this presentation is a bit longer than i usually post but i suspect it is a good ''rundown" of the covid game from motivation to 'installation' including who and why;
My thinking on all matters relating to the “Fauci virus” and the “Fauci Trojan horse bio-weapon” took a deep dive over the weekend, due to a sequence of recent Austrian government proclamations, one following upon the other, starting with “no more tests” for the “un-vaxxed” which, permissible over the summer months, allowed all the Untermenschen inhabiting this country to frequent restaurants, cafés, health clubs, etc. This followed by another “lockdown” this time just for the Untermenschen, which was then followed by general “lockdown” for all, ensuring the scolding anger of all the holy vaxxed that the Untermenschen are the cause of this newly instituted misery. Following which a universal vaccine mandate was proclaimed by the idiot parading as “Chancellor” with February 1, 2022 as the cut-off date for one and all to get the death/sick-inducing jab.
Over the weekend, I spent most of the time on the phone, speaking with Austrian friends, Serbian friends, a friend from Chile and long-time friends in the USA. An Austrian friend, also un-vaxxed to-date for some odd reason did an odd switch to suddenly playing “devil’s advocate” and asked me why I always see everything so “black and white” and why I do not have a more balanced view of this whole “covid” thing?
“Balanced” I asked him? What can possibly be meant by a “balanced” view of something like this? What am I to balance here? Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and Klaus Schwab to be “balanced” with Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Judy Mikovits, Michael Yeadon? Essentially a “balancing” here between “evil” and “good,” no? The more I thought about it, the more I realised that the idea of injecting “balance” in to this “conversation” was nothing more than an outrage (and for me, not within the bounds of common sense and logic). The word here is “CHOICE” and not (no, never) “BALANCE”. One must of necessity CHOOSE between “good” and “evil” and the idea of BALANCING OUT these two opposites is for me at least, nothing less than an acceptance of “evil” into whatever mixture results...........read more........
No comments:
Post a Comment