an interesting idea has been loosened on us by who?

any questions?

a good question you won't see on your tv;

there are several really good questions about the latest police murder at the link below;

This post originally was found on FaceBook and someone then put it on Twitter. He thought the questions were important and needed to be asked and so do I.

When I first came across the video, I couldn’t make out what was happening at first, but then I realized there was a human under the officer’s knee, I thought to myself, “He’s trying to break that man’s neck.” When they took George Floyd from the ground into the “ambulance”, it did appear that his neck was overly “flexible”. I think his neck was broken. The autopsy results reported “not from strangulation or asphyxiation” but you can’t break a neck and live for long… all the signals that run the entire body go through the spine and if it is severed, the body dies.

This is a very sad situation. And it appears there is more to the story than a simple arrest. Tell me what you think after asking yourself these questions:

Staged Event?

These officers were involved with something, I’m not sure exactly what, but something is just not adding up...........read more.......

perhaps we aught to just junk the rule of law and just go with rule of dictators;

science and politics;

if you want to read the sort of stuff that facebook won't allow here it is in all of its hateful best, as i'm sure the fb censors would say. its fred doing what fred does, and quite well, in this case about the latest cop crap;

It was murder, plain and simple. There are no contradictory witnesses, no he-said-she-said. It is on the video, with no lapses. The man on the ground is clearly heard imploring mercy, begging to be allowed to breathe. Onlookers also implore. The officer knows the man is choking, yet keeps choking him. No police protocol calls for kneeling on the neck of an unresisting and handcuffed man. It was murder. It probably was sadism.

The police said he resisted arrest. They were lying. The surveillance video makes it plain. (Apparently they didn’t know that they were on camera.)

So why were they not arrested? An arrest by police requires “probable cause,” defined approximately as “ an articulable reason for believing that a specific person is committing a specific crime.” Would not having clearly identifiable perps committing the crime on video, plus audio, provide an articulable reason?

This was not like the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, in which the cop was telling the truth, or Freddie Gray in Baltimore, in which what happened remains murky, or Eric Garner in New York, in which a grand jury voted not to charge the cop.

This time there is no doubt at all. Murder. The Minneapolis police killed him, one doing it and the others looking on. These three made no effort to stop what they could see and hear perfectly. In Minnesota, does this make them accessories? I don’t know. They were not taken into custody, suggesting that the Minneapolis police saw nothing wrong with it until the video surfaced. How many other things have they regarded similarly?.......read more........