six minutes of george carlin telling you about the illusion of freedom in america;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cg6Ku3rRnY
i began this blogspot to save sending emails to all i suspected might need or want to review: avoid being a spammer. so consider these things i thought you might find interest in. if you like what you see, pass it on. If the power elites didn’t need the consent of the public to rule, they wouldn’t have to lie constantly about their reasons for their wars on everyone. as gore vidal said: i'm not a conspiracy theorist, i'm a conspiracy observer.
Friday, October 12, 2018
me too has a lot of validity and at the same time stereotyping any group also has its downfalls. the following article demonstrates that all females aren't always victims and the rush to lynch those who are accused isn't anything any of us really will want;
A parent lawsuit put at them, which they are very likely to lose, is about to show just how incompetent and malevolent they really are as they allowed a pack of teenage "mean girls" to accuse, toss into the court system, and detain a teenage boy that the big one among them "didn't like to look at."
Here is what the parents say happened to him:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/10/mean_girls_and_stupid_bureaucrats_what_could_go_wrong.html#ixzz5Td8wlZkK
Mean girls and stupid bureaucrats. What could go wrong?
Do the Seneca Valley School District's abundant educational bureaucrats know anything at all about teenage girls?A parent lawsuit put at them, which they are very likely to lose, is about to show just how incompetent and malevolent they really are as they allowed a pack of teenage "mean girls" to accuse, toss into the court system, and detain a teenage boy that the big one among them "didn't like to look at."
Here is what the parents say happened to him:
The 26-page lawsuit alleges that a former Seneca Valley High School student, referred to only as T.F., "was forced to endure multiple court appearances, detention in a juvenile facility, detention at home, the loss of his liberty and other damages until several of the girls reluctantly admitted that their accusations were false."Here are the awful details of how it happened, according to the Belleville Intelligencer:
Michael J. and Alecia Flood of Zelienople brought the suit on behalf of their son, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is reporting.
The suit alleges that the five girls – called "Mean Girls" in the suit after the 2004 Lindsay Lohan comedy – "conspired in person and via electronic communication devices to falsely accuse T.F. of sexual assault on two occasions."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/10/mean_girls_and_stupid_bureaucrats_what_could_go_wrong.html#ixzz5Td8wlZkK
orwell's predictions roll forward with little effective resistance, and this article will show you how its being done now, 'in a world where' free speech is but isn't at the same time;
Facebook has purged more dissident political media pages today, this time under the pretense of protecting its users from “inauthentic activity”. In a statement co-authored by Facebook Head of Cybersecurity Nathaniel Gleicher (who also happens to be the former White House National Security Council Director of Cybersecurity Policy), the massive social media platform explained that it has removed “559 Pages and 251 accounts that have consistently broken our rules against spam and coordinated inauthentic behavior.”
This “inauthentic behavior”, according to Facebook, consists of using “sensational political content – regardless of its political slant – to build an audience and drive traffic to their websites,” which is the same as saying they write about controversial things, and posting those political articles “in dozens of Facebook Groups, often hundreds of times in a short period, to drum up traffic for their websites.”
In other words, the pages were removed for publishing controversial political content and trying to get people to read it. Not for writing “fake news”, but for doing what they could to get legitimate indie media news stories viewed by people who might want to view it. The practice of sharing your material around in Facebook groups is common practice for most independent media content creators; I did it myself a lot in late 2016 and early 2017, and pretty much all my indie media peers at the time did too.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2018/10/12/facebook-twitter-purge-more-dissident-media-pages-in-latest-escalation/
Facebook has purged more dissident political media pages today, this time under the pretense of protecting its users from “inauthentic activity”. In a statement co-authored by Facebook Head of Cybersecurity Nathaniel Gleicher (who also happens to be the former White House National Security Council Director of Cybersecurity Policy), the massive social media platform explained that it has removed “559 Pages and 251 accounts that have consistently broken our rules against spam and coordinated inauthentic behavior.”
This “inauthentic behavior”, according to Facebook, consists of using “sensational political content – regardless of its political slant – to build an audience and drive traffic to their websites,” which is the same as saying they write about controversial things, and posting those political articles “in dozens of Facebook Groups, often hundreds of times in a short period, to drum up traffic for their websites.”
In other words, the pages were removed for publishing controversial political content and trying to get people to read it. Not for writing “fake news”, but for doing what they could to get legitimate indie media news stories viewed by people who might want to view it. The practice of sharing your material around in Facebook groups is common practice for most independent media content creators; I did it myself a lot in late 2016 and early 2017, and pretty much all my indie media peers at the time did too.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2018/10/12/facebook-twitter-purge-more-dissident-media-pages-in-latest-escalation/
Thursday, October 11, 2018
i've been to walmart fewer times than i have fingers. i detest what they do to employees, customers and the towns they take over putting local business out of business. the following article may cause you to reconsider your shopping plans as well;
AOL – by Betsy Mikel
http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/walmart-just-made-an-announcement-that-may-make-you-never-want-to-shop-there-again/234575
AOL – by Betsy Mikel
Walmart has plenty of haters. But for many consumers,
Walmart’s prices just can’t be beat. You can’t afford to be choosey when
you’re on a tight budget.
If price is not so much of a concern for you, what if you
discovered that Walmart wants your personal data? And not just data
about your shopping behavior, which we already give hand-over-fist to
Amazon in the name of fast shipping.
Walmart is interested in what’s going on in your body while you shop.
The want to collect this data is a particularly creepy way:
through the handles of their shopping carts. The company recently
submitted a patent to the U.S. Patent and Trademark office called System And Method For A Biometric Feedback Cart Handle, CBInsights reports.
These innovative shopping cart handles would collect your biometric
data, meaning your stress level, your body temperature, and heart rate —
all while you’re strolling through the aisles of your local store,
filling your cart with Walmart’s everyday low-priced items.Putting positive spin on data collection
Walmart is wisely putting a positive spin on why they want to collect shoppers’ biometric data.
Say someone was unwell while shopping in one of their
stores. Their pulse becomes erratic or their temperature drastically
changes. The shopping cart handle would transmit this info real-time to a
server, which would then notify a Walmart associate to go check on the
person.
That sounds awfully altruistic for Walmart. It’s probably
not the only reason America’s largest retailer wants to collect
information about what’s happening inside the minds and bodies of
consumers while they shop.
http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/walmart-just-made-an-announcement-that-may-make-you-never-want-to-shop-there-again/234575
ten minute video and an article where they evidently don't know they're being 'filmed' and they admit lying is their way to avoid being held to a particular 'value';
(Tennessee) Project Veritas Action Fund has released a second undercover video from campaigns during this 2018 election season. This report exposes Tennessee staffers from Phil Bredesen’s U.S. Senate campaign revealing his willingness to court moderate voters through deceit. This was especially evidenced by Bredesen’s recent statement suggesting he would, if he was already in the Senate, vote to confirm now Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
James O’Keefe, founder and president of Project Veritas Action, said this report should represent a red flag for all Tennessee voters:
Maria Amalla and Will Stewart, staffers in Bredesen’s campaign, both say on hidden camera that if he were in the Senate, Bredesen would not actually have voted to confirm then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. They explained that the statement Bredesen issued in support of Kavanaugh was a political ploy to gain the support of moderate voters in Tennessee.
https://www.projectveritasaction.com/2018/10/10/we-dont-say-that-out-of-these-walls-phil-bredesens-staff-says-he-is-lying-about-kavanaugh-vote-in-undercover-video-its-a-political-move/
(Tennessee) Project Veritas Action Fund has released a second undercover video from campaigns during this 2018 election season. This report exposes Tennessee staffers from Phil Bredesen’s U.S. Senate campaign revealing his willingness to court moderate voters through deceit. This was especially evidenced by Bredesen’s recent statement suggesting he would, if he was already in the Senate, vote to confirm now Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
James O’Keefe, founder and president of Project Veritas Action, said this report should represent a red flag for all Tennessee voters:
Phil Bredesen and his campaign have been shown to lie to Tennesseans, saying one thing to persuade voters on the campaign trail but clearly planning to do something entirely different should he get into office.Lying to Persuade Moderate Voters
Maria Amalla and Will Stewart, staffers in Bredesen’s campaign, both say on hidden camera that if he were in the Senate, Bredesen would not actually have voted to confirm then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. They explained that the statement Bredesen issued in support of Kavanaugh was a political ploy to gain the support of moderate voters in Tennessee.
https://www.projectveritasaction.com/2018/10/10/we-dont-say-that-out-of-these-walls-phil-bredesens-staff-says-he-is-lying-about-kavanaugh-vote-in-undercover-video-its-a-political-move/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)