as part of this post you can watch tulsi gabbard explain why she sees the dumocorps in this fashion;

Former Democrat Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii had some harsh words for the Dems during a recent appearance on the Laura Ingraham show.

The segment was about why people are leaving the Democrat party, and Gabbard had a long list of reasons, but one hits the left particularly hard.

Gabbard called the Democrats ‘warmongers.’

Think back to the presidency of George W. Bush, when the left claimed to be an anti-war movement and compare it to today’s Democrats who are cheering for war in Ukraine.

Think about the way that the left is now talking about the possibility of nuclear war, as if it would just be another conflict.

Gabbard makes some excellent points here.

Partial transcript via Breitbart News:

Gabbard: Democratic Party ‘an Elitist Cabal of Warmongers — Corrupt Politicians, Propaganda Media, Big Tech and the National Security State’

Friday on Fox News Channel’s “The Ingraham Angle,” former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard decried her former political party as tearing the country apart...........more.........

i once thought the dumocorps were just stupid, but now i will include evil in that judgement; 

Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes was sentenced on Thursday in Washington DC.

Far-left Obama-appointed US District Judge Amit Mehta on Thursday sentenced Rhodes to 18 years in federal prison.  This was after he added extra years to his sentence because he believed Rhodes’ actions amounted to terrorism. This was completely ludicrous. The soulless judge then lectured him on what a danger he was to society.

Mehta sentenced Stewart Rhodes to 18 years.  Rhodes is currently 57.  If this unconstitutional conviction stands, Rhodes will be 75 when he is released.

Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes NEVER went inside the US Capitol on January 6. He never instructed anyone to go inside the US Capitol. He was unarmed as were all of his Oath Keeper associates that day.  There was no plan to enter the US Capitol.  There was no scheme to take over the government with their bare hands.  There were no pre-planning meetings on how they were going to take over the Capitol.  The prosecution was a sham.  There was no evidence.  The jury was a pool of DC Communists and unhinged left-wing activists who see themselves as victims..........more..........

 every time the empire gets its nose into the affairs of another country we end up with a section of our country filled with the refugees we've created. the trouble changes course when they continue to act as they did where ever they came from. in some cases that's not a problem but in this case it is. a major city here in the empire is now somali with all the cultural changes involved. this post covers one aspect of the results;

When hearing about rival Somali political factions rioting, one might assume the event occurred in Somalia, where political violence is the norm. But the mayhem in question actually was in Minneapolis, where, increasingly, being Somali is the norm. (Apparently, “Minnesota nice” hasn’t rubbed off.)

Per The Post Millennial:

A riot erupted in Minnesota during Democrat nominations for Minneapolis City Council on Saturday [May 13], which led to no candidate being chosen in Ward 10 after officials were forced to shut down the event over safety concerns.

Somalian supporters of city council candidate Nasri Warsame turned to political violence and reportedly assaulted Minneapolis city council member Aisha Chughtai and her supporters when she took the stage to speak at the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party’s endorsing convention….

Video shows Warsame supporters forcefully jumping on stage, banging on tables, waving signs, and shouting over both Chughtai and her supporters.

Unable to contain the disruption, convention chairman Sam Doten was forced to adjourn the meeting without a candidate being chosen[,] citing safety reasons, and called the situation a great “embarrassment.”

The event was held at the Ella Baker Global Studies & Humanities Magnet School, a K-8 institution in the Uptown neighborhood.

Reporter Andy Ngo provided video (below) of the fracas and noted that in Somalia, “political violence is routine.”..........more.......

 since we don't have protection from trouble provided by the government, we have no choice left but being a vigilante;

In November of 2021 the political left was frothing at the mouth in anticipation of the verdict against a conservative 17-year-old named Kyle Rittenhouse, who had used a firearm in self defense against a mob of BLM supporters trying to kill him in Kenosha, Wisconsin. With the few shots Rittenhouse fired from his AR15 rifle, he managed to hit a convicted pedophile, a convicted domestic abuser, and a third assailant with a decade-long record of theft and violence. The first two died and the third survived; the rest of the mob ran away.

Statistically speaking, how was this even possible? Apparently you can’t spit in any direction at a BLM or Antifa protest without hitting a hardcore criminal, and it proves that leftist mobs are often made up of the worst kinds of people.  The kind of people attracted to riot environments because of the opportunities they provide to satiate criminal tendencies, all while those psychopaths pretend to to be fighting for a cause. Rittenhouse did the world a favor that day.

When Rittenhouse was acquitted on all charges, leftists were furious. The corporate media and even the White House had spent the better part of a year trying to demonize him as a “racist” (even though no one who got shot was a minority), and a “right wing extremist.” Even now, many on the political left still argue that Rittenhouse should be punished if only because his vindication in court might lead to even more acts of “right-wing vigilantism.”

My question is, what is wrong with vigilantism? Since the media is going to conflate self defense with vigilantes, lets really get to the root of the issue here – If a person or organization is belligerently opposed to self defense and good samaritans, I have to wonder if it’s because they have their own criminal intent?

When we’re talking about the moment a threat has been presented to innocent people, is it not incumbent upon bystanders to stop that threat if they are able? There are many critics out there with malicious intent that want to turn this into a purely legal issue, but I really don’t care about that. What I care about is the moral issue; is it moral to stop a dangerous person from threatening and harming others? Or, is it morally superior to simply sit back and do nothing until the “authorities” arrive?.......more.....

 this is funny and hypocritical at the same time. it seems that the empire is displeased that the chinese are doing the 'turn about is fair play' game;

DETROIT, May 27 (Reuters) - The United States "won't tolerate" China's effective ban on purchases of Micron Technology (MU.O) memory chips and is working closely with allies to address such "economic coercion," U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said on Saturday.

Raimondo told a news conference after a meeting of trade ministers in the U.S.-led Indo-Pacific Economic Framework talks that the U.S. "firmly opposes" China's actions against Micron.

These "target a single U.S. company without any basis in fact, and we see it as plain and simple economic coercion and we won't tolerate it, nor do we think it will be successful."

China's cyberspace regulator said on May 21 that Micron, the biggest U.S. memory chip maker, had failed its network security review and that it would block operators of key infrastructure from buying from the company, prompting it to predict a revenue reduction.

The move came a day after leaders of the G7 industrial democracies agreed to new initiatives to push back against economic coercion by China -- a decision noted by Raimondo..........more......

 the video rebel gives you dr david martin who knows a thing or two about covid. it ain't what your tv sold you;

David Martin gave a timeline of Covid’s origins and development in front of the European Parliament detailing the origins of Covid as a biological weapon when it was first noted in 1965 that the bat coronavirus was a model pathogen that could be easily modified.

From the video:

But in 1966, the very first CoV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation. And you heard the date 1966. I hope you’re getting the point of what I’m saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that’s been long in the making. A year before I was born, we had the first transatlantic coronavirus data-sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom.”

According to Martin, “Later we started learning how to modify a coronavirus by putting them in animals such as dogs and pigs,” and this led to the development of the first coronavirus spike protein vaccine by the US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer in 1990.

However, the medical community and pharmaceutical companies quickly learned that the vaccines were ineffective.

“Because the coronavirus is a malleable model, it mutates,” Martin said. “Every medical publication concluded that coronaviruses escape vaccines because it modifies and mutates too rapidly for a vaccine to be developed.”

From the Standard......more........

max igan stuffed with things to see and hear worthy of your awareness from beginning to end here for more than ninety minutes so you may wish to watch in bits;

watch.....