fourteen minutes with officer tatum refuting charges of racism on the orange man with lots of evidence;
Wednesday, July 3, 2024
so does this incident lead you to be suspicious of 'legal' actions in california, or could it be reinforcement for your measure of the state's government activities;
There was an incident in California where a man was detained and cited for eating a sandwich while waiting for a train. The incident occurred at the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Pleasant Hill platform. The man, identified as Steve Foster, was confronted by a transit officer named D. McCormick. Foster’s video of the encounter went viral, drawing significant attention and prompting a protest............more..........
caitlin sees some concern about sloe joe's state of mind, and potential legal troubles for presidents, and then there's this pesky genocide we must ignore;
Guess they’ll have to release all those former US presidents who’ve been imprisoned for their war crimes and crimes against humanity now. Thanks a lot, Supreme Court.
Everyone’s acting shocked and outraged at the Supreme Court ruling that Donald Trump and other former presidents are largely immune from criminal prosecution, as though presidents getting prosecuted for their crimes is something that’s been happening this entire time.
It’s like oh wow you’re saying powerful people won’t have to abide by the same rules as normal people in America anymore?
Guess they’ll have to release all those former US presidents who’ve been imprisoned for their war crimes and crimes against humanity now. Thanks a lot, Supreme Court.
❖
Those obvious dementia symptoms are not dementia symptoms.
That obvious genocide is not genocide.
Those obvious war crimes are not war crimes.
Those obvious NATO provocations are not provocations.
This obvious dystopia is not a dystopia.
This obvious propaganda is not propaganda.
❖
It’s hilarious how the liberal commentariat is freaking out not because their president is a dementia patient but because they’re not sure if a dementia patient can win an election............more.........
it seems that some of our political members have an issue with the first amendment which says you shall make no law interfering with free speech, period;
Anyone paying attention already knows that the left thinks the First Amendment goes too far. And by going too far, they mean letting conservatives share their opinions and hamstringing the government’s ability to crack down on speech they don’t like.
And they have no problem, or shame sharing, this publicly for all the world to see.
Tim Wu, a Columbia law professor who served on the National Economic Council during both the Obama and Biden administrations, wrote an op-ed for The New York Times literally titled “The First Amendment is Out of Control.”
His piece argues that American judges have twisted the First Amendment into “an all-purpose tool of legislative nullification that now mostly protects corporate interests.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He writes, “Monday’s Supreme Court decision in the two NetChoice cases” have added to complications with the First Amendment by viewing social media company algorithms as equivalent to “expressive decisions made by human editors at newspapers.”
To leftists like Wu, the First Amendment has outlived its usefulness and purpose because it can’t silence speech he doesn’t like. He sees 1A as a “barrier” to government action and overreach.
Isn’t that a good thing?
InfoWars reports:...........more........
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)