A friend of mine, a veteran of America’s 21st-century wars in the Greater Middle East, recently sent along his most recent commentary on Afghanistan. It would be his last, he said. “I’m done writing on how we got here — at this point I’ve said my piece, and I’m tired of being angry.” He’s moving on.
I can’t say that I blame him. A legion of critics, including many who, like my friend, base their testimony on first-hand experience, have described in compelling detail the havoc caused by post-9/11 US military misadventures in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Their efforts have yielded a vast and ever-expanding trove of memoirs, novels, histories, essays, movies, and documentaries that record their disappointment, dismay, and, in more than a few cases, sense of betrayal or despair.
Someday, perhaps in the not-too-distant future, some aspiring
scholar will set out to assess this voluminous archive of antiwar
literature. Yet however diligent or creative, that scholar will
necessarily reach one irrefutable conclusion: The practical impact of
this accumulated criticism, no matter how thoroughly documented or
artfully presented, has been negligible.
After nearly 20 costly years of war with little
to show by way of positive results, the assumptions, ambitions,
structures, and habits that constitute what Washington types are pleased
to call national security policy remain firmly in place.
To put it another way, after nearly 20 costly years of war with
little to show by way of positive results, the assumptions, ambitions,
structures, and habits that constitute what Washington types are pleased
to call national security policy remain firmly in place..........https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/03/04/us-quietly-negotiates-peace-honor-afghanistan
No comments:
Post a Comment