and you still think you have a lawful government;

the federalies are going after the second amendment using the back door;

this is a voyage thru the results of the current outbreaks in one grocery store;

Peter Sokolowski, an editor at large for the Merriam-Webster dictionary, told CNN that their definition of racism is being changed to “a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles” and “a political or social system founded on racism,” which would cover systematic racism and oppression.

“I think we can express this more clearly to bring the idea of an asymmetrical power structure into the language of this definition, but it’s there,” Sokolowski said.

For our purposes, the word symmetrical is noteworthy. But we feel it should be applied to outcomes or what’s really going in the field and not figments of the imagination and Weinstein clown world movies. It means two sides that don’t match — are uneven or out of whack.

Weinstein’s ‘Django,’ ‘Hateful 8’, ‘Inglorious Basterds’ A Wake-Up Call For Whites

Yes, we, too, feel this new definition opens the way toward a discussion and dialogue on race. One of the most compelling observations of racial behaviors was offered up by this black lady and mother who starkly described the impact on her life of runaway dinduism........read and watch more.......

there are good cops and bad cops. the problem is there's no mechanism to remove bad cops in any effective way. at the base of it all is, or should be, that as the primary focus;

• If you kill a black guy — you go to jail for murder.
• If you kill a white guy — you go to jail for murder.
• If you kill an asian guy — you go to jail for murder.

If a cop kills any of the above, he may or may not get suspended with pay.

It was never about race. It’s about police brutality and an out of control police force that basically is a gang of murderous brutal thugs that can commit crimes with impunity.

We all need to unite against this shit. The MAGAs, the left, the right, the center, everybody. Making it about race is so they can divide us. If it becomes all about BLM or just black people, then they stand a chance for NOTHING TO CHANGE. So they push that narrative. Many people buy into it............https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/does-it-piss-anyone-else-off-how-the-media-is-trying-to-make-the-protests-more-about-race-than-about-police-brutality/

for less than a minute you can watch trump the dot head warrior;


https://youtu.be/3Dy1C95p00E

clear and simple;

i've gotten this far and already love how this writer is presenting these facts;

One of the most disturbing aspects of American foreign policy since 9/11 has been the assumption that decisions made by the United States are binding on the rest of the world, best exemplified by President George W. Bush’s warning that “there was a new sheriff in town.” Apart from time of war, no other nation has ever sought to prevent other nations from trading with each other, nor has any government sought to punish foreigners using sanctions with the cynical arrogance demonstrated by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. The United States uniquely seeks to penalize other sovereign countries for alleged crimes that did not occur in the U.S. and that did not involve American citizens, while also insisting that all nations must comply with whatever penalties are meted out by Washington. At the same time, it demonstrates its own hypocrisy by claiming sovereign immunity whenever foreigners or even American citizens seek to use the courts to hold it accountable for its many crimes.

The conceit by the United States that it is the acknowledged judge, jury and executioner in policing the international community began in the post-World War 2 environment, when hubristic American presidents began referring to themselves as “leaders of the free world.” This pretense received legislative and judicial backing with passage of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987 (ATA) as amended in 1992 plus subsequent related legislation, to include the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act of 2016 (JASTA). The body of legislation can be used to obtain civil judgments against alleged terrorists for attacks carried out anywhere in the world and can be employed to punish governments, international organizations and even corporations that are perceived to be supportive of terrorists, even indirectly or unknowingly. Plaintiffs are able to sue for injuries to their “person, property, or business” and have ten years to bring a claim............https://www.globalresearch.ca/america-supernational-sovereignty/5716014