Tuesday, September 22, 2026

 six minutes with seattles mayor as presented by colion noir. she is a curious individual who evidently believes what she sells;

watch........... 

 them negros sure do like them some symbolism, no matter the cost; 

 

Nikole Hannah-Jones is the New York Times writer who created the historically inaccurate ‘1619 Project’ which claimed that the was founded on slavery.

Despite being a woman of significant wealth, Hannah-Jones decided to send her daughter to a failing New York City school, because she wanted to make a point about education, race and politics. She thought that the school would be better if she and her daughter were involved with it.

Now her daughter is growing up and is asking her tough questions. She is resentful that her mother sent her to this school when things could have been so different.

Hannah-Jones just wrote a piece about this for the New York Times magazine. It’s behind a paywall, but the New York Post has some details:

Woke NYT, 1619 Project writer deliberately sent daughter to troubled schools as a ‘sacrifice’ — and it backfired spectacularly

The writer behind the New York Times’ controversial 1619 Project deliberately sent her daughter to poor Big Apple schools as a “sacrifice” to try to boost the education system — and no one is angrier than the kid.

The teen is now “boiling” mad — badly behind her peers after finally being allowed to enroll in a more rigorous high school, her mother revealed in a bombshell bizarre essay.

Nikole Hannah-Jones, 50, enrolled her only child in two struggling Brooklyn public schools beginning in 2015 — as part of a battle to change what she characterized as systemic racism, despite having the “connections and time and status” to get the girl into the city’s best schools, she wrote in the Times Magazine on Sunday…

By her own account, Hannah-Jones’ daughter Najya knows she was cheated by her parents...........more..........

 here we go with the hypocrisies again; 

 

The legacy media outrage and hysteria over the revocation of special press access is a glaring hypocrisy.

The same folks didn’t have a word to say when 440 journalists had their press passes taken by the Biden administration, and conservatives were kicked out of the room.

As the Gateway Pundit reported, JD Vance said it best.

Vice President JD Vance on Monday gave the perfect defense for President Trump’s revocation of White House access for CNN, MS Now, and Politico, highlighting the ’s exact same policy being used against right-wing outlets. 

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Trump announced on Friday that CNN, Politico, and MS Now would be banned from the White House “effective immediately.” Over the weekend, reporters from the three outlets were stunned when they were denied access to the White House grounds and had their hard passes revoked.

However, it can be recalled that under Biden, more than 442 reporters faced similar restrictions on White House hard passes.

Former White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt made headlines during her first press briefing last January by announcing that the White House would “restore the press passes of the 440 journalists whose passes were wrongly revoked by the previous administration.”...........more..........

 ten minutes titled, this could destroy youtube;

watch.......... 

 https://bustednuckles.net/id-still-have-a-death-grip-with-both-hands-to-pee-here/

 

 

 trump hails the ukie war with one tongue and bashes it with the other;

see........... 

 would you give legal immunity to the ai companies akin to what big pharma has; 

 

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent joins CNBC ‘Squawk Box’ this morning to discuss his 12-hour meeting with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng.  Within the interview Bessent details the ‘U.S.-China AI Dialogue’, the calls for a slowdown in AI development and whether regulation is needed.

Secretary Bessent notes President Trump is not going to deliver liability immunity to AI frontier labs and existing legal frameworks within the U.S. will remain as protective pathways as development moves from AI labs into engineering outcomes.

This is the core of the issue. The investors that poured money into the AI labs, now support immunity from legal liability that doesn’t exist in any other sector other than Big Pharma. AI wants the same protection as Big Pharma, and President Trump is not going to allow the shift in responsibility from AI developers to government............more.........