Thursday, October 31, 2019

the historical awareness, and attention span of the average american is akin to that of a multi-colored beach ball. they know nothing and care about as much about anything beyond the end of their nose;


In celebrating the death of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, U.S. interventionists are emphasizing how vicious and brutal the man was and, therefore, that the world is better off that he is now dead.
How vicious and brutal?
Well, let’s do some comparison asking.
Was he more vicious and brutal than the current leader of Saudi Arabia, an unelected dictator whose people murdered and dismembered an innocent man in cold blood while he was visiting a Saudi embassy in a foreign country to get documents relating to his upcoming marriage?
Perhaps it’s worth mentioning that that Saudi leader is a proud partner and ally of the U.S. government.
Was he more vicious and brutal than the leader of Egypt, an unelected military dictator who uses U.S.-supplied weaponry to kill, torture, or jail political dissidents and who suppresses the results of any election that doesn’t please his military regime?
Perhaps it’s worth mentioning that that Egyptian leader is a proud partner and ally of the U.S. government.
Was he more vicious and brutal than the former leader of Chile, Gen. Augusto Pinochet, an unelected military dictator whose goons rounded up 50,000 innocent people and tortured, raped, disappeared, or executed many of them?...........https://www.fff.org/2019/10/30/in-search-of-bagdadi-to-destroy/
the empire continues in its plans and actions directed for wars for israel, as detailed in the documents contained herein;


This article was first published on April 8, 2019, several months prior to the ongoing protest movement and civil strife in Lebanon. The analysis presented in this article is not corroborated by secondary sources.
We were unable to verify the original documents which are presented as screenshots of the Al Jaheed report. (Global Research)
***
During his visit with US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, Lebanese President Michael Aoun reportedly received a US-Israeli document detailing plans for creating a civil war in Lebanon with covert false flag operations and possible Israeli invasion.
Although the source of the document is Israeli and created in partnership with Washington, no one knows who presented it to Aoun. The Lebanese TV station, Al-Jadeed, initially reported the document on Lebanese TV and a video on its website. Geopolitics Alert translated the report for this article.............https://www.globalresearch.ca/secret-document-reveals-plans-civil-war-lebanon-israeli-false-flags-invasion/5673906
pcr usually focuses upon one side of the war between the criminal gangs making up 'our' government, and does so here as well but clearly so that even ray charles could see it;


The Piece of Presstitute Excrement known as the NYTimes Has Had to Admit that Yes there Is a Deep State at War with President Trump
The New York Times Hopes the Deep State Wins
Paul Craig Roberts
This is a surprisingly good report from Robert Merry. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/52461.htm
The only mistake Merry makes is his erroneous statement that Trump held up aid to Ukraine to pressure the Ukrainian president to investigate the Ukrainian firm that made $1,750,000 payments to the corrupt Biden and his corrupt son. The transcript of the telephone call between Trump and the Ukrainian president shows no Quid Pro Quo, and the Ukrainian president says there was none. The Quid Pro Quo was entirely on Biden’s part when he told the president of Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating the firm that was paying him and his son seven figures in protection money or forfeit $1 billion in US aid. You can watch it here: https://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-joe-biden-forced-ukraine-to-fire-prosecutor-for-aid-money/C1C51BB8-3988-4070-869F-CAD3CA0E81D8.html
Moreover, even it Trump did threaten to withhold aid from a country that was covering up corruption by a US vice president and his son, that is the US president’s right. There is no reason whatsoever that a president should permit US taxpayers’ money to be given to a government that covers up corruption by a vice president of the United States.
pcr's title says it all;


Telling the Truth Has Become an Anti-American Act
Paul Craig Roberts
Stephen Cohen and I emphasize that the state of tension today between the United States and Russia is more dangerous than during the Cold War between the US and the Soviet Union. For calling needed attention to the risk of nuclear war heightened by the current state of tension, both Cohen and I have been called “Russian dupes/agents” by PropOrNot, a website suspected of being funded by an element of the US military/security complex.
Cohen and I emphasize that during the Cold War both sides were working to reduce tensions and to build trust. President John F. Kennedy worked with Khruschev to defuse the dangerous Cuban Missile Crisis. President Richard Nixon made arms control agreements with the Soviet leaders, as did President Jimmy Carter. President Ronald Reagan and Gorbachev worked together to end the Cold War. President George H.W. Bush’s administration gave assurances to Gorbachev that if the Soviets agreed to the renunification of Germany, the US would not move NATO one inch to the East.
These accomplishments were all destroyed by the Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama neoconized regimes. President Donald Trump’s intention to normalize US/Russian relations has been blocked by the US military/security complex, presstitute media, and Democratic Party.
The Russiagate hoax and currently the illegitimate impeachment process have succeeded in preventing any reduction in the dangerous state of tensions between the two nuclear powers.
Those of us who lived and fought the Cold War are acutely aware of the numerous occasions when false warnings of incoming ICBMs and other moments of high tension could have resulted in nuclear Armageddon..........https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/10/30/telling-the-truth-has-become-an-anti-american-act/
this is an email response to a group discussion and an accurate description about some of the origins of our current realities, so i post it here;


The Federal Reserve bank was given to us by Paul Warburg, emissary of the Rothchild family and bank. Income tax was part of that deal, again, ushered in by Rothschild emissary Paul Warburg, who came to America with money to bribe congress to pass these two laws. If you look at Clinton, Obama, etc. etc. the players are either Jewish (i.e.: Schiff, Nadler, Schumer) or being directed by Jews (Rod Rosenstein, Andrew Weissman, Rom Emmanuel, David Axelrod, Sidney Blumenthal, etc. etc. etc.). Either bold faced front and center, or just beneath the surface, you will find Jews orchestrating every challenge and plague on America, (i.e.:LGBT, gay marriage, abortion, pornography, open borders, muslim refugees, drugs (prescription & illegal, always working for drug legalization), affirmative action, race bating etc. etc.). When you use words like Corporate America Inc, Deep State, CIA/FBI/Justice Dept Federal Cabal etc. etc. you are playing right into their narrative, directing your thoughts to something much bigger and more complex. It's not that big, or complex. It is Israeli citizens serving the interest of Israel and their fellow Jews. This is all it is, and when you see Jews leading the charge to arrest these criminals and prosecute them, they are covering their tracks. When you see Michael Horowitz Inspector General of the Justice Dept. sending indictments on these criminals, this is how they cover themselves.

During the Inquisition which was instituted to ferret out Jews who hadn't converted to Catholicism, it was fellow Jews running the dungeons and torture chambers. The Alhambra Decree by Ferdinand and Isabella gave Jews a couple months to either: 1. Convert to Catholicism or 2. Get out of town. Soon those who swore allegiance to the Pope and Catholic Church began to show their true colors and became a problem for Spain, so the Inquisition was begun to ferret out Jewish, Catholics in name only.

Same thing in the concentration camps. There were Jewish capos running the camps, keeping Jews in line. I think it's part of their survival strategy, taking both sides, so as to direct the ire at "Communists", "Socialists", "Anarchists" giving the appearance that the problem isn't just a Jewish problem. When in truth that's all it is. In every case these surrogates were groomed and trained in their ways to distract us from the real malignant parasites destroying America, as they have every Western nation and every place they've taken root. 

This idea they are a superior race predestined by God to reign over mankind, puts them at war with the rest of humanity. Additionally they have this idea the rest of humanity is comparable to cattle or livestock, which is there to be devoured and to serve them. This ideology is evil and needs to be outed.

It's not their race, it's their ideology and objection to Christ and Christian societies. That's it and that's all it is.The truth will set us free, but it's not just Israel, it is Judaism. It is an ideology of racial supremacy, adverse to the rest of mankind and especially adverse to Christianity and the Christian West. It's really that simple and because it is a racial ideology believing in theocracy, this is where we hit them. This needs to be driven home, and also the fact that they are every one dual citizens with Israel, which is that they aren't dual citizens at all. They are simply Israelis promoting their race and country to the detriment of the rest of mankind with no love or loyalty to any other nation.
sent by a friend you are offered a history lesson in one image;



the cops can blow up your home in pursuit of a 'suspect' and will owe you nothing;


An armed shoplifting suspect in Colorado barricaded himself in a stranger's suburban Denver home in June 2015. In an attempt to force the suspect out, law enforcement blew up walls with explosives, fired tear gas and drove a military-style armored vehicle through the property's doors.
After an hours-long siege, the home was left with shredded walls and blown-out windows. In some parts of the interior, the wood framing was exposed amid a mountain of debris.
A federal appeals court in Denver ruled this week that the homeowner, who had no connection to the suspect, isn't entitled to be compensated, because the police were acting to preserve the safety of the public.
"Under no circumstances in this country should the government be able to blow up your house and render a family homeless," Leo Lech, the house's owner, told NPR. "This family was thrown out into the street without any recourse."
Lawyers for Lech argued that the police's destruction of his home was a violation of the Constitution's Takings Clause, which says private property cannot be taken for public use without "just compensation." But the problem with that argument, the appeals court ruled, is that courts have long held that police cannot be on the hook for property damage caused in the process of trying to make an arrest.
"As unfair as it may seem, the Takings Clause simply does not entitle all aggrieved owners to recompense," the appeals court wrote...........https://www.npr.org/2019/10/30/774788611/police-owe-nothing-to-man-whose-home-they-blew-up-appeals-court-says