fifteen minutes. michael yon, michael farris and matt bracken on the price of abandoning the trump;
i began this blogspot to save sending emails to all i suspected might need or want to review: avoid being a spammer. so consider these things i thought you might find interest in. if you like what you see, pass it on. If the power elites didn’t need the consent of the public to rule, they wouldn’t have to lie constantly about their reasons for their wars on everyone. as gore vidal said: i'm not a conspiracy theorist, i'm a conspiracy observer.
vote orange, get screwed. move to israel. give them everything. mr peters sums it all up here;
Most of the people who voted for Trump thought they were voting for things that they believed – with some justification – would make America better, such as getting the rampant inflation triggered by “COVID” (specifically, by “COVID” stimulus checks) under control, lower – not higher – gas prices and a focus on this country’s problems rather than Israel’s problems. These are all reasonable (and so, unobjectionable) things. Nothing “radical” about them at all. In fact, they are remarkably modest asks that would not have been incongruent with the Democrat Party of the 1960s.
Most Americans just wanted a better life than the life they’d been living ever since “COVID” pretty much ruined everything. They voted for Trump in 2024 because they thought he might actually do what he said he was going to do. Or at least, led them to believe he was going to do. This does not make them bad people. Nor does it impugn the things they’d hoped for. The problem is that Trump is a very bad person who has managed to singlehandedly impugn everything they’d hoped for. He has made a mockery out of MAGA, which is now embodied by the AI-generated mascot of MAGA named Chudley – an obese imbecile who always finds a way to make excuses for whatever Trump does.
This may and probably is all deliberate and planned aforethought........more...........
them negros sure do like them some symbolism, no matter the cost;
Nikole Hannah-Jones is the New York Times writer who created the historically inaccurate ‘1619 Project’ which claimed that the United States was founded on slavery.
Despite being a woman of significant wealth, Hannah-Jones decided to send her daughter to a failing New York City school, because she wanted to make a point about education, race and politics. She thought that the school would be better if she and her daughter were involved with it.
Now her daughter is growing up and is asking her tough questions. She is resentful that her mother sent her to this school when things could have been so different.
Hannah-Jones just wrote a piece about this for the New York Times magazine. It’s behind a paywall, but the New York Post has some details:
Woke NYT, 1619 Project writer deliberately sent daughter to troubled schools as a ‘sacrifice’ — and it backfired spectacularly
The writer behind the New York Times’ controversial 1619 Project deliberately sent her daughter to poor Big Apple schools as a “sacrifice” to try to boost the education system — and no one is angrier than the kid.
The teen is now “boiling” mad — badly behind her peers after finally being allowed to enroll in a more rigorous high school, her mother revealed in a bombshell bizarre essay.
Nikole Hannah-Jones, 50, enrolled her only child in two struggling Brooklyn public schools beginning in 2015 — as part of a battle to change what she characterized as systemic racism, despite having the “connections and time and status” to get the girl into the city’s best schools, she wrote in the Times Magazine on Sunday…
By her own account, Hannah-Jones’ daughter Najya knows she was cheated by her parents...........more..........