just do what the cops tell you and all will be well, or maybe not, as this article shows;

Oklahoma City, OK — An act of capital punishment caught on video was so excessive and over the top that five Oklahoma City police officers have been charged with first-degree manslaughter. A 15-year-old boy was complying with officers’ orders before all five cops opened fire on him, executing him in firing squad fashion.

The incident unfolded on Nov. 23, 2020, when police were called to a gas station over a report of a robbery in progress. The alleged suspect was 15-year-old Stavian Rodriguez. Until now, police ran with the narrative that Rodriguez was an armed threat. However, video proves this is not true.

When police arrived, the clerk managed to flee the store while locking Rodriguez inside. Officers had the gas station surrounded when Rodriguez climbed out of a window to comply with the officers’ orders to exit the building.

“Nobody has to get hurt, just show us your hands,” police say over the loudspeaker. Later the voice repeats, “Facedown, on the ground.”

As the video shows, when the boy walks into the parking lot, he puts his hands up, shows his waistband and is armed. Officers order the boy to drop the weapon and Rodriguez complies, going so far as to grab the pistol by the extended magazine to make sure officers knew he could not shoot at them.

After dropping the gun, officers yelled at the now-unarmed Rodriguez to comply with conflicting orders. In a probable cause affidavit from the Oklahoma County district attorney, authorities admitted the officers were “simultaneously giving him varying commands.”

Clearly confused, Rodriguez appears to reach his hand to his lower back to either pull up his pants or possibly empty his pockets. But he would never finish what he started because five officers opened fire on the boy and executed him like a firing squad........read and watch more.....

 i'd guess that this prediction has a high rate of probability;

Are World Wars a thing of the past?

Will there never, ever be a Third World War?

From recent news, it appears that Russia has developed new, monstrous weapons of inconceivable destructive power, to be delivered by intercontinental missiles. It certainly doesn't sound like the Russian government regards war as a thing of the past.

Russia has only one potential enemy - the USA. The USA is the only candidate as a victim of Russian weaponry - and for good reasons.

The USA is engaged in ceaseless efforts to annoy Russia, as well as China, a nuclear power allied to Russia.

At present, the USA is sending warships into the Black Sea, threatening Crimea, which opted to ally with Russia, and the Russian Donbass area, which has a coastline with the Black Sea.

Further, the USA instigated a revolt in Ukraine, ousted its President who was friendly to Russia, and has installed a régime beholden to the USA and hostile to Russia, which is on its northern border. President Biden's son made some juicy deals with Ukraine's pro-American government.

The USA attempted - but failed - to overthrow the pro-Russian government of Belarus ("White Russia") and install a pro-American puppet as President.

The USA has attempted to prevent the completion of an important gas pipeline, from Russia to Germany, which would provide abundant and cheap gas for German industry, in a futile effort to provide much more expensive gas, to be sent to Germany by ship from the USA.

The USA is not only engaged in annoying Russia, but also insists on annoying China and its population of about 1.4 billion Chinese.

USA annoys China by sending its aircraft carriers and their accompanying forces, through the China Sea and the islands in it, which belong to China, and through the Strait which separates Taiwan - claimed as Chinese territory by China - from China.

After umpteen years, the USA is still waging war in Afghanistan, in the middle of Asia, killing its people and destroying the country, without any success in achieving some undefined purpose.

The USA maintains active forces in the Middle East, killing its people and destroying their cities.

Indeed, the whole history of the USA is as a belligerent nation, i.e., a warlike nation. Why is this so? Why cannot the territorial ambitions of the USA ever be satisfied?  This is indeed a mystery.

What lies ahead is Doomsday for the USA. Given the nature of the USA, Doomsday is inevitable:

The USA will at some point, by its nature, be forced to attack Russia or its ally, China.

The result of this inevitable event will be the bombing, with nuclear weapons, of the territory of the USA, by Russia and its ally China.

This event will be the first event of such a nature, in the history of the USA, which, since 1812, has never suffered the consequences of war on its own territory.

And this event - the destruction of the USA by nuclear weapons. launched from Russian and Chinese submarines presently lying quietly on the bottom of the seas, off the coasts of the USA, or by  intercontinental nukes  - will mark the end of the USA.........http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/03.21/ahead.html

 mr hornberger presents a notice that there are spears coming our way, or at least that is what a court is fearful about;

For people who still have fears about the threat of a violent takeover of the federal government, a ruling by Washington, D.C., federal Judge Royce C. Lamberth has gone a long way to relieve such fears. In a decision denying bail to one of the January 6 protestors, Jacob Anthony Chansley, who is often referred to as the “QAnon Shaman,” Lamberth no doubt succeeded in calming the fears of Washington lawmakers and members of the mainstream press who remain convinced that there was a serious danger posed by the January 6 “insurrectionists,” “revolutionaries,” “insurgents,” “rebels,” “terrorists,” “traitors,” “overthrowers,” and “rioters” who were supposedly attempting to violently take over the reins of the federal government.

One of the most fascinating aspects of this phenomenon is the weapon that Chansley chose to lead the charge to take over the Capitol. He used a spear, a weapon so dangerous that Lamberth cited it as one of the principal reasons that he was denying pretrial bail to Chansley.

A spear? Yes, a spear! What could be more dangerous than that? No, don’t say an AR-15 or a Glock 19. Those weapons run the risk of malfunctioning or misfiring. Moreover, unless a person is highly trained in the use of firearms, one runs the definite risk of missing the target when firing.

A spear is obviously a much more effective weapon to employ when trying to violently overthrow a government. A spear doesn’t lock up and misfire. And it’s virtually impossible to miss with a spear. Moreover, its history as a weapon goes back a lot further than the history of guns.

Good for Lamberth in understanding the gravity of the threat that Chansley posed to America and continues to pose to America with his spear. Good for him for keeping him in jail pending his trial. Why let that pesky bail requirement in the Bill of Rights endanger the American people with the possibility of more spear attacks?

In fact, what I found surprising about Lamberth’s decision is that he seems to have failed to note a much more dangerous weapon that Chansley was using during his attempt to conquer the U.S. government. Horns. Yes, horns! He’s the guy who had his  face covered with war paint (which is scary in and of itself) and was wearing bull horns on his head.

Just think what he could have done. He could have simply lowered his head and charged members of Congress, Capitol guards, and National Guard troops with his horns. Just think how many bullfighters have been hurt or even killed in the bullring in that way? How could Lamberth have missed the grave danger posed by Chansley’s horns?

In any event, thank goodness for our federal judiciary in our nation’s capital. Thank goodness they are keeping us safe by keeping people in jail pending the outcome of their trial..........https://www.fff.org/2021/03/11/what-next-spear-control/

pcr clear about the lies we're told and who sells them, in a short essay; 

Normalizing Deceit

Paul Craig Roberts

Here is the media’s uniform misrepresentation of a nonevent—“the white supremacist insurrection” at the Capitol:

“Years of white supremacy threats culminated in Capitol riots,” Associated Press, January 14, 2021

“White supremacist extremists are the nation’s deadliest terror threat,” Los Angeles Times, January 16, 2021

“The Capitol attack was White supremacy, plain and simple,” CNN, January 10, 2021

“White Riot,” New York Times, January 13, 2021

“The seditionists made clear what their attack was about: White supremacy,” Washington Post, January 15, 2021

“What the Capitol Insurgency Reveals about White Supremacy and Law Enforcement,” Brookings Institution, January 12, 2021

“The Capitol Riot Was an Attack on Multiracial Democracy,” Atlantic, January 7, 2021.

“Insurrection Day: When White Supremacist Terror Came to the US Capitol,” Guardian, January 9, 2021.

(Source: https://www.unz.com/article/the-white-supremacist-armed-insurrection-lives-on/)

When the media lies like this, the media normalizes deceit, and the word “liar” loses its sting. Lying becomes part of the New Normal.

When government lies as well—Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, Assyd’s use of chemical weapons, Iranian nukes, Russian invasions, Russiagate—lying becomes ubiquitous.  Truth becomes so discordant that truth is discarded.  

Truth-tellers become dissident “conspiracy theorists” who are guilty of trying to shake the population’s confidence in the ruling lies.  They are censored, and if they persist they risk becoming labeled “domestic terrorists” and “enemies of democracy.”  Orwell’s 1984 is our reality.

Newspeak is used to restrict grammar and limit vocabulary in order to diminish the range of thought and communication. Thus, gender terms become impermissible, and language cannot be used to identify gender. The Democrat House has even passed House rules to this effect. A granddaughter is a grand-sibling, a stepbrother is a step-sibling, terms that obviously convey far less information. 

The feminization of university life and society in general results in feelings replacing reason, bringing an end to independent thought, which is confrontational.  “Tone” becomes more important than content.  With math and physics demonized as tools of white racism, society is on its way back to the dark ages.  (See  https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/blog/an-unleashed-feminine-mystique-is-destroying-higher-education/ )........https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/03/11/normalizing-deceit/

 i'm only part way into this article and know i have to post it here;

By Lawrence Davidson

Misuse of anti-Semitism

When it comes to anti-Semitism, the Israelis and their Zionist supporters are so deceitful that they risk the moral degradation of Judaism. How do these two things, deceitfulness and the moral degradation, that is the deterioration of ethical standards, go together in this case? 

First, the Zionists are deceitful because they purposely conflate Zionism, which is an ethnocentric political ideology adhered to by a subset of Jews, with Judaism, a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural religion. Then they insist that Israel’s allies – particularly the United States – adhere to this same propagandistic conflation.

Second, this deliberately instigated error is an attempt to stave off criticism of the Israeli state and its policies towards the Palestinians. Those policies are harsh and include segregation, ethnic cleansing and other apartheid-style acts of discrimination. By insisting that (1) the political ideology that promotes and rationalises this behaviour is an expression of the religion of Judaism and therefore (2) criticism of these policies is the equivalent of anti-Semitism, the Zionists insist that Israeli state behaviour is sanctified by the religion. This is a direct attack on the ethical standards of Judaism, hence the moral degradation. The tactic also undermines the gravity of the charge of anti-Semitism due to chronic misapplication by the Zionists.

Saturday Night Live tells a joke

Let’s take a look at the background of this situation.

First, the sad truth is that Israeli state policies result in racist behaviour towards the Palestinians. .........read more.........

 he said this so many years ago and these days its many times more accurate;

"The greatest danger of Jewish power lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government." -- Charles A. Lindbergh, Jr.

 like the meme says: prove me wrong;