According to the agency South Front, the
United States has transported approximately 50 tons of gold from the
regions occupied by ISIS in the Deir ez-Zor Governorate. The Kurdish
news source reports that the gold was stolen from Syria, and
subsequently stored in an American military base, located in Ayn
al-Arab. In addition, the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) stated that
U.S. forces had been transporting large chests filled with ISIS gold
from the al-Dashisha area in the southern part of the Al-Hasakah
Governorate.
Furthermore, the United Kingdom-based
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) reported that ISIS members in
the Euphrates region were in possession of approximately 40 tons of
gold, which the terrorists used to buy a safe passage out of the region,
surrounded by forces supported by the United States. As a rule,
American military personnel received payments for allowing terrorists to
leave the area without a hassle, and they subsequently handed over this
money at their base. SOHR also claimed that the coalition, headed by
the United States, did not attack the territory occupied by ISIS
“deliberately”, and as a result, then received money from outlaws and
terrorists. After all according to the saying “Money does not stink,”
hence, the U.S. band of looters and bribe takers became even richer.
If someone actually believes that
Americans had only recently begun to accept gold from terrorists and
transfer it to U.S. coffers, they are sadly mistaken. Irrespective of
who the President of the United States is at any given time, these
leaders have always believed that stealing money and gold ingots from
others is a “noble pursuit”. And there are plenty of examples that
support this claim.
For instance, we could remind our
readers about the gold and the vast amount in dollars that belonged to
the Filipino dictator Ferdinand Marcos. During the fight for the
“happiness of his people,” Ferdinand Marcos and his family did not
forget about their own needs. Their possessions included various
thriving businesses involved in the manufacturing and service sectors,
which were owned by their relatives and acquaintances. In 1985,
The Mercury News, a local newspaper based in San Jose, published a
series of sensational articles that attempted to describe the method
used by this “first couple” to accumulate so much wealth, with
particular emphasis on spheres connected with the United States. The
publication was unable to identify all of the sources of Ferdinand
Marcos’s wealth, but up until now the amount of money, belonging to him,
is estimated to be somewhere below $10 billion.
Once Ferdinand Marcos was deposed as
president, Swiss banks froze his family’s accounts, on request from
Washington, and then refused to acknowledge the suit filed by the new
Filipino government because it lacked legal grounds. Hence, these banks
did not accept that the deposited funds belonged to the Philippines. By
August 1987, the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) filed
35 suits against the former president, his wife and 300 individuals
close to him, in order to seek compensation for the financial losses
supposedly suffered by the government, totaling $90 billion, which, as
uncovered later, was transferred to the United States...........https://journal-neo.org/2019/03/18/usa-behaving-as-true-looters/
No comments:
Post a Comment