the author calls this: the great inversion or how false hope is sold to the masses;

(The Conscious Resistance) Over the last year I have begun to use the phrase “The Great Inversion”, or, simply, The False Awakening. I have yet to explain why I use this term and what it exactly it means, though I am sure readers/viewers have mostly grasped it by now.

I define The Great Inversion as:

“A false awakening whereby the steadily waking masses of freedom lovers are duped (once more) into falling for fake heroes and messiahs, and stealthily manipulated into supporting their own enslavement.”

Essentially, I believe the rise of actors like Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, and other figures is part of a false awakening taking place where many freedom lovers around the world are looking to these figures as the last line of defense against The Predator Class and the Technocratic State.

Despite the attacks on Trump and Musk, their actions reveal their true character. I have extensively documented the ways in which Donald Trump serves the swamp and is not a friend of liberty. Even as I write this, Donald Trump has just announced his pick for Vice President is J.D. Vance, a Zionist whose rise came as a result of $15 million dollars from Peter Thiel, the infamous tech bro from PayPal, the surveillance firm Palantir, and a steering committee member of the Bilderberg Group.

I know this will be hard for some to accept in light of the assassination attempt, but read on.

Meanwhile, Musk promotes brain chips, transhumanism uses his Star Link satellites to support war in Ukraine, and, generally, promotes a vision of the world that looks very similar to the World Economic Forum’s 4th Industrial Revolution.

I believe the bigger picture is that the Predator Class want Donald Trump to win the U.S. (s)election to create more false hope in disillusioned Americans, conservatives and libertarians who haven’t quite seen what Trump actually represents. From there, we will see the push for more chaos before order is implemented.........more........

 larry johnson has lots to present in this post with an important interview, and news and views on our various wars;

My interview of Dimitri Simes is now available at my Counter Currents channel. It is quite a story. Dimitry fled the Soviet Union in 1973, shortly after being released from prison, and arrived in the United States seeking freedom. Now, 50 years later, Dimitry — who is a US citizen — was compelled, once again, to flee authoritarian rule. Only this type, the tyrant is the United States and the sanctuary is Russia.

Upon arriving in the United States without any savings, Dimitry set to work trying to establish a new life in America and he quickly found a niche as a genuine Soviet expert. He was mentored by such luminaries as Paul Nitze and Fred Ikle. (I realize those names are meaningless to you youngsters out there, but in the 1980s, they were major players in the realm of arms control and the US Department of Defense.) Thanks to serendipity (or the hand of God), Dimitry became friends with former President Nixon and was named President of the Nixon Center, a Washington, D.C. think tank.

Dimitry held that job for 30 years. That is where I first met him. I was invited to participate in a small seminar in December 2002, that included former CIA Director James Schlesinger, Fox News pundit Charles Krauthammer, Ambassador Joe Wilson and W. Patrick Lang, former head of DIA’s Middle East Division. There were only twelve of us, plus Dimitry, sitting around a conference table trying to ascertain what the George W. Bush Administration planned to do in Iraq.

Two weeks ago, the FBI raided and ransacked Dimitry’s home in Virginia. He was not there, thankfully. Scott Ritter got off light compared to what the FBI did to Dimitry’s home. They absconded with paintings and furniture, and they physically damaged portions of the house. The FBI did something that the KGB never did to Dimitry. I hope you take the time to watch our conversation...........more........

 there's more surrounding the 'kamala interview' than there was in it;

In an effort to provide as much assistance as possible, CNN heavily edited the Kamala Harris interview as agreed between their producers and the campaign of Kamala Harris (Brian Fallon).   The narrative engineering within the interview, which includes soft guidance by Dana Bash, is transparent and openly visible.

The backlash against CNN is also very visible in all social media examples where the interview is being highlighted.  To present the post-broadcast coverage, CNN has uploaded the interview in three segments.  You will find them below. ........more......

 kamala is a lie from start to where ever she is now;

FIRST – When someone says, “to be honest with you” – they are admitting their predisposition to be a liar.   Why?  Because in direct and truthful communication there is no reason to quantify the truthfulness of your statement.

Saying, “to be honest with you,” directly infers that a persons’ statements can, or cannot be, truthful.  The statements are positional depending on the intentions of the speaker.   In summary, anyone who says “to be honest with you” is very familiar being dishonest in their speaking.

SECOND – Notice when Kamala Harris explains her thoughts, her thinking, at the time when Joe Biden informed her, he was going to drop out of the race.  Notice that nowhere in her thought process, or the thought process of Biden as Harris describes it, is any consideration to the “voters” within her frame of reference or mindset.

As she self describes the events, Kamala Harris never gave a second thought to the Democrat voters in the primary when Joe Biden told her he was dropping out of the race.  Her only thoughts were of Joe Biden and herself.   This is how she would lead the nation.  .........more.........

 there are several reasons i post this and here are a few; a lot of people use telegram and its a freedom of speech issue in france and beyond on too many levels;

The Pavel Durov saga is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time to come. This is what hot information war is all about. So let’s attempt to connect several loose ends.

A high-level Russian analyst makes the case that Durov’s arrest is connected with “anti-French protests in its former colonies, withdrawal from its traditional ‘sphere of influence’ where Telegram infrastructure was used to push anti-colonial and anti-Macronist narratives”.

Add to it an “attempt to influence narratives on Ukraine both in Russian and the international media field, which is highly dependent on Telegram infrastructure.”

Paris is indeed desperate to make itself relevant when it comes to psy ops and influencing/special warfare in Ukraine.

However, as the analyst notes, the French don’t have the tech means to accomplish it. So this may have led to Macron deciding to “exercise a personal pressure campaign against Durov himself. French authorities must be rather desperate in trying to keep their heads in the game of global politics. And Telegram today is (his italics) global politics.”

Paris was just waiting for a big break. When the pilot of Durov’s Embraer private jet submitted his flight plan, there was no warrant for his arrest in France. Only when the jet was on its way to Le Bourget, Paris filed the warrant in haste. Durov was clueless all along.

In a nutshell: Paris got a fateful heads up he was flying into France – could have been via Durov’s Dubai-based, post-obsessive, social climbing girlfriend – and laid out the trap in a flash..........more......

 it seems that we have a 'democratic emergency' in france that few are aware of;

Imagine you are a head of state facing a domestic crisis. You bypass vote in the parliament to force unpopular measures through questionable methods (amid major protests), then use excessive violence against the demonstrations. Next, you call snap elections to neutralize radical political dissidents, and lose it. Then, you use a major international sports event to gain more time and just ignore the election results by refusing to name a Prime Minister from the winning coalition.

What are you, then? Some would certainly use the word “dictator” even. It would be hard indeed to describe such a peculiar state of affairs as anything other than a kind of a coup d’état, right? In this case, the international community would certainly denounce the authoritarian head of state and pressure him or her into complying with election results, right? Well, not necessarily so if you are Emmanuel Macron. A quick look at the events may offer a glimpse of the depth of the trouble the French are in.

First, Macron dissolved the Assemblée Nationale and decided to call new legislative elections, on June 30 (and on July 7, for the second round). This was a response to the fact that the right-wing populist party Rassemblement National’s (RN) won the European elections, which in itself was a defeat for the President. RN, formerly known as Front national (until 2018) is the party of  Marine Le Pen, who, bear in mind, vowed to pull France out of NATO’s military command in 2022, when she was a (defeated) presidential candidate. Macron won the election back then, but Le Pen was promising this while heading to the second round and certainly raised many eyebrows among Paris’ political Establishment.

As I wrote before, describing the RN party or European populist parties in general as pure and simple “fascism” is not accurate. The French President’s measure in June was in any case a daring move to crush a political group which is seen as a threat. Senator François Patriat, who is an ally of Macron, at the time said: “The president’s back in control. Now he’s taking action. It’s the end of Marine Le Pen.” Many criticized the decision and feared it could backfire and result in France having a “far-right” Prime Minister. This did not happen. But the result was certainly not what Macron was hoping for.

The snap elections, as mentioned, were described as a risky political gamble. Macron lost it. Even though the result was a “hung parliament”, the New Popular Front or Nouveau Front populaire (NFP) did win the larger number of parliamentary seats, which was a humiliating political defeat for the President. Macron himself, however, begs to differ: “no one won”, he has stated. According to him, “The blocs or coalitions that emerged from these elections all represent a minority.” The NFP disputes this: “The New Popular Front is without contest the first force in the new National Assembly”.......more..........

i don't remember ever seeing such things in the history of the empire's 'election's'; 

It is just another day in clown world after the X account of Vice President Kamala Harris (@VP) posted a hand-written letter purportedly written by Tucker Carlson decrying the Second Amendment that was clearly not written by the real Tucker.

The letter, signed simply with the name "Tucker," is addressed directly to Kamala. It thanks her profusely for "establishing common ground" when it comes to imposing "common-sense gun safety laws" on Americans, and pushes for further restrictions to keep Americans safe from gun violence.

"In the spirit of establishing common ground, even though I am fairly conservative and we may have our disagreements, I am writing to express my gratitude for your's [sic] and President Biden's efforts to establish common sense gun safety laws," the letter reads.

"Owning firearms is every American's [sic] constitutional right. Like all things, there needs to be reasonable regulation like age restriction, background checks, and mental health screenings. Thank you for heading the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention and for your's [sic] and President Biden's push for common sense gun safety laws. I look forward to seeing what the Biden-Harris administration accomplishes in this regard."

The @VP X account in responding to this letter thanked Tucker for sending it and further tweeted a message from Kamala to the world suggesting that she and the real Tucker Carlson are somehow in agreement that there needs to be more restrictions on the Second Amendment – see below:......more........