Friday, September 11, 2026

 a globalist pos, carney, looks to keep the ukie war going;

 

 Prime Minister Mark Carney really is a globalist piece of work.  As Ukraine Prime Minister Volodymr Zelenskyy arrives in Alberta, Canada, to coordinate with the latest European leader Mark Carney, the remarks said in this brief greeting and introduction video are stunning in a geopolitical context.

It is obvious that Prime Minister Carney is trying to position himself as a decisionmaker in the outcome of the Russia-Ukraine conflict by pushing Zelenskyy even deeper into intransigent positions that will only lead to greater conflict.

Carney positions Canada squarely on the side of Ukraine and in violent opposition to Russia.  Not coincidentally, this is the exact opposite ¹position of the United States, and that is a feature not a flaw.

Carney really does view himself as European first and foremost.  He even remarks that Canada in general, and he as the Prime Minister specifically, will ensure that Ukraine advances to become a European member state.  How, exactly, does he as a North American leader expect to make this happen?.........more............

 

 larry johnson writes of the ukraine war, from beginning to where we are now;

 

Across three pieces I’ve written for Sonar21, I have been making one continuous argument: The war in Ukraine was not a crisis that erupted in 2022. It was the payoff of a deliberate, decades-long Western project to turn Ukraine into an instrument for weakening Russia — carried out under the cover of “partnership” and “peacekeeping.” And having spent thirty years building that instrument, Washington and NATO will do with Ukraine exactly what they have done with every client before it: discard it the moment it stops paying.

The camel’s nose: 1992–1999

The West slipped its nose under the Ukrainian tent almost the instant the Soviet Union collapsed. The formal machinery started in 1992, when Ukraine joined NATO’s North Atlantic Cooperation Council. The practical military ties came fast behind it: the U.S.–Ukraine State Partnership Program with the California National Guard in 1993, Ukraine’s entry into the Partnership for Peace and its first joint exercise in 1994, and the standing-up of the Yavoriv training area near Lviv............more.........

 caitlin shows us evidence of bibi's criminal activities;

 

 The Israeli press has published three significant revelations about the Gaza holocaust, reporting (1) that Benjamin Netanyahu concealed advanced knowledge of the Hamas attack on October 7, (2) that Israel rejected a Hamas offer to release all civilian hostages immediately after October 7, and (3) that according to an IDF drone operator, the Israeli military was intentionally firing on civilians throughout Gaza during its operations in the Palestinian territory.

The first two come from a Haaretz article titled “Revealed: Netanyahu Received an Explicit Warning Days Before Oct. 7. He Didn’t Brief Israel’s Security Chiefs”, which was released ahead of an upcoming Haaretz book about the hostage standoff in Gaza.

Haaretz describes a call between Netanyahu and UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed, citing three foreign senior sources:.........more............

 

 

 a 911 coincidence theory; 

 

I was at the Pudong Shangri-La Hotel on the evening of Sept 11, 2001(Beijing Time) for a dinner with a grad school professor.

When we walked into the hotel bar for a drink, there was a crowd gathered around a TV screen watching a live CNN footage of a burning WTC North Tower.

Then there was another explosion in the other tower with a massive fireball bursting out of the windows.

I was stunned and thought it couldn’t be real. What happened must be a high drama, mistakenly broadcast as live news.

I was glued at the hotel TV for a couple of hours and went home just to continue the live coverage of that day’s events from my satellite dish – yes, satellite dishes were still used in those days.

Over the years, the shock wore off but there was always an eerie feeling what happened wasn’t real.

It was only in 2016 when I first stumbled on the internet hit film Loose Change that ignited an interest to find out more about the event.

It was a rabbit hole.

9/11 had even more layers of mysteries than the JFK assassination, which I read up over the years out of curiosity since the 1992 Oliver Stone movie.

After reading dozens of books and browsing many more websites, I came to form a view on the event.

I started to write this essay a year ago when Tucker Carlson’s 9/11 series in 2025 generated renewed interest in the catastrophic event.

But the Carlson revisit was obscured quickly by the 9/10 killing of Charlie Kurk, by a “lone gunman” in the same fashion as Lee Oswald and Sirhan Sirhan.

All too convenient..........more..........

 this author makes the point that 911 changed the empire dramatically enough to qualify for the version 2.0 label. we ain't the same country we were before that; 

 

On September 11, 2001, my wife called and woke me up, screaming, “It’s the end of the world!” I was sleeping, after working the graveyard shift at the data center, which I did for many years. She urged me to turn on the TV. I saw then Mayor Rudy Giuliani walking through the dust covered streets of New York City. Was I dreaming?

It took me about two minutes, until I first saw video of the South Tower collapsing, to realize this was a giant psyop. The notion that 19 crazed Arabs, armed only with box cutters and plastic knives, had brought these wonders of modern engineering down, along with blowing a hole in the Pentagon, was something I immediately rejected. I’ve written about 9/11 several times before on Substack, and delved into it deeply in both Hidden History and American Memory Hole. Most of my readers are familiar with the monstrous holes in the official story. Building 7, hit by nothing, collapsing just like Buildings 1 and 2. Not to mention that the BBC reported live that Building 7 had collapsed, before it did. You can see it standing in the background behind the reporter. As USA Today helpfully explained, “BBC mistakenly reported that World Trade Center Building 7 had fallen before it happened.” Well, sure that’s understandable- to accidentally report events before they really take place, shortly afterwards.

All “conspiracy theorists” know about Building 7. But what about Building 6? Kurt Sonnenfeld, a videographer who worked for FEMA, took lots of videos, and claimed that the estimated $650 million worth of gold stored in Building 6 had already been emptied, by someone, prior to the 9/11 attacks. Sonnenfeld’s wife Nancy was shot and killed on December 31, 2001, and the authorities attempted to pin the murder on him. The murder charge was eventually dropped due to lack of evidence, but the prosecutor was still coming for him. Sonnenfeld fled the country, and was later granted asylum in Argentina. Sonnenfeld gave informed lectures on 9/11, talking about the mysterious power outages and evacuations in the weeks leading up to the events, and the fact that two close Bush family members controlled the company in charge of security at the World Trade Center. He charged that “hundreds of government personnel” were in New York City on September 10, preparing for one of those familiar “drills.”.........more...................

 pcr speaks about 911; 

 

The shock of September 11, 2001, was so great that, despite some initial skepticism, it was four or five years afterward that professional and scientific independent investigators presented evidence that the official narrative had serious problems.  Over the years as the evidential problems for the official narratives grew in number and magnitude, I reported the findings.  On many anniversaries of the event, I reminded readers that there was more evidence against the official narrative than there was evidence for it.  I am not going to repeat all of this information today, as it would be book length.  Instead, I am going to show you a different way to think about what is in some ways a defining event.

Before we begin, keep in mind that as early as 2006–long before evidence began accumulating that the official narrative was a lie–a Zogby Poll found that 42% of Americans believed the government concealed and refused to investigate important evidence.  How could they believe otherwise with New York’s Chief Fire Marshall protesting that in violation of law the forensic evidence contained in the debris of the Twin Towers and Building 7 was carried away and shipped out of the country before it could be investigated?  How could they believe otherwise when the Cheney/Bush/Zionist Neoconservative administration refused for one year to even convene, not an investigation, but a politically selected committee to ratify the official narrative, especially when afterward the co-chairman of the committee and chief legal counsel wrote books saying the committee was set up to fail, that information was withheld from the committee and that the committee had considered criminal referrals?

Of course, the whore American media reported all doubts as conspiracy theory.  Any skeptic of the official narrative was a “conspiracy theorist,” as an AI check using the official narrative as the data base will tell you today.........more.........