if i had seen this article twenty years ago i wouldn't have read very far into it before dismissing it as crap. since then i've learned a lot of things you don't find in places owned and operated by those the article speaks about. there is much to be said about the reality described in this article. remember that history is written by the victors and consider who those victors are and how they got where they are;
When history is a lie, revisionism becomes the truth.
What we’re up against is bigger than any country. In fact, it’s bigger than all the countries in the world.
The ruthless powers that be have decided that only they can declare
what is truth and that it is against the law to disagree with them. The
human mind is being locked up for the final time.
Amazon, Google and Facebook are all Jewish entities, and all prohibit
objective discussion about the lies told about the World Wars.
Utterances that describe the events of World War II that are not
approved by the Jews are now called “hate crimes”.
Jews most definitely cannot prove what they say about WWII — but we
can. Six million?! Baloney! 296,081 is Germar Rudolf’s 2003 count,
following the International Red Cross count in October 1980 of 273,905.
How many billions of dollars have the Jews stolen from the world with
this falsehood they have inflicted on everyone with their incessant and
fallacious media propaganda?
Jews can’t prove there were gas chambers at Auschwitz or anywhere
else. The thousands of hysterical Jewish testimonies about concentration
camp horrors remain totally refuted by the International Red Cross
visits during the war which found German treatment of prisoners far
superior to the way Americans treated the Japanese prisoners they
interned during WW II.
Think about why Ursula Haverback, age 89, would risk prison to tell
the real story of WW II, in which three Jewish controlled countries —
Britain, the USSR and the USA — conspired to eliminate the last viable
challenger to Jewish financial control of the world, which was the
German economic miracle devised and deployed by Adolf Hitler. Would Mrs.
Haverbeck do this because she was insane, or because she was telling
the truth?
Even more puzzling, why would the German government insist on jailing
an old woman who questioned a simple detail of history — unless they
were trying to cover up a gigantic lie? For those with eyes to see, the
answer is clear.
https://www.johnkaminski.org/index.php/john-kaminski-american-writer-and-critic-2/169-are-you-afraid-to-tell-the-truth
i began this blogspot to save sending emails to all i suspected might need or want to review: avoid being a spammer. so consider these things i thought you might find interest in. if you like what you see, pass it on. If the power elites didn’t need the consent of the public to rule, they wouldn’t have to lie constantly about their reasons for their wars on everyone. as gore vidal said: i'm not a conspiracy theorist, i'm a conspiracy observer.
Wednesday, August 22, 2018
you tell yourself you live in the land of the free but if you believe that you've discovered a new drug which can make yourself a large profit. we aren't and haven't been free for some time. the bill of rights is a forgotten instrument, as the decider called it; a scrap of paper. be advised and if you read all of the following article, you'll discover, you ain't free;
Police in California are being sued for using excessive force against a deaf 76-year-old woman who was allegedly jaywalking and failed to halt when police yelled at her. According to the lawsuit, police searched the woman and her grocery bags. She was then slammed to the ground, had a foot or knee placed behind her neck or back, handcuffed, arrested and cited for jaywalking and resisting arrest.
In Alabama, police first tasered then shot and killed an unarmed man who refused to show his driver’s license after attempting to turn in a stray dog he’d found to the local dog shelter. The man’s girlfriend and their three children, all under the age of 10, witnessed the shooting.
In New York, Customs and Border Protection officers have come under fire for subjecting female travelers (including minors) to random body searches that include strip searches while menstruating, genital probing, and forced pelvic exams, X-rays and intravenous drugs at area hospitals.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/08/john-w-whitehead/battlefield-america-the-ongoing-war-on-the-american-people/
“A government which will turn its tanks upon its people, for any reason, is a government with a taste of blood and a thirst for power and must either be smartly rebuked, or blindly obeyed in deadly fear.”—John SalterPolice in a small Georgia town tasered a 5-foot-2, 87-year-old woman who was using a kitchen knife to cut dandelions for use in a recipe. Police claim they had no choice but to taser the old woman, who does not speak English but was smiling at police to indicate she was friendly, because she failed to comply with orders to put down the knife.
Police in California are being sued for using excessive force against a deaf 76-year-old woman who was allegedly jaywalking and failed to halt when police yelled at her. According to the lawsuit, police searched the woman and her grocery bags. She was then slammed to the ground, had a foot or knee placed behind her neck or back, handcuffed, arrested and cited for jaywalking and resisting arrest.
In Alabama, police first tasered then shot and killed an unarmed man who refused to show his driver’s license after attempting to turn in a stray dog he’d found to the local dog shelter. The man’s girlfriend and their three children, all under the age of 10, witnessed the shooting.
In New York, Customs and Border Protection officers have come under fire for subjecting female travelers (including minors) to random body searches that include strip searches while menstruating, genital probing, and forced pelvic exams, X-rays and intravenous drugs at area hospitals.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/08/john-w-whitehead/battlefield-america-the-ongoing-war-on-the-american-people/
Tuesday, August 21, 2018
posted here in its entirety the article is what a friend would then ask, 'is this racist' as he smiled;
Yesterday the Austrian ÖVP MEP Claudia Schmidt told a little too much truth on Facebook.
She was immediately denounced as a racist, including from within her own party. Her party’s general secretary called on her to apologise and threatened unspecified “consequences”.
She then deleted the postings and apologised for the “inappropriate and wrong choice of words”.
https://www.amren.com/news/2018/08/austrian-mep-africans-do-not-want-to-think-and-work-like-europeans-but-they-do-want-to-live-like-europeans/
Yesterday the Austrian ÖVP MEP Claudia Schmidt told a little too much truth on Facebook.
{snip} Neither the African nor the Muslim
culture are compatible with our culture. The desperate “dominant
culture” debates that go round every 2 years also show this.
Accordingly, I see massive and arbitrary immigration to Europe from
regions with an alien culture as a great threat to our society.
Immigration leads to a deterioration in Europe and stagnation in Africa
itself. The migration summit in Salzburg, due to take place in exactly 5
weeks, is therefore actually one of the most important summits. The
decision must be taken in Salzburg that the only people who can come to
Europe are those who have an invitation and there must be an end to the
practice of many countries issuing generous invitations and others then
having to pick up the tab for them. {snip}
But if we want to preserve our society as
it is, we cannot allow any immigration from Africa. It is childishly
naive to think that those very people whose cultures produce nothing but
misery, persecution, oppression and hopelessness can make a positive
contribution to Europe. Africans do not want to think and work like
Europeans, but they do want to live like Europeans. If they really want
our society and achievements, they could also make them a reality in
Africa. There is sufficient assistance and examples – such as the former
colonies in Asia.
{snip}
{snip}She was immediately denounced as a racist, including from within her own party. Her party’s general secretary called on her to apologise and threatened unspecified “consequences”.
She then deleted the postings and apologised for the “inappropriate and wrong choice of words”.
https://www.amren.com/news/2018/08/austrian-mep-africans-do-not-want-to-think-and-work-like-europeans-but-they-do-want-to-live-like-europeans/
buchanan has been around since nixon, and is frequently accurate in what he sees and able to articulate that vision. here he does it again in the current 'battle of wwe, american empire style';
In backing John Brennan’s right to keep his top-secret security clearance, despite his having charged the president with treason, the U.S. intel community has chosen to fight on indefensible terrain.
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper seemed to recognize that Sunday when he conceded that ex-CIA Director Brennan had the subtlety of “a freight train” and his rhetoric had become “an issue in and of itself.”
After Donald Trump’s Helsinki summit with Vladimir Putin, Brennan had called the president’s actions “nothing short of treasonous.”
The battle is now engaged. Trump cannot back down. He must defy and defeat the old bulls of the intel community. And he can.
For a security clearance is not a right. It is not an entitlement.
It is a privilege, an honor and a necessity for those serving in the security agencies of the U.S. government — while they serve.
Brennan is not being deprived of his First Amendment rights. He can still make any accusation and call the president any name he wishes.
But to argue that a charge of treason against a president is not a justification for pulling a clearance is a claim both arrogant and absurd.
Again, a security clearance is not a constitutional right.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/08/patrick-j-buchanan/in-spies-battle-trump-holds-the-high-ground/
In backing John Brennan’s right to keep his top-secret security clearance, despite his having charged the president with treason, the U.S. intel community has chosen to fight on indefensible terrain.
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper seemed to recognize that Sunday when he conceded that ex-CIA Director Brennan had the subtlety of “a freight train” and his rhetoric had become “an issue in and of itself.”
After Donald Trump’s Helsinki summit with Vladimir Putin, Brennan had called the president’s actions “nothing short of treasonous.”
The battle is now engaged. Trump cannot back down. He must defy and defeat the old bulls of the intel community. And he can.
For a security clearance is not a right. It is not an entitlement.
It is a privilege, an honor and a necessity for those serving in the security agencies of the U.S. government — while they serve.
Brennan is not being deprived of his First Amendment rights. He can still make any accusation and call the president any name he wishes.
But to argue that a charge of treason against a president is not a justification for pulling a clearance is a claim both arrogant and absurd.
Again, a security clearance is not a constitutional right.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/08/patrick-j-buchanan/in-spies-battle-trump-holds-the-high-ground/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)