When I first learned about the Thirty
Years War in a history class in college, I was both fascinated and
amazed. How in the world could a war go on for 30 years? That just
seemed incomprehensible to me.
Not anymore. The U.S. war on Afghanistan
has now been going on for 17 years. And if the American people follow
the advice of Michael E. O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings
Institution, it’s a virtual certainty that the United States will easily
surpass the Thirty Years War and, maybe, the Hundred Years War, which
needless to say, also amazed and fascinated me when I learned about its
existence.
I can just see Americans 83 years from
now breaking the 100-year-war record and exclaiming in celebration,
“We’re Number One! We’re Number One! KAG! KAG! Keep America Great!”
O’Hanlon’s advice comes in the form of an op-ed in yesterday’s New York Times. It’s entitled “Our Longest War Is Still an Important War.” In his op-ed, O’Hanlon says that it is important that U.S. troops remain occupying Afghanistan, perhaps even in perpetuity.
Why does O’Hanlon feel this way? The
thrust of his piece is a variation on the theme that has guided the
so-called war on terrorism ever since the 9/11 attacks way back in 2001—
that it’s better for U.S. forces to kill the terrorists over there
before they come over here to get us.
Not surprisingly, O’Hanlon ignores a very
important point about this “war on terrorism” — that it is U.S.
interventionism that is the cause of anti-U.S. terrorism.
Why is that important? Because the
continued and perhaps perpetual interventionism that he is endorsing
produces the very thing that he’s using to justify the continued
interventionism.............https://www.fff.org/2019/01/25/justifying-the-17-year-war/
No comments:
Post a Comment