As it’s been pointed out by a number of prominent statisticians, over the last hundred years Washington has interfered
in the internal affairs of at least 50 countries for a total of 130
individual cases. As for the last three decades, there’s been more than
40 instances of such interference, including cases of elections meddling
and fraud, coup d’etats and attempts to trigger armed conflicts. To be
more specific, the American alternative media site AlterNet managed to
establish 80 instances of Western interference over the period from 1953
to present day.
This basically means Washington won’t
think twice when it sees an opportunity to bring a government down,
imposing its will on other countries through all sorts of non-profit
organizations and intelligence agencies with the latter acting with
diplomatic immunity. These days, pretty much across the globe it’s a
running joke that there will never be a coup d’etat in Washington as
there’s no US embassy there.
However, there’s a lot of variables in
one’s fomenting of public unrest that could eventually open the
floodgates to a “color revolution.” It’s impossible confront dissent
through the use of brute force, as history has shown us on multiple
occasions. Therefore, as the United States carries on targeting one
government after another in a desperate bid to preserve its so-called
primacy upon the global political stage, the hidden springs from whence
comes another political trap are increasingly visible for those who
study history. Essentially, we’re speaking about a complex blend of
social media capabilities and intelligence operations that result in
governments that refuse to pledge their loyalty to Washington going down
one after another.
Most analysts would describe such
meddling as an exercise in “soft power”, but this term is highly
misleading, as a coup d’etat staged by an outside player is nothing
short of proxy warfare, and can inflict as much suffering and misery on
ordinary people as any outright conflict could.
Through it is seemingly benign behavior
Washington seems to use to trick individuals in committing acts they
would never even contemplate otherwise, to exercise “soft power” in
another state, Washington has to use a wide range of cultural,
information, intelligence and psychological techniques up until the
moment when public perception deviates from the actual state of affairs
in a particular country, and thus fuels discontent..........https://journal-neo.org/2019/03/13/dissecting-washingtons-color-revolution-techniques/
No comments:
Post a Comment