larry johnson is presenting another charlie murder theory. so far i'm voting for the exploding lavalier mike;

Chris Martenson is out with a terrific video analysis that rebuts many of the false claims circulating on social media about who shot Charlie Kirk. Martenson proves beyond a reasonable doubt that it was not a .30-06 round that took Charlie’s life. I am posting below a video of a dummy composed of ballistic gel and a human skull that is a sickening illustration of the actual power of the .30-06. It also was not a pistol of any kind, especially the alleged palm pistol.

What about the alleged exploding microphone? Debunked as well. If you have ever had the chance to fire a revolver or a semi-automatic pistol, you would know there is this phenomena called recoil. Recoil from a pistol round is the backward movement or kick a shooter feels when the pistol is fired. This force results from the conservation of momentum: as the bullet and expanding gases are propelled forward, the pistol itself is pushed backward with equal force in the opposite direction. The amount of recoil depends on the mass and velocity of both the bullet and gases, as well as the mass of the pistol. In technical terms, recoil is a physical response to Newton’s third law, and is mathematically defined as the product of the mass and acceleration of the ejecta (bullet and gases), reversed and imparted to the gun. This force is experienced by the shooter as an impulse, which they must absorb and counteract, resulting in a noticeable rearward “kick” from each shot. The same applies to the microphone. If that microphone had launched a projectile at Charlie’s neck, the microphone should have moved violently to Charlie’s right… It did no such thing..........more.............