there's a lot more to ww2 history than you'll ever learn in a school here in the empire. history is written by the victors and the true believers get real upset when you challenge them on it;
"The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end." (The Jewish newspaper, Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland, September 13, 1939)
go large or get ready for your new and improved slavery;
https://eatgrueldog.wordpress.com/2021/11/24/the-right-state-at-the-right-time/
this woman is lucky she got this far. i've seen other incidents like this including one case in california in which the house was virtually destroyed, and the 'officials' said: 'tough luck you had there. can't do anything for you' and were supported by courts who refused to make the innocent whole;
A SWAT team destroyed an innocent woman’s house after a fugitive barricaded himself inside. Last week a federal court ruled that she can sue the government for damages.
In July 2020, Wesley Little—who Vicki Baker had terminated as her handyman about a year and a half prior—arrived at Baker’s home in McKinney, Texas. Baker’s daughter answered. Recognizing him from news reports that he was wanted for the abduction of a 15-year-old girl, she left the premises and called the police.
SWAT agents soon arrived. They set off explosives to open the garage entryway, detonated tear gas grenades inside the building, ran over Baker’s fence with an armored vehicle, and ripped off her front door, despite being given a garage door opener, a code to the back gate, and a key to the home. The house was unlivable when they were through.
She sued. So the city asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit.
“In its pursuit of the fugitive and pursuant to its police powers, Baker alleges the City caused significant economic damage—over $50,000—to her home. Then, the City refused to compensate her for the damage,” writes Judge Amos L. Mazzant III of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. “Baker has alleged damage to her private property—and the City’s refusal to compensate for such damage—that plausibly amounts to a Fifth Amendment violation.”
The fact that this needed to be spelled out is a commentary on how difficult it has become to get meaningful accountability from the government.The ability to do this sort of thing without accountability turns cops into nothing more than home invaders, hoodlums, gangsters and vandals. Those who do this are deserving of no respect at all. I would have been just fine if the cops perpetrating this had been shot.
They had no right to do this to anyone’s home...........https://www.captainsjournal.com/2021/11/30/a-swat-team-blew-up-this-innocent-womans-house-and-cost-her-over-50000-the-city-tried-to-stop-her-from-suing/
the realization of the apartheid reality in palestine is finally being accepted and acted upon by christian organizations and here's some evidence;
If you are looking to measure the past year’s dramatic rise in Americans’ awareness and rejection of the Israeli system that oppresses Palestinians, the November 20 vote by the Episcopalians of Chicago offers a metric. The annual convention of their diocese resolved, 72 percent to 28 percent, to call out Israel as meeting the legal definition of apartheid and to condemn that as “antithetical” to their values [text of the resolution below]. Just last year, in contrast, they had declined to pass virtually the same resolution, voting 58-42 against.
The Chicagoans’ big shift is part of a gathering wave of similar statements by so-called mainline, largely liberal, Christian denominations. Thus, only days earlier, Atlanta’s Presbyterians also declared — by a whopping 95 percent — that Israel meets the legal definition of apartheid.
But while the Chicago metric and Atlanta’s breakthrough may show that these denominations — which represent millions of churchgoers — are fed up with waiting for Israel to act like the democracy it claims to be, it’s still unclear whether this means the churches will become a stronger force for change. The question remains open whether their members will so take to heart the Palestinians’ cause that they will push church leaders to overcome their natural reluctance to wade into an acrimonious controversy in a dedicated way against longtime pro-Israel allies in the Jewish mainstream and in the Democratic Party establishment...........read more.......
