fraud?

 

It’s said that “everything is bigger in Texas.”

Does this include the vote fraud?

Critics are thus wondering after Democrat James Talarico flipped a Texas Senate seat “blue” on Tuesday in a landslide.

Oh, it’s not just that Talarico outperformed the RealClear Politics polling average by almost 10 points. (Historically it’s Republicans who under-poll, not Democrats.)

It’s not just that he won despite having held radical-left views (there are “six sexes,” “transitioning” kids is good, etc.)

It’s also that Talarico got more Texas votes than Democratic presidential nominees Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, and Joe Biden.

It’s that even if not one person supported Talarico on Election Day, he still would have won. (I.e., he got more early and mail-in votes than his opponent, Ken Paxton, received in total.)

And it’s that Texas processed almost three million “new valid voter registrations” between 2022 and 2024 without proof of citizenship. (Texas only requires people to “attest” that they’re U.S. citizens under penalty of perjury.)

None of this alone establishes proof of vote fraud, of course. But it is, well, curious.

Now, before proceeding, I must address the standard legacy-media and Democrat scoffing. It’s ridiculous thinking significant fraud occurred, they’ll say; it’s tin-foil-hat lunatic talk. Except that there’s this:.........more..........