the title of this, the real purpose of public schooling, tells you much of what you will be made aware of, should you not be as of now;


Leave it to the Chinese Communist Party and the New York Times to indirectly teach Americans about public schooling. In an article entitled “The High School Course Beijing Accuses of Radicalizing Hong Kong,” the Times writes:

China’s ruling Communist Party has long seen education as a crucial ideological tool for nurturing loyal citizens. Under Xi Jinping, the country’s authoritarian leader, the party has ramped up patriotic education on the mainland, helping shape one of the nationalist generations of youth that the country has seen in years…. In recent months, officials in Beijing have repeatedly stressed the need for stronger patriotic education in Hong Kong.

What the Times and U.S. government officials will never admit is that that is precisely the purpose of public (i.e., government) schooling here in the United States – to produce good, little citizens who are “patriotic,” loyal to the state, defer to their political rulers, and blindly support important decisions made by U.S. officials, especially with respect to foreign affairs.
And who can dispute that the public schooling system here in the United States has been just as successful in achieving its goal as Chinese officials have been in mainland China? With its mandatory-attendance laws and government-approved textbooks and curriculum, and its army-lite system of regimentation and control, the U.S. public-school system has produced a nation of people whose love of country is measured by their unwavering and loyal support of the government’s troops, who they never hesitate to thank for their “service,” regardless of what that “service” happens to be..........https://www.fff.org/2019/09/03/the-real-purpose-of-public-schooling/

a short video showing you what the mall of america, in minnesota looks like these days, but you might wonder where all of the norwegians went;


https://youtu.be/u6fQI_qB1JE

in less than a minute in this netanyahoo video from the nineties you see him making a prediction. there are some who make a clear case that israel was involved in 911 and this could be considered evidence;


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QMLO558gec&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3RcleijBXjiVlc7hcg0LhfPlFhcOgNdhoRWQs3zbfDhOOaBt_hSwS3314

good points are made here about compromise when it comes to your rights;

People often ask me why I am so unwilling to “compromise” on gun control. In reality, I’m not. A compromise is supposed to mean both sides of an argument get something out of the deal. Neither side gets everything they want, but they both at least get something.

When people ask me what I would be willing to compromise on, I give them a simple answer: I would trade tougher background checks in exchange for nationwide concealed-carry reciprocity. If we are going to create a system where every gun purchaser is fully vetted through the FBI’s background check system, then we should give those vetted and trusted gun owners the right to carry their guns nationwide.

Gun control advocates usually gasp when I make this recommendation, as if the thought of actually having to agree to pro-gun reforms has never crossed their minds. The answer I get is almost always a hard “no,” and that tells me everything I need to know about the gun control movement’s intentions. Every gun control bill that passes is just one step toward an ultimate goal...........https://thefederalist.com/2019/08/22/compromise-gun-laws-always-mean-gun-control-wins/

it 1984 when one anonymous phone call can cause police to descend on your house, seize your firearms, and shoot you if you resist, then you no longer live in a nation of laws but one moving towards controlling every step you make and every word you utter and its here every day though your tv won't tell you that, in this way. you have one set of laws for the members of the government and another set for everyone else, you are not being governed, you are being ruled.

another item i haven't yet read beyond this bit below, but further reading is certainly in the cards as it seems to be what our future is, or as the red queen, and trump also said: verdict first, trial later;


Spare me the talking points on the legal limits of RFL at the present time. All they needed to do for now is get the laws into place. Rest assured they will be administratively and bureaucratically tweaked and adjusted so that it gets easier for the boys wearing the Oakleys to kick your door in, and those bureaucratic and administrative tweaks will make it harder and more expensive for you to get your guns back. Assuming that you ever get them back at all..........https://www.americanpartisan.org/2019/08/are-the-new-red-flag-laws-the-gun-grab-weve-been-warned-about/

ain't even read this yet but tell us this sentence below ain't so;


Every single allegedly neutral, nonpartisan, super-professional institution has turned out to be, in fact, a bunch of partisan hacks shilling for the permanent political party..........https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/340363/