russian propaganda exposed in two minutes;
Sunday, May 5, 2024
the congressional critters passed a law that this presentation takes you thru, and the sentence beginning the article, below, explains it all, with the rest being details;
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”
Submitted by Revisionist Historians for World Peace
This time was bound to come.
For there was only one way the treacherous traitors in the U.S. Congress could be sufficiently compelled and coerced to effectively cancel the First Amendment.
The Traitors In Congress Have Passed New Vile and
Unconstitutional Hate Speech Legislation
That would be the hollow clarion call by the Jewish and Christian Zionists to stamp out an anti-semitism that does not even exists … … … except, of course, in the minds of those hopelessly deluded souls who still worship in the Synagogue of Satan..........more........
mr peters suspects the orange man may be a bad man, in disguise;
The Orange Man is seen by many as the man who will stop the spread of authoritarianism in the United States. But maybe he’s the man who’s going to legalize it.
Orange Man has promised that, if elected, he will confer immunity from prosecution upon the enforcers of authority; i.e., the police – thereby conferring upon them carte blanche to enforce their authority as much as they like (and irrespective of the law).
In this possible future, if you are accosted by a cop who has no legal right to accost you – a good example of this being the lawful video-recording of cops giving a wood shampoo to someone else who has affronted their authority – and you object to being accosted and quickly find yourself being given a wood shampoo – the cop who gave you the wood shampoo could not be prosecuted for abusing you.
Do you suppose this will result in cops self-policing? Restrain them from administering wood shampoos?........more........
the horn of plenty is fast being emptied;
Massachusetts Democrat Governor Maura Healey has just approved hundreds of millions in new spending for illegal immigrants, even as people are fleeing the state for greener pastures.
Massachusetts is a sanctuary state where homeless migrants must be housed, no matter how badly it works out for citizens.
The state is spending an insane amount of money on people who entered the country illegally.
Townhall reports:
Democrat Massachusetts Gov. Approves $400 Million In Freebies for Illegal Immigrants
Despite residents fleeing Massachusetts, Democrat Gov. Maura Healey (D-MA) signed a bill welcoming hundreds more of illegal immigrants into her state.
Healey signed the state budget this week that includes an additional $426 million to house illegal aliens in correspondence to the state’s “right to shelter” law that requires the government to put illegal immigrants and homeless people into homes.
The Democrat governor’s move comes as Boston declared a state of emergency after it exhausted its resources last year due to the massive influx of illegal immigrants coming to the sanctuary state.
According to a report, Massachusetts currently has more than one million illegal aliens residing in the state. It is expected to cost taxpayers over one billion dollars by 2025 to house them.
This number doesn’t include the 14,000 illegal Haitian immigrants Massachusetts has funded since 2022. CBS News noted that there are more than 3,500 illegal immigrants just in the state’s shelter system— which has been at capacity for months.
It’s like American citizens are the last consideration........more........
larry johnson explores the nature of war in its various methods and concludes russia is better suited to these tactics than the empire is and it would surely loose any war with the russians;
Colonel Alex Vershinin, writing for the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), is out with a stunner of a piece that confirms Russia is light years ahead of NATO’s military establishment. His opening paragraphs summarize his piece:
Attritional wars require their own ‘Art of War’ and are fought with a ‘force-centric’ approach, unlike wars of manoeuvre which are ‘terrain-focused’. They are rooted in massive industrial capacity to enable the replacement of losses, geographical depth to absorb a series of defeats, and technological conditions that prevent rapid ground movement. In attritional wars, military operations are shaped by a state’s ability to replace losses and generate new formations, not tactical and operational manoeuvres. The side that accepts the attritional nature of war and focuses on destroying enemy forces rather than gaining terrain is most likely to win.
The West is not prepared for this kind of war. To most Western experts, attritional strategy is counterintuitive. Historically, the West preferred the short ‘winner takes all’ clash of professional armies. Recent war games such as CSIS’s war over Taiwan covered one month of fighting. The possibility that the war would go on never entered the discussion. This is a reflection of a common Western attitude. Wars of attrition are treated as exceptions, something to be avoided at all costs and generally products of leaders’ ineptitude. Unfortunately, wars between near-peer powers are likely to be attritional, thanks to a large pool of resources available to replace initial losses. The attritional nature of combat, including the erosion of professionalism due to casualties, levels the battlefield no matter which army started with better trained forces. As conflict drags on, the war is won by economies, not armies. States that grasp this and fight such a war via an attritional strategy aimed at exhausting enemy resources while preserving their own are more likely to win. The fastest way to lose a war of attrition is to focus on manoeuvre, expending valuable resources on near-term territorial objectives. Recognising that wars of attrition have their own art is vital to winning them without sustaining crippling losses..........more.........
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)