are you anti-semitic?;


We begin this week’s edition of ‘Jewish War on Free Speech’ with the news that Deborah Lipstadt – who pretends to be an ‘expert’ on the ‘Holocaust’ but doesn’t even seem to know any significant details of the so-called ‘Holocaust’ – has been engaging in her real occupation of shrieking about so-called ‘anti-Semitism’ and this week she has been delightfully comparing it to herpes – with which she is clearly intimately acquainted – and claiming that it ‘cannot be wiped out’ because it is ‘irrational’. (1)

It apparently hasn’t ever occurred to Lipstadt that jewish behaviour is the principle cause of ‘anti-Semitism’ and even if it did then it would have quickly dismissed as an ‘irrational’ thought, because as we all know the chosen people can do no wrong.

Instead of searching for meaningful answers to the issue of so-called ‘anti-Semitism’ jews – of which Lipstadt is a prime example - shriek about the need for ‘initiatives’ to ‘combat anti-Semitism’ for which they need ‘funding’ from concerned jewish billionaires – such as Robert Kraft (2) and Roman Abramovich – (3) and eternally shift the definition of ‘anti-Semitism’ to include any and all criticism of jews, Judaism and/or the state of Israel. (4)

The method these jewish ‘experts on hate’ – who have rarely done any real research on what their opponents say but rather simply waffle on in general platitudes and historical claims made by the existing literature on ‘anti-Semitism’ – use is to create the illusion of authority behind their claims – such as the ‘Working Definition of Anti-Semitism’ outlined by the ‘International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’ (hereafter IHRA), which is actually a pro-Israel think-tank despite the neutral-sounding name) – and then demand adherence to these claimed ‘international standards’. (5)

This ‘international standard’ is then used as a means to broaden the ‘definition’ of ‘anti-Semitism’ and by so-doing attack even the most milquetoast of Israel’s critics let lone international jewry’s multitude of self-created enemies by both jewish groups (6) and the state of Israel itself. (7)

The ‘rising level’ of ‘anti-Semitism’ calculated using this impossibly broad definition provided by the IHRA is then used as the ‘justification’ behind draconian new laws designed to criminalize any criticism of jews, Judaism and/or the state of Israel (8) using any random incident involving jews as the victim as a clarion call (9) and shut down (10) – and preferably imprison – (11) said critics.

Add to that calls for special government-funded armed security for jews when the inevitable blow back occurs (12) and a bit of anti-gentile iconoclasm (13) and you’ve got the ‘Jewish War on Free Speech’ for this week...........http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/
 

brother nathanael asks is it really the jews who run things;


http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=190863

four minute video showing state police conspiring to frame an individual;


https://youtu.be/oVCgCHnmjSY

seven minute video i found entertaining starts with a funny boy reacting to beto speaking spanish at the 'debates' and ends with anderson cooper interviewing the latest victim of the mango mussolini speaking of his attempting to rape her;


https://youtu.be/L_MLs8MRPzc

fred on everything covers where we are and some of how we got here;

Today, FOE will explain economics, fraud, unemployment, and the end of the world. There will no longer be a need for economists, if there ever was. You will understand everything.

FOE is that sort of column.

Long ago, everybody worked on farms, growing food. This was a real service. People wanted food. They liked to eat it. At the same time, there was a tremendous demand for refrigerators and cars. People didn’t know they wanted these things because they hadn’t been invented. But they wanted them anyway.

Then farming automated, so everybody went to work in factories, making the refrigerators and cars, which they now had the money to buy. These products were not as important as food, but reasonably important.

Then the factories automated, so everybody started nail salons or tanning spas. Well, only some started them. But employment followed Fred’s Law of Declining Utility. People who didn’t have nail salons became lawyers, PR executives, professors and diversity consultants. These usually had no utility at all, but they kept their practitioners from being obviously unemployed. This, the prevention of evident pointlessness, became more and more central to the economy. Thus psychotherapy, grief counseling, and pet grooming.

Along the way, there flourished other means of keeping people off the job market without anyone’s noticing. Universities expanded, warehousing in custodial care millions of young who had neither interest in education, the intelligence to undertake it, nor much idea what it was. Then came the student-loan scam, the moral equivalent of sharecropping, that both facilitated students’ isolation from workaday reality . It also provided a steady stream of money for banks..........http://www.unz.com/freed/leisure-unsought-neural-networks-and-other-dramas/

iran is making the khazars crazier than they have previously been and this article explores how the russians seem to be dealing with that and how it may stop the khazar tricks this time;

While the global political system can no longer be described as essentially unilateral characterising the post-cold-war era of the 1990s and early 2000s, unilateralism nonetheless continues to characterise US behaviour whereby it unilaterally withdraws from multilateral treaties and/or agreements and unilaterally threatens to “obliterate” an entire country i.e, Iran. If the global political system is to truly become multipolar, this unilateralism cannot be warranted. This is precisely what Russia’s top-most political brass had in mind when they went for the G-20 summit in Osaka, Japan, where Russian Vladimir Putin held a meeting with the US president Donald Trump and discussed issues, ranging from bi-lateral ties and global strategic situation to Syria, Afghanistan, and most importantly, Iran. While it is not yet clear what exactly went in that meeting, it is by far crystal-clear what Putin must have told Trump about Iran. Russian officials had, as a matter of fact, revealed their position in a few interviews before the start of the summit in Japan.

For instance, in an interview, Russian Permanent Representative to International Organisations in Vienna Mikhail Ulyanov called US policies a direct blackmailing saying that “by the means of blackmailing and intimidation, Washington is chasing large foreign companies, and not large alone, away from the Iranian market.”

Ulyanov sounded in favour of Iran when he said that Iran’s decision to stop implementing provisions of JCPOA was in accordance with the agreement’s own provisions and that it had every right to do if other parties were failing to fulfil their obligations. Of course, Ulyanov also called on Iran not to invoke those provisions and continue to abide by the agreement. This, of course, does not mean that Russian endorses US “blackmailing” of Iran. Russian president has already announced that they are ready to help Iran export its crude and ease restrictions on its banking system if Europe fails to launch its dollar-evading SPV, Instex (Instrument in Support of Trade Exchanges) with Tehran...........https://journal-neo.org/2019/06/30/g-20-russia-iran-and-the-bid-to-end-u-s-unilateralism/

engdahl always seems to have his hands on current events in a way beyond many i read, and here he speaks of the fed and the mango mussolini dealing with economic futures;


As of beginning July 2019 prospects look positive for a re-election of Donald Trump as President in November 2020. Headline stock market and GDP figures all look positive…at the present. The huge unanswered question is whether that can be sustained until the fateful elections. We see signs already that spell potential trouble for the Republicans .
A major problem for the Trump prospects to win a second term in November 2020 is the fact that since 1913 no American President, nor the Congress, control the decisions of the central bank, the legendary Federal Reserve or Fed. What few are aware of is the fact that the Fed is not a government agency. This is despite the fact the President nominates persons to serve as directors. The reality is that the Fed is privately owned largely by the international banks and financial groups that control global money flows. They determine in complex ways the control of US money creation, the heart of the economy.
In December 1913 a cabal of Wall Street Republican international bankers led by J.P. Morgan, John D Rockefeller, Paul Warburg and cronies pulled off the fateful coup d’etat that saw “Democrat” Woodrow Wilson sign away the money power of the government to the bankers. Since then, the Fed has determined the course of the nation’s economy independent of the interests of the national economy or the citizens.
The President of the New York Fed, Benjamin Strong, as head of the most powerful of the 12 reserve banks, literally determined the fate of the US and Europe until his death in 1928. His interest rate policies were directly responsible for creating the 1920s stock market bubble and the October 1929 Wall Street Great Crash. That in turn led to the 1931 global banking crisis and the Great Depression. It was the Fed under Allan Greenspan that was responsible for the creation of the securitization USA housing bubble and also for its deliberate destruction into the “Great Recession” of 2007-2008, a key factor in the 2008 Obama win. This Fed is the real power over economic good times or bad.
It can be demonstrated that every recession or boom, every so-called business cycle since 1914 has been determined by the Fed. When Donald Trump became President he selected several directors of the Fed Board of Governors, including Chairman Jerome Powell beginning February 2018, apparently believing Powell would continue an easy money regimen.
When Powell and the Fed continued the Janet Yellen interest rate increases and withdrawal from Quantitative Easing by selling off the assets it bought after the 2008 financial crisis, the effects were initially overshadowed by the Trump tax law and other factors that spurred both the stock market, the dollar and the economy. By late 2018, however, it began to become clear that the Fed was on course to create a collapse of the post-2008 asset bubble in stocks and real estate, prompting unprecedented criticism from Donald Trump of Jerome Powell, his choice for Fed chairman.
By December 2018, almost a year into Powell’s term, financial markets appeared in freefall, the stock markets down by 30% in six weeks, junk bond markets freezing and oil prices down by 40%. At that point on the urging of a group of influential business people, Trump began to attack Powell for trying to create a new recession..........http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO30June2019.php