taylor sheridan has had enough, says he;
Wednesday, September 2, 2026
parts of europe want to go to war against russia, for no real reason, and the last sentence below is beyond stupid;
There was a reason why CTH focused on the Leipzig-Halle Airport “drone attack” in Germany on August 5th. {GO DEEP} There have been numerous indications the EU-NATO members, driven by Germany, France and the U.K. have been increasingly trying to expand the Ukraine war effort and pull in direct military engagement against Russia.
The Leipzig-Halle airport drone held all of the conspicuous indications of a false flag attack that did not stem from Russia. The quadcopter drone was a limited range battery powered small drone carrying a rudimentary IED type explosive. It needed to be operated and controlled by someone very close to the area, and the cargo area of the airport is a closed-loop security zone.
Nothing about the method, timing or location of the “drone attack” spoke to any value or importance for Russian interests in the Ukraine conflict. However, for expanding the war propaganda purposes the created narrative holds value. The Leipzig-Halle drone operation was more than likely carried out by the same country who bombed the Nordstream pipeline. That was Ukraine............more............
mark carney isn't a good thing for canada from all i've seen but here is some evidence you can use to make your own decision, conclusion;
Within 12 hours of the Friday announcement that Canada had walked away from trade discussions with the U.S, we were able to piece together what the four points were. Several people disagreed and claimed something else was involved. Today, Prime Minister Mark Carney affirmed specifically the accuracy of those four points.
While Prime Minister Carney used his verbose gaslighting to describe them, you can listen for yourself. It boiled down to four issues: [1] U.S. streaming services writing code for “search engines” in the French language (cultural issue). [2] The U.S. having a right to reject a trade deal made by Canada with a non-market economy, ie. CHINA. [3] Removal of tariffs on Canadian assembled heavy trucks, semi-trucks and industrial trucks (not in the auto sector). [4] Canada demanding 5% of gross revenues from U.S. tech platforms, with an attitude that U.S. controls North American trade.
You can listen to his own words describing these issues.............more............
larry johnson speaks about diesel;
I realize everyone is fixated on the renewal of US attacks on Iran. Iran has just completed its second wave of attacks on US military targets in Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan. I will write about this tomorrow. Today I want to focus on the true state of the diesel supply in the United States and the implications that holds with respect to the war with Iran. I am indebted to a reader — a gent named Bryan — and Karl Miller for the following analysis. I have condensed and summarized their arguments.
I have said on various podcasts that America has a diesel shortage. Distillate inventories are scraping levels not seen in decades, pump prices for diesel keep climbing, and the trucking, farming, and industrial sectors that run on middle distillates are feeling it. But a careful reader — i.e., Bryan –who worked through the Energy Information Administration’s own weekly data, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve transaction record, and the refiners’ second-quarter results came back with an uncomfortable question — and a veteran energy-market analyst — the talented Karl Miller — who reviewed the same picture pushed it further still. Between them they describe something more consequential than a shortage: an American refining system that is not starved of fuel so much as positioned astride a global scarcity, capturing its rent while the domestic consumer pays its price.
The numbers don’t describe a production failure
Start with what a genuine domestic shortage would look like: falling production, rising demand, and inventories drained to cover the gap. The data show almost the opposite............more............
its been a long time since we began to ask the 'jewish' question even though we've had some of the answers in this book;
Anyone who has looked into the Jewish Question, and even many who have not, likely have at least a passing awareness of the infamous document known as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion—or ‘Protocols’ for short. This small booklet, which first emerged in Russia around 1900, purports to lay out something of a plan for Jewish world domination.[1] Loosely organized into 24 short essays or individual protocols, this rambling, anonymous work portrays itself as a sort of ‘meeting minutes’ or ‘lecture notes’ from an evidently prominent and influential speaker, talking to a group of (presumably) Jews, explaining the means and mechanisms by which they will dominate individual nations and eventually the world via a master leader called “the Sovereign.”
As one might imagine, such a work has been roundly condemned as one of the most anti-Semitic publications of the 20th century. It has also—owing to its anonymity and fuzzy origins—been regularly denounced as a “forgery”; this assertion relies primarily on textual similarities to passages from an 1865 book by a Jewish writer, Maurice Joly, titled Dialogue in Hell. And because it is a forgery, we are told, the work as a whole is bogus and invalid, and therefore ought to be utterly disregarded.
But this, of course, is nonsense. Even if the writer lifted certain passages from Joly’s book as he was writing in (say) the late 1800s, that does not invalidate any truths in it; it simply reveals the author to be a bit of a plagiarist. The protocols could still be legitimate versions or encapsulations of some actual Jewish plan. But since we do not even know if the writer was a Jew (conveying in summary form an actual plan) or a non-Jew (attempting to make the Jews look bad), it is almost impossible to make clear and accurate determinations here...........more.........
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)