"History has shown that the honest man loses to the teller of white lies, who loses to the teller of black lies, who loses to the cheat, who loses to the thief, who loses to the extortionist, who loses to the murderer, who loses to the drug lord, who loses to the genocidal tyrant. The question in these dark times is not what is the government capable of, but what is it NOT capable of!" -- Michael Rivero
the video of the biden thing and the decider making some wacked comments about ukraine and iraq is further explored by caitlin in this essay;
President Biden accidentally referred to Putin’s war in “Iraq” when answering questions from the press, a year after former president George W Bush made the same gaffe. Both men played crucial roles in the push to invade Iraq.
Asked on Wednesday whether the short-lived Prigozhin rebellion was a sign that Putin was weakening, Biden replied, “It’s hard to tell really. But he’s clearly losing the war in Iraq.”
During the 2020 presidential race, Current Affairs’ Nathan J Robinson wrote the following about Biden’s pivotal role in manufacturing support for the Iraq invasion:
In 2003, Biden was “a senator bullish about the push to war [in Iraq] who helped sell the Bush administration’s pitch to the American public,” who “voted for — and helped advance — the Bush agenda.” He was the war’s “most crucial” senate supporter. Biden repeated the myth that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, saying that “these weapons must be dislodged from Saddam Hussein, or Saddam Hussein must be dislodged from power.” The resulting war was one of the most deadly catastrophes in the history of U.S. foreign policy — the Iraqi death toll was in the hundreds of thousands or possibly even the millions, and 4,500 American troops died.
That Biden’s decomposing brain would find the word “Iraq” when reaching for the word which means “nation that has been illegally invaded by an evil government” is positively Freudian.
In May of last year during a speech in Dallas, George W Bush made a similar Freudian confession, saying, “The result is an absence of checks and balances in Russia, and the decision of one man to launch a wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of Iraq. I mean, of Ukraine.”
After correcting himself with a nervous chuckle, Bush broke the tension with the words, “Iraq too. Anyway.” He then quipped that he is 75 years old, leaning harder on his “Aw shucks gee willikers I’m such a goofball” persona than he ever has in his entire life...........more.....
all indications are that diana was correct and this was part of the method. also epstein didn't kill himself and oswald wasn't anything more than a patsy. there are no coincidences. especially the many the imperial media, mouthpiece for those in charge, expect you to swallow;
Princess Diana allegedly claimed that she believed Prince Charles was planning “an accident in my car” that would leave her with a serious head injury.
This would allow him “to marry”, she reportedly wrote in a note to her former butler Paul Burrell, just 10-months before she died in a fatal Paris car crash.
Mr Burrell kept the note secret until 2003, when he revealed its existence of the note in his book, A Royal Duty, in which he claimed the princess had handed it to him as an insurance policy.
He wrote that she told him she was going to date it and he should keep it, "just in case"........more.......
if you believe what the tv tells you, i suspect you won't be interested in this post in which we discover that rfk jr has dangerous views, and he questions those in charge. we certainly couldn't have that here in the empire as it would tend to disrupt but who cares? few do as they buy the tv charade even though they tell pollsters that they have no trust in government or the imperial media;
He will take questions in front of a live audience comprised of voters in partnership with the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College. Voters in the key states of South Carolina and New Hampshire can also question the candidate.
Kennedy’s bid for the Democratic presidential nomination has garnered support from as many as 20% of Democrats, but Republicans viewed him more favorably at 40%, according to recent reports.
Polling this month from Quinnipiac University found that among Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters, 70% support Biden, 17% support Kennedy, and 8% support Marianne Williamson.
“This is a moment where RFK Jr., who first got a lot of attention for having a famous name, and then got a lot of attention for some pretty wild positions that he has taken on a number of issues – including vaccines, including the war in Ukraine, including the CIA – and he’s generated a lot of buzz. This is the moment where he is going to face, what I would submit, is probably the toughest test of his candidacy so far, which is answering real voter’s real, practical questions about his candidacy and doing it in front of a national television audience,” NewsNation Political Editor Chris Stirewalt told KOIN 6 News.
As Peter Barry Chowka notes, Kennedy has been attacked and largely shunned by the mainstream media but in at least a half dozen live interviews on FOX News, including the one with Tucker Carlson, he has expressed a message that suggests he could potentially draw support from across the political spectrum.
Kennedy, who declared his candidacy in April, is one of two Democrats (the other is self-help author Marianne Williamson) to challenge President Joe Biden for their party’s 2024 presidential nomination.
His comments, including describing the aim of his campaign as “end[ing] the corrupt merger of state and corporate power,” might resonate with a variety of constituencies.
Simple - here's 'fake-dossier-peddling' Jake Tapper explaining that Kennedy should not have a platform its because of his “dangerous ideas”...........more.........
i posted the tucker number seven the day i saw it but this part of it could do with lots of attention so here you are;
Then Tucker spoke about why Joe Biden is running for reelection. From what we now know, Joe Biden is one of the most corrupt politicians in US history. His policies suck, the economy sucks, his foreign policy is embarrassing, his energy policy and is based on fantasy. Joe Biden can barely walk and cannot think clearly. So why are Democrats running this obvious loser? Because they can.
Tucker Carlson: Last week, a whistleblower produced WhatsApp? Messages from Hunter Biden proving that at the very least, his father knew about his influence pedaling businesses abroad and probably participated in them…
…So a whistleblower produces a text message showing that Joe Biden was in the room with his son when his son was selling influence to an enemy power. The Chinese government and ABC’s take on it. Joe Biden is a father first, take it or leave it. What accounts for a response like that? Well, that’s the way you talk when you’ve got nothing to fear from an upcoming presidential election. You don’t even bother to think of an excuse for your candidate because you don’t need to. Your country has electronic voting machines. Joe Biden got 81,282,916 votes in 2020, and you’re pretty sure he can do it again. In fact, you know he can’t. You’re not worried,
The RINO Republicans and FOX News pundits are still pretending that we have free and fair elections. Any child could out debate Joe Biden. But if you’re stealing elections it doesn’t matter......more.........
