i see where another assault rifle forced an innocent citizen to carry it to a sniper den in order to remove from our society the horrible orange man and his racist ways. 

of course no one does any introspection and review of opinions. citizens usually choose to identify with a particular talking head and the opinions they found inside that talking head. i see few of those citizens showing any sign of considering the reality of their 'opinions' which as we all know, once adopted, are from then onwards defended cause they certainly couldn't have chosen a questionable 'opinion' or train of events chosen by themselves. 

that would indicate that they have the capacity for error. sort of like admitting to themselves and others that they had made a mistake, but to question the talking head that originally delivered the opinion is akin to questioning the supreme being.