witnesses say they saw different things happening than the tv tells you in elpaso;


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HZTxgcShfI

seems clear to me;

here is an exploration of 'our' shootings and the possibly realities;

It has been our contention that the majority of mass casualty events are fake or synthetic hoaxes. There may be a small degree of hybrids events used as cover to eliminate targeted individuals. Since the term “hoax” seems to get a pejorative reaction (similar to “conspiracy theory”), perhaps a better term to use is “staged deception.”

The reason staged deceptions are preferred — meaning not involving real deaths or a limited number of deaths — is primarily because real victims or their survivors go off the rails and can’t be controlled. Real false flags with real death gets very messy, whereas staged deceptions can be directed and manipulated. Fakes can and do read off of a script.

Plus, owning the victimhood franchise, or “victim stance,” is extremely effective and valuable for four reasons: 1) beating back those who question the anomalies (the gaslighting, one-trick-pony, “you’re crazy” accusation); 2) maximizing charity frauds and government-funded loots; 3) demonizing target groups or peoples; and 4) forcing problem-reaction-solution control agendas. One such example of late is “control of the Internet,” “pre-crime” intervention and hauling targets into mental health facilities.

The following 21-item staged-deception detection checklist offers more detail. There is only a little variation between events, and they follow a familiar wash-rinse-repeat pattern and scripts such as “manifestos”.

No. 1: A staged drill for a similar type of event happening at the same time and/or nearby place.

https://www.winterwatch.net/2019/08/why-are-staged-deceptions-used-more-than-pure-false-flags/

for six minutes brother nathanael speaks about the mossad, epstein and such matters as zionism;


http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=193156

an interesting thought;

more dead kids after the cops decided to protect you;


Oklahoma City, OK — As TFTP reported in April, a rather disturbing scene unfolded in Oklahoma City as police officers attempting to kill a robbery suspect opened fire on four small children, shooting three of them. Now, the family and residents are demanding answers and the mother says the children have a long way to go before they are healed.
According to WPSD, medical records say a bullet pierced the left frontal lobe of 4-year-old Asia Jacobs’ brain. Her 5-year-old brother suffered a skull fracture and her 1-year-old sister was left with deep facial cuts. Asia’s 2-year-old brother was not hit.
The children’s mother, Olivia Hill, says: “Emotionally, they’re not OK. Physically, they’re here.”
Not until six days after the shooting did police release any information as to what happened. While they have refused to elaborate on any video of the incident, we now know that the suspect William Devaughn Smith, 21, did not fire on police before police opened fire on the truck full of children. Also, we now know that police were in an unmarked car and not in uniform when they approached Smith.
According to police, they saw Smith in his pickup truck with the four children last Friday and when they made contact with him, they began shooting after they claim he tried to flee. Police claim that Smith attempted to run them over with the truck. However, as TFTP has reported on countless occasions, this defense is used all the time when cops could’ve simply stepped to the side and allowed the driver to leave — especially if there are four small children inside.
What’s more, Smith told the Associated Press he didn’t hit either detective, and the truck was parked when he was shot.
Hill’s lawyer backs up this claim and says two Hugo detectives fired at least 26 shots into a stationary truck full of kids...........https://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/cops-still-not-charged-after-dumping-26-rounds-into-truck-full-of-small-children-shooting-3-of-them/252258

if you focus upon the shootings the tv tells you about you're missing the greater problem: police, and here mr whitehead will speak to you about that;

“It is often the case that police shootings, incidents where law enforcement officers pull the trigger on civilians, are left out of the conversation on gun violence. But a police officer shooting a civilian counts as gun violence. Every time an officer uses a gun against an innocent or an unarmed person contributes to the culture of gun violence in this country.”—Journalist Celisa Calacal

Yes, gun violence is a problem in America, although violent crime generally remains at an all-time low.
Yes, mass shootings are a problem in America, although while they are getting deadlier, they are not getting more frequent.
Yes, mentally ill individuals embarking on mass shooting sprees are a problem in America.
However, tighter gun control laws and so-called “intelligent” background checks fail to protect the public from the most egregious perpetrator of gun violence in America: the U.S. government.
Consider that five years after police shot and killed an unarmed 18-year-old man in Ferguson, Missouri, there has been no relief from the government’s gun violence..........https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/08/john-w-whitehead/who-inflicts-the-most-gun-violence-in-america-the-u-s-government-and-its-police-forces/