what is this fish you might ask;
https://dailytimewaster.blogspot.com/2024/07/early-20th-century-photo-of-huge.html
Saturday, July 13, 2024
martin armstrong has a computer program, able to predict some future events, i've heard cost him prison time cause he wouldn't give it to the feds and now he gives us this;
I cannot answer whether or not Joe Biden’s death will be the catalyst for the September 2024 panic cycle our computers have been forecasting for decades. The event in September will mark a global shift – perhaps and more likely a war. A few readers have written in to question whether this event could end up being the death of the Democratic nominee. After all, media outlets are in overdrive to push the Parkinson’s narrative, and one is led to believe that his condition is worsening by the day, given the sudden negative press. Even the most liberal of commentators are suddenly calling for Biden to step down, with new reports released each day detailing Biden’s declining mind.
The sympathy would certainly shift to the left in the event of the death of our nation’s president. Kamala Harris would take over for Joe Biden as the President of the United States. The Democrats do not want Kamala as their frontrunner or the face of the nation. Biden’s health is a valid concern given his current state.
According to law, the sitting president would need to pass before June of the next November election for states to postpone primaries and allow a new candidate to enter the race. However, if a candidate dies between now and the primaries, that candidate’s party could put forth a new presidential candidate. Yet, if the candidate is deemed unfit to run for office they could also shift their elect before the primaries. Could Biden replace his VP pick and then fall terminally ill? Absolutely. Kamala could be awarded a role such as Secretary of State or used as a scapegoat and they could replace her with someone like Hillary Clinton.
Joe Biden’s team is not willing to relinquish power just yet, but rest assured the Democrats want him out of the office before the election to prevent a Kamala presidency under the 25th Amendment, factoring in if the Democrats could even secure the election.
This happened in 1972 when George McGovern’s running mate, Senator Tom Eagleton, was forced to pull out of the race. Sargent Shriver was then selected by McGovern to replace Eagleton but had to receive the full support of the Democratic National Committee first. So, the party can bypass state, constitutional, and federal law to install their nominee. The Republicans and Democrats have different rules for doing so.
It is impossible to determine the catalyst event for specific Turning Points or dates that the computer cites. I’ve been proven wrong countless times when attempting to forecast based on my own personal opinion rather than the clear-cut method provided by the models. Could Joe Biden pass away near the September target? Perhaps.
Personally, I believe we are looking at something more along the lines of escalating warfare come September. The Democratic primaries ended on June 8 of this year. The Democrats have until August 19-22 to determine their formal nominee. Joe Biden won as a write-in candidate with no opposition. Joe Biden does not need to die for the Democrats to hand the nomination to another. The Biden camp is willing to admit he is unfit to run, still, that does not mean his party wouldn’t turn against him and force him to exit...........https://www.theburningplatform.com/2024/07/12/could-the-september-target-indicate-bidens-death/
the chinese are now in belarusian training and you might find this move curious at least, plus ray, larry and judge napolitano talk about current events;
The news media is treating this as some sort of antic that China recently cooked-up in order to send NATO a tough message. While that may be a consideration in the decision to do this exercise, the more important fact is that this exercise had been planned for at least one year. I refer you back to one of my earlier posts, Understanding Military Exercises.
Here is the U.S. propaganda channel, Radio Free Europe, take on the exercise:
As NATO leaders gathered in Washington for a landmark summit and issued “irreversible” support for Ukraine and deep criticism of Beijing for its support of Russia, China was holding maneuvers with Belarusian troops on the alliance’s eastern edge.
The 11-day joint military exercises named Eagle Assault 2024 kicked off on July 8 — the eve of the NATO summit — and are under way near the Belarusian city of Brest, some 5 kilometers from the Polish border.
The first of their kind between China and Belarus, the drills reflect growing defense ties between the two countries and are designed to send a message of resolve toward NATO, analysts and officials say.
The Chinese/Belarus exercise is taking place on the heels of a threatening declaration by NATO:
The 32-member NATO alliance on Wednesday harshly called out China for its role in propping up Russia’s war against Ukraine and declared that Ukraine was on an “irreversible” path to membership in the military alliance.
A summit declaration released at the alliance’s ongoing meetings in Washington includes language that for the first time names China as a “decisive enabler” of Russia’s war economy while also committing continued support for Ukraine to eventually obtain NATO membership.
Beijing has not provided weapons to Moscow, but it is sending dual-use equipment, microelectronics and other tools that Stoltenberg said enables Russia to “build the missiles, to build the bombs, to build the aircraft, to build the weapons they’re using to attack Ukraine.”................more.........
pcr says it all in the title he gave this essay, and preparing isn't the only move the empire has made;
Why Is the West Preparing for War?
Paul Craig Roberts
One result of the just concluded NATO Summit is Germany’s decision to host US intermediate-range missiles. Prior to 2019 when Washington cancelled the INF Treaty, the treaty prevented such deployment.
The INF Treaty was signed by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev on December 8,1987, and the treaty was ratified on June 1, 1988. The treaty was part and parcel of ending the cold war. Reagan called the treaty a “step toward a safer world.”
“The 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty required the United States and the Soviet Union to eliminate and permanently forswear all of their nuclear and conventional ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers. The treaty marked the first time the superpowers had agreed to reduce their nuclear arsenals, eliminate an entire category of nuclear weapons, and employ extensive on-site inspections for verification. As a result of the INF Treaty, the United States and the Soviet Union destroyed a total of 2,692 short-, medium-, and intermediate-range missiles by the treaty’s implementation deadline of June 1, 1991.”
Blaming Russia the Trump administration pulled out of the treaty. The consequence was to kill the nuclear disarmament that the INF Treaty began and to renew the arms race. If I had to bet I would say Washington’s withdrawal was a consequence of the US nuclear industry needing the source of profits that the arms race provided and the neoconservatives’ determination to revive US hegemony through the buildup of force. If Russia was truly out of compliance, Trump’s focus should have been to work to bring Russia into compliance, not terminate the treaty. The efforts of several American presidents and Soviet leaders in the 20th century to defuse tensions and to build trust were squandered by Washington in the 21st century........more.........
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)