable
suspicion” can stop cars and question drivers based only on anonymous tips, no
matter how dubious, and without witnessing any troubling actions.
The Court granted “qualified immunity” to Secret Service
officials who relocated anti-Bush protesters, despite the protesters’ First
Amendment right to freely speak, assemble, and petition their government
leaders.
The Supreme Court ruled that persons who aren’t under arrest
must clearly raise their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
to avoid having their refusal to answer police questions used against them in a
criminal trial. A unanimous Court said police may use unreliable drug-sniffing
dogs to conduct warrantless searches of cars during routine traffic stops.
A divided Court said that a person arrested is presumed
innocent until proven guilty but must submit to forcible extraction of their
DNA. The Supreme Court said that police have broad authority to stop,
search and question individual’s and any arrested person, who is processed in
jail, can be strip searched by police or jail officials.
The Supreme Court placed their trust in the judgment of
police officers, rather than in the Constitution, when they gave police greater
leeway to break into homes or apartments without a warrant even if it’s the
wrong home.
A majority of the Supremes agreed that refusing to answer when
a policeman asks “What’s your name?” can rightfully be considered a crime. The
Supreme Court confirmed that the President and the military can arrest and
indefinitely detain individuals, including American citizens.
Justices refused to hear the case of a Texas man who was shot
by police through his closed bedroom door when his home was subject of a
no-knock, SWAT raid based solely on the suspicion that there were legally-owned
firearms in his household.
Police who don’t know their actions violate the law aren’t
guilty of breaking the law. The Supreme Court allowed police who clearly
used excessive force when they repeatedly tasered a pregnant woman during a
routine traffic stop to have immunity from prosecution.
If you aren’t polite or somehow “disrespect” an officer, he
may arrest you on a trumped up charge or even physically abuse you. The
stories of this are too many to count. What these court rulings show is an official
government attitude that interprets the Constitution one way for the elite and a
second way for the underclasses: you and me. Historically the complicity of the
courts was the final piece to fall before the totalitarian beast stepped into
the light. If history is a guide, then our future is frightening.
More than 100 American families are attacked by SWAT teams at
home every day. Less than 10% of SWAT assaults are for “hostage, barricade
or active-shooter scenarios”. Even small towns are getting SWAT teams
now. 30 years ago few small communities had a SWAT team. Now many
do. When you start arming the police and training them like military units,
eventually they start acting like military units and with frightening results.
“Consumers” would say, “The law is the law. People have to
obey the law.” Segregation was the law, as was slavery and apartheid. The law
required the round-ups of Jews in Nazi Germany. When laws violate God’s
laws, man’s laws aren’t deserving of respect or compliance. “Consumers” would
say Stormtrooper raids that leave wounded infants are the price we must pay to
be protected from whatever “threats” our rulers imagine. We’ve yet to find a way
around letting power hungry idiots decide everything.
A little-known tactic allows cops to secretly enter private
residences, search, seize property, and then leave without notifying the
homeowner. These searches, known as “sneak and peek” warrants, have been
rapidly increasing since 9/11. Secret searches reduce/eliminate the privacy and
freedom of those targeted in the investigations that are legally innocent until
proven guilty. The risk of police barging in on unsuspecting people despite
investigators’ best efforts to avoid contact could create dead or wounded.
When police enter without notice, they will appear identical
to criminal home invaders. Violent confrontations may arise, as they often do
with the use of standard “no-knock” warrants. Clandestine “black bag jobs” are
a perfect environment for corrupt government agents. If their objective is to
stage a robbery, they can steal property for their own benefit and never report
it. Pocketing cash and valuables would be quite easy for state-sanctioned
burglars operating without any witnesses. Officers also have an unchecked
ability to plant evidence and incriminate anyone. The secrecy and lack of
witnesses in these situations makes it incredibly difficult to hold police
accountable for any wrongdoing.
No comments:
Post a Comment