fourteen minute video about what's in your drinking water;


https://youtu.be/LefSXVkoTI4

who does ethanol really benefit;


The U.S. Corn Ethanol Industry, the largest in the world, is now losing a serious amount of money producing unprofitable biofuel.  While the situation for the ethanol producers was bad in 2018, due to losses stemming from falling margins, it’s even worse this year.  This has prompted one of the country’s largest ethanol producers, ADM – Archer Daniels Midland, to sell some of its ethanol assets with the possibility of spinning off its entire ethanol business operation. 
While higher corn prices and falling revenues have negatively impacted the U.S. Ethanol Industry recently, that is only a small part of a much bigger problem. You see, the EROI (Energy Returned On Investment) for corn-based ethanol, is so low, there’s virtually little if any, net energy produced from the 16 billion gallons of the biofuel supplied by the U.S. industry last year… or any year prior.
IMPORTANT NOTE:  Please understand my analysis of the U.S. ethanol industry is focused at the macro-economic level and is not directed at the individuals or companies who are doing the best to their abilities.  The main problem as I see it is that the leadership today is not providing the market with wise advice on our energy situation.  Instead, we are ignorantly heading over the energy cliff without a care in the world.  Unfortunately, this will end badly
That being said, according to the Alternative Fuels Data Center, U.S. ethanol production has more than doubled from 6.5 billion gallons in 2007 to 15.8 billion gallons in 2017:..........https://srsroccoreport.com/the-u-s-corn-ethanol-boondoggle-producing-1-million-barrels-per-day-of-unprofitable-energy

you won't sleep well with this individuals thoughts and evidence but i assure you he hits the nails on their respective heads, repeatedly thru all of his posts i've read;


Jim Rickards has written a new book Aftermath. In chapter 6 he discusses the Mar a Lago Accords.
He has previously predicted $10,000 gold and $400 silver with no reliable date as to when that happens . Now he is also predicting in his latest book that the dollar will no longer be the world’s reserve currency.
That will mean we can no longer print I Owe You Nothing Federal Reserve Notes to buy free things for free from overseas so that American voters would not realize that the Elite had decided to cut their wages and raise their rents by allowing unlimited legal and illegal immigration.
The proposed Mar a Lago Accords would be similar to the Plaza Accords of 1985 and the Louvre Accords of 1987 which lowered American living standards. They were agreements reached by the G-6 nations that lowered the value of the US dollar making it possible to absorb tens of millions of immigrants by guaranteeing everyone a job even if at a lower wage.
The high value of the dollar meant that Washington DC could sell Treasury bonds overseas so they could pay the wages of 31 million federal, state and local government workers who were immune to the influx of immigrants.
President Obama did something similar to devaluing the dollar in Obamacare. From 1998 to 2011 we added 44 million people to America’s population through legal and illegal immigration and their offspring. But the total number of hours worked remained constant at 196 billion hours. Locally,  a black woman who was a fast food restaurant manager explained to her crew that none of them would ever get to work 40 hours a week. President Obama had cut their weekly wages 25% but few of her employees ever figured that out. Some did cry because the knew the hardship facing them. They were just unaware that their President had betrayed them for the benefit of illegal aliens...........https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2019/07/29/the-mar-a-lago-accords-and-permanent-poverty/

saved this doc some years ago to get me thinking about thinking, but don't remember the source and it may have been from several sources;

“The important thing is not to stop questioning.” Albert Einstein

Information that is consistent with our existing attitude is understood
and processed easily. Our mind needs consistency so information that is inconsistent with our existing mental picture gets overlooked, distorted, or rationalized to fit existing thinking. The investigator should try to disprove, rather than prove, each of the alternatives. One key to identifying the kinds of information that are potentially most valuable is to ask yourself what it is that could make you change your mind. This simple tactic would do much to avoid surprises.

"Don't confuse me with the facts. My mind is made up!"

Some choose their opinions based upon what they wish to believe rather than as a result of exploration. As in, my friend thinks like this or my father always thought that. What we think of as accurate evidence for our viewpoint often depends more upon prejudice than facts. We take in information and process it according to our personal biases. It becomes: I know this issue. I have studied it. I have a personal involvement with the issue therefore I know it well. It is worth no more than any other option, but the psychology of "owning" the issue makes us value it more. Information that is consistent with our existing thinking is perceived and processed easily.  If you decide to respect someone or believe something you can not doubt yourself even when contrary evidence appears.

Why do we do the things we do? How can two people, or even large groups, look at the same set of facts and come to such widely different
conclusions? Maybe even more important would be to ask why? Is there some bias involved? We have a tendency to believe what we want to believe. We seek information and draw conclusions consistent with what we want to be true. When people draw conclusions about political events, they're not just weighing the facts. Without knowing it, they're also weighing what they would feel if they came to one conclusion or another, and they often come to the conclusion that would make them feel better, no matter what the facts are.

When everyone is thinking the same no one is thinking. Groupthink is often characterized by: An inclination to study too few possibilities, lack of serious review of other's ideas, selective information gathering, no planning for possibilities and rationalization. The group has a fantasy of immunity and shared morality, true feelings and beliefs are suppressed, and censors may be chosen to protect the group from negative information. Some people repeat manufactured thoughts with no evidence of having reasoned them thru. Neither the right nor the left looks at problems without prejudice or searches for all the necessary details. I think a great deal of your viewpoint has to do with your environment. We tend to go on our emotions and most recent input. And those emotions can be influenced by the crowd we run in. That is why it is so important to read those who disagree with you. You may simply to wish to believe something is valid. We all too often find "facts" to fit our stories rather than letting our stories be dictated by the facts. It’s as if being able to disprove one of my assertions will cause the others to disappear.

Confirmation bias is the inclination of people to read material which reinforces their present views. They associate with people who agree with them and who think like them. So their biases are constantly confirmed. The antidote is to read material, and associate with people, who do not agree with your views. It is more important and profitable to learn why you are wrong than to hear why you are right. Knowing anything at all takes an investment of time and energy. People that spend their whole lives getting to know something rarely admit that the time was wasted. Once invested in an idea, a religion, a stock, or a career a man can't help but believe in it. He damns the man who questions his thinking. If he has the power to do so, he burns him at the stake.

Most want a cozy society with both security and meaning. They want a framework of known, satisfying, personal relationships where they would be surrounded by others equally satisfied and no challenge to the status quo. Then they insist that their myopic or narrow vision must be universalized.

Why is it that when someone feels insulted by you they automatically assume you intentionally chose to do so. They never, it seems, consider the possibility of misunderstandings. To be unpopular in school is to be actively persecuted. Popularity is only partially about individual attractiveness. It's more about alliances. To become more popular, you need to do things that bring you close to other popular people, and nothing brings people closer than a common enemy. Attacking an outsider makes them all insiders. If it's any consolation to the nerds, it's nothing personal because the group of kids who band together to pick on you are doing the same thing, and for the same reason, as a bunch of guys who get together and go hunting. They don't actually hate you. They just need something to chase.

Mother knew instinctively what the keepers of the castles have always known: the kind of trouble that might threaten the symmetry of a well ordered garden needs time to take root. Take away the time and you choke off the problem before it begins. Obedience reigns, the plow stays in the furrow and things proceed as they must. Which raises an uncomfortable question: Could the Church of Work which today has Americans aspir­ing to sleep deprivation the way they once aspired to a personal knowledge of God be an anti-democratic force? "There is no better ballast for keeping the mind steady on its keel, and sav­ing it from all risk of crankiness, than business." Do we escape by saving our bodies and letting our soul and minds leap for us? Do we become among those who, as Benjamin Franklin suggested, die at 25 but aren't buried until they are 70? One might take that leap of faith towards something that protects us from the unknown. Full humanness means full fear and trembling, at least some of the waking day. When you get a person to emerge into life, away from his dependencies, his automatic safety in the cloak of someone else's power, what joy can you promise him with the burden of his aloneness?
You don't have to be a psychiatrist to confront this irregularity. I have spent my journalistic life attempting to tell people things that will help them understand what is really happening around them. Yet the closer I have come to succeeding, the more resistance I have found. For some, even asking hard questions is a suspect activity. After all I am stealing their scarecrows.

Acceptance is more useful than anger and more realistic. Anger owns you without recourse.

Watch your thoughts, they become words.

Watch your words, they become actions.

Watch your actions, they become habits.

Watch your habits, they become character.

Watch your character, for it becomes your destiny.

your daily thin blue line serving;

Baytown Texas cops beat a man and then arrested him after they mistook completely legal antibiotics for illegal drugs.

Baytown, TX — Baytown Texas police officers are under investigation following allegations of police brutality and unnecessary use of force after savagely beating a man for having antibiotics. Earlier this month, Kedrick Crawford was targeted by officers for merely looking “suspicious” in a gas station parking lot. When officers arrived, Crawford reportedly offered his personal information and allowed police to search his vehicle. Crawford seemed to become agitated as the search proceeded. At some point during the police search he questioned why Baytown PD were searching so frantically to find evidence against him. One officer responded saying Crawford already gave them permission to search the vehicle.
“When am I free to go,” Crawford asked, to which an officer replied, “Whenever man!” Five seconds later, police escalated to what Crawford believes to be an unlawful arrest.
In what seemed like an instant, things took a turn for the worse for Crawford. He was told to turn around and put his hands behind his back — which he did. The arresting officer then told Crawford not to “tense up.” The man was then thrown on the side of his own vehicle and then taken violently to the ground, all the while repeatedly screaming “what did I do?”.........https://thefreethoughtproject.com/man-gets-violently-attacked-by-police-for-not-being-a-criminal-antibiotics/

this is one tool the empire uses to control the narrative, and outcome;

Tulsi Gabbard, Was the Most Searched for Candidate After the First Debate, Google then Deactivated Her Ad Account, She’s Suing for $50 Million.

Representative Tulsi Gabbard, the long-shot presidential candidate from Hawaii, said in a federal lawsuit that Google infringed on her free speech when it briefly suspended her campaign’s advertising account after the first Democratic debate in June.

The lawsuit, filed on Thursday in a federal court in Los Angeles, is believed to be the first time a presidential candidate has sued a major technology firm.

In a twist that reflects Ms. Gabbard’s unorthodox political views, the claim that her speech was stifled by Google is similar to complaints made over the last year in Republican circles. Few Democrats have raised similar concerns.

Big tech companies like Google are getting increasing scrutiny by lawmakers and regulators around the world for a wide variety of issues, including their influence on political debate, their handling of consumer data, and the aggressive way they compete with smaller companies........https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/this-is-how-the-narrative-is-controlled-no-one-outside-the-inner-circle-can-get-popular/

the mayor of nyc on 911 seems to have been telling some lies that day and since which you may find interesting in this exploration;

‘No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar.’ — Abraham Lincoln (1809 – 1865)

In the course of our work on these pages, we’ve noted many instances in which Crime Syndicate operatives have gone off script. One of the weak points of the Syndicate is the tendency of its arrogant members to reveal clues to false flags, Gladio events or staged deceptions. It seems that there are prima donnas who can’t learn the script and thus sometimes ad lib the situation. Accordingly their stories don’t hold up to Trivium method scrutiny.

One such ad libber was Rudolph Giulani, who was mayor of New York City on 9/11. And he punted a doozy of a lie about it.

Giulani went on the air at 1 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2001, with ABC News’ Peter Jennings and declared the following. It can be heard starting at 1:45 in the first video.

I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barclay Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. And it [the South Tower] did collapse before we could actually get out of the [Barclay Street] building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out..............https://www.winterwatch.net/2019/07/nyc-mayor-rudy-giulianis-pants-were-on-fire-during-9-11-a-case-study-in-lie-spotting/