sometimes pcr surprises me with the subjects he covers, and here is one of those, as to many of us sandy hook seems a fully fictional false flag, and here pcr provides more evidence of that supposition;
Who Remembers the Sandy Hook School Shootings?
Paul Craig Roberts
The official explanation given of the Sandy Hook school shootings struck many people at the time as fishy. Various aspects of the story did not seem to go together well or fit normal procedures for such a crime. Contradictory evidence was never explained, and doubts based on evidence were ignored rather than answered.
Now a Wisconsin state judge, Frank D. Remington, has renewed doubts about the Sandy Hook event. This was not Judge Remington’s intention. It
was the result of his summary judgment in a civil defamation lawsuit in
favor of Lenny Pozner against James Fetzer and Mike Palecek. Fetzer
accused Pozner of using a fake death certificate as evidence that Noah
Samuel Pozner, age 6, was shot and killed at Sandy Hook school.
Judge Remington has renewed suspicions about the school shooting,
because he kept expert witness testimony favorable to the defendants
from the jury and issued instead his own declaration of the defendants
guilt in place of jury determination.
Two highly qualified forensic experts examined the various copies of
the death certificate that have featured in the controversy. Larry
Wickstrom concluded that one of the certificates “is an altered and
unreliable document” that permits no conclusion of forgery or
originality, that one “is a forgery,” that the State of Connecticut “has
issued two different and certified as true versions,” and that one “has
been digitally and physically altered.” Wickstrom
concludes: “That until such time as the State of Connecticut addresses
and rectifies the conditions that allow this kind of record
manipulation, any ‘true copy of a record filed,’ certified by the Seal
of State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health, should be
considered suspect and treated as unreliable.”
The second forensic expert, A. P. Robertson, noted many anomalies and
concluded: “Given the vast array of different versions of the same
document and all the numerous documented anomalies that are clearly
visible, I would ask the question, ‘Would a reasonable person of average
intelligence draw the same conclusions as the Defendants?’ I think that
the answer is almost certainly yes. I would dare to say that any person
of average intelligence would come to the conclusion that there appears
to be some sort of intentional document manipulation.”
By removing such powerful exculpatory evidence from the defense and
taking the case out of the hands of the jury, Judge Remington has given
the trial the appearance of a show trial in which the outcome was
pre-determined. It is not defamation if a person states in good faith that a document is fake. This is merely a person’s honest conclusion, in Fetzer’s case backed up by forensic experts.
The forensic testimony should have gone to the jury.
Then to get to the bottom of the Sandy Hook school shooting
controversy Judge Remington, if it was within his power, should have had
Connecticut state officials explain the anomalies and differences in
the certificates or denounce them for not being official copies.
The inappropriate way in which Judge Remington handled the case
smells like a coverup and an orchestrated lesson to people that they
will be punished if they doubt official explanations.
If the official story of the Sandy Hook school shootings is correct,
there should be abundant evidence with which to answer skeptics. Instead, skeptics have been demonized and evidence in their behalf ignored even in a court of law.
When judges fail to follow proper procedures, especially in such
controversial cases, they contribute to public perception that legal
processes are corrupt.
Carl Herman reports here: https://jamesfetzer.org/2019/07/carl-herman-the-sandy-hook-show-trial-judge-violates-right-for-jury-to-determine-disputed-facts/ on
the violation of due process by the judge apparently in order to
deep-six the evidence that the death certificates were, as Fetzer had
concluded, altered or fakes. For the experts’ finding, scroll down to near the end...........https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/07/15/who-remembers-the-sandy-hook-school-shootings/
No comments:
Post a Comment