Sunday, August 3, 2025


white Nationalism;

The Controversial

Idea That Whites

Should Continue

To Exist

 caitlin askes a question;

As Israel and its supporters continue to lose control of the narrative around the world with more and more people awakening to the reality that a genocide is taking place in Gaza, I’m seeing the resurrection of a talking point that western Israel apologists have been trying to make work off and on since this mass atrocity began.

“What was Israel supposed to do in response to October 7?” they ask confidently, taking it as a given that there is no possible answer to this brilliant checkmate question besides “Rain vast quantities of military explosives on a giant concentration camp full of children and deliberately starve a civilian population using siege warfare.”

But the real problem is that they are asking the wrong question.......more..........


 speaking about massacres' in 1948 here are some israel's who were there;

watch...........

 things get hidden here in the empire;

see.........

watch...........

 cia? there are indications;

see............

 its like one of those wooden russian dolls that when you open each one there's another inside;


First things first. It might not be the popular thing to accept, but it is increasingly clear there is no way to get to any form of accountability or legal exposure for Russiagate or the manufacturing of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, anywhere near former President Barack Obama. The concentric circles of plausible deniability are just too extensive.

Essentially, despite the evidence of the FBI participating in a manufactured investigation predicted on false pretenses, all now supported with hindsight evidence, the fact that key IC officials, namely CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, presented the illusion of credible concern, inoculates President Obama from scrutiny.

As the Supreme Court noted, the President is protected from liability for “official acts” of his office. Yes, we all know these officials knew it was a ruse; however, in 2016 the CIA and FBI were presenting the information to Obama and saying the investigative value was potentially plausible. As such, Obama would have been within his official duty to tell the IC officials to chase down the information (continue investigating it).

Then, the January 5th, 2017, meeting documented by the infamous “by the book” Susan Rice memo, further inoculates President Obama for telling the IC officials to follow careful procedures as they continued investigating whether or not the Trump-Russia collusion was a factual concern. All of these elements lead to various tentacles of plausible deniability. No court is going to find criminal action within the decision-making, regardless of how ridiculous it may look in granular hindsight.

Are all the characters guilty of perpetrating a fraud for the expressed intent of a political narrative, yes. Are they criminally liable for it, extremely unlikely..........more.........

larry johnson begins with the variety of russian joo i'm familiar with having worked with some years ago; 


The latest issue of American Thinker just published a piece that puts moron in the term, oxymoron. The piece is titled, Perpetual Russian Wars, and is written by Jacob Fraden, who was born in Russia and arrived in the United States in 1977. I am taking a wild guess here, but I suspect that he is Jewish and that his parents left the Soviet Union as part of the Soviet Jewry Movement. The Soviet Jewry Movement emerged as a global campaign in support of Soviet Jews (“refuseniks”) who were denied the right to emigrate, facing both official restrictions and persecution. The movement gained international attention after high-profile events such as the 1970 Leningrad hijacking attempt, in which Soviet Jews tried to draw the world’s attention to their desires for emigration by attempting to commandeer a plane to escape to the West.

Why am I focusing on this guy? The lies in his article are breathtaking. I think he has a clear agenda… Promote a war to destroy Russia. He starts with this:

Here is an excerpt from a memorandum (1900) written by the Russian War Minister General Kuropatkin to Emperor Nicholas II:..........more........