just saw the parody and rushed to post it here. then discovered i lost the link and this tv news bit is the best intro i can find to wet the appetite of those who know how to search better than i. its an elon created, or at least published, kamala campaign ad. i'll keep looking and repost here if i succeed in finding it;
more about it here;
there are two links below from this michael yon newletter post i got in email subscrip and repost here for your consideration. as for the shooting, until some substantial timeline and such, like for jfk arrives for me to hang my hat on, i've seen too much evidence and some of it conflicting to the point i'm the mule between two stacks of hay, deliberating;
To be clear, I still see no clear, unambiguous evidence this was an assassination attempt. The red stuff on his ear may be blood. Or may not be blood.
And to be clear, no serious sniper or Trump would allow someone to shoot his ear. But a rifle in a vice could safely fire a bullet nearby (say 10 feet away) to create the desired acoustic signature.
Some people have told me Trump would never allow this. Why not? It’s already been established Trump is a superhero with indomitable courage.
We drive by giant trucks coming opposite direction on two-way roads on a normal basis. We eat foods from unknown origin in novel restaurants staffed by people we never see and servers whose names we do not know. We fly in airplanes maintained by unknown people with unknown parts and piloted by people we rarely meet. Doctors we never knew before operate with knives inside our bodies, and trusting-millions take deadly jabs of unknown provenance pushed by globalists.
It’s not hard to imagine a rifle in a vice and It’s easy to imagine the stage trick was not the assassination but in putting Trump into the untouchable status to imprison Americans with biometric IDs, and truly mandatory death jabs and social credit scores.
I do not know. But I do know all the evidence I have seen so far could go either way.
we once had a wide menu of independent media of all varieties. now we have a corporate media whose only focus seems to be support of the democratic onslaught;
The stunning events of the last several weeks have highlighted the great weaknesses in the corporate media, an essential part of modern America’s political system. They have, as they constantly remind us, a vital role to play. But they betrayed that role by their open partisanship.
For one brief shining moment, it seemed as if the media would live up to the promise of Adolph Ochs, the founder of the modern New York Times: “to give the news impartially, without fear or favor, regardless of party, sect, or interests involved.” In the month after President Biden’s disastrous debate performance, the media raised and vigorously pressed the questions about his fitness for office that had to be addressed for the good of the country.
Yet this spasm of critical curiosity about the fitness of our Democratic president turned out to be just an interlude. Everybody can remember that right before the debate the media (including the New York Times, which later called for Biden to leave the race) were saying that Biden was fine and questions about his decline were based on out-of-context video clips, labeled “cheap fakes” by the White House press office. But now that Biden has left the race, the media have reverted to their usual lack of interest in anything that sheds negative light on the national Democratic Party.
There is certainly no lack of material. In the wake of Biden’s withdrawal from campaigning, it would be no exaggeration to call this an administration mired in scandal. Besides the voter dissatisfaction over the failures of the last three and a half years, three new developments loom like shadows over the Biden-Harris White House..........more.........
caitlin has opinions that are mostly undeniable and here is more;
Saying a US politician is “bad on foreign policy but good on domestic policy” is like saying “Sure my husband spends his weekends murdering hitchhikers, but he’s a good provider and he knows how to fix a flat tire.”
Another annoying thing about US presidential elections is how all the liberals start babbling in unison about “foreign policy” and “domestic policy” like they’re two equal things which should be compartmentalized and separately considered.
“Okay sure, Kamala is bad on foreign policy with her support for what’s happening in Gaza and all, but she’s a lot better than Trump on domestic policy,” you’ll hear them say with increasing frequency and urgency.
Leaving aside the arguments one can make that Kamala Harris is actually quite bad on domestic policy, this separation of “foreign policy” and “domestic policy” is a dishonest talking point which only resonates with sloppy thinkers, and arises from a rather ugly underlying worldview.
Splitting up “foreign policy” and “domestic policy” on questions of right and wrong only makes sense if you believe harming foreigners is more morally acceptable than harming Americans. “Kamala is bad on foreign policy but good on domestic policy” just means “American lives are innately superior.” It can only feel true from the inside of an American supremacist worldview......more........
we live in a time where nothing is clear for too many reasons to list. the political scene is reminiscent of professional wrestling with each candidate shouting insults at the other in a manner which reminds me as in said wrestling games. anything has been happening that in years past no one would or could imagine with more on the way i'm sure;
As Jim Hoft reported over the weekend, X owner Elon Musk shared an epic parody video of Kamala Harris.
The AI-generated video, put together by the account @MrReaganUSA, highlights Harris’s strengths,” including her being the “ultimate diversity hire,” a “deep state puppet,” her word salads, her imitation of Barack Obama, and more.
Thanks to Musk, Mr. Reagan’s hilarious parody has racked up over 130 million views. Below is the video for those who have yet to see it...........more.....
