i've been seeing variations on this in the last few days. there certainly are some who would jump up immediately;

As I watched the jubilation abound in the MAGA crowd, celebrating the election of Donald Trump for, I think, only the second non-consecutive two-term presidencies in U.S. History, there was something quite disturbing about it. As I have mentioned before, including the recent video post, the election was really a question of whether Kamala would be selected, leading to WWIII or Donald Trump’s election that would lead to Civil War II.

Numbering our wars is a bad sign, suggesting a continuum of hostility, but then, it’s a hostile world. Not electing Kamala, did not necessarily prevent WWIII, because they do have a few months here to instigate a war and toss it into Trump’s lap like a live grenade, if, indeed, the conflicts between Ukraine and Russia and Israel and the whole Middle East are not already beyond cooler heads prevailing. I simply recognized that Putin would take a continuance of the present regime as a persistent threat, not one that could possibly be deescalated and allow him to seek some beneficial brokered surrender of Ukraine.

Now that the outcome of the election is known, even CNN and AP finally calling Wisconsin for Trump, even though with 99% reporting, they’re only separated by 33,000 votes. Sound familiar? But he would have won it with Alaska, if they had the decency to call the obvious win as quickly as they called California.........more........