those in charge aren't acting for those they rule and the results of their games are only making our lives worse;

During the early onset of covid-19 in the spring, government officials across the political spectrum widely agreed that government intervention and forced closure of many businesses was necessary to protect public health. This approach has clearly failed in the United States as it led to widespread economic devastation, including millions of jobs lost, bankruptcies, and extremely severe losses in profitability. Nor have states with strict lockdowns succeeded in bringing about fewer covid deaths per million than states that were less strict.Consequently, a few months into the pandemic, some governors weighed the competing economic costs with covid-19 containment and slowly reopened their economies. Of course, these governors did not mandate businesses reopen; however, they provided businesses the option to reopen.

Hysteria ensued as many viewed easing restrictions as akin to mass murder. The Atlantic famously dubbed Georgia governor Brian Kemp’s easing of restrictions as “human sacrifice” and referred to Georgians as being in a “case study in pandemic exceptionalism.” Instead, we should view the lockdowns as a case study in the failure of heavy-handed approaches in containing a highly infectious virus.

Now that we are nine months into this pandemic, there is a clearer picture of how state government approaches varied widely. It is clear that “reopened” economies are faring much better overall than less “reopened” economies. “Fueled by broader, faster economic reopenings following the initial coronavirus rash, conservative-leaning red states are by and large far outpacing liberal-leaning blue states in terms of putting people back to work,” writes Carrie Sheffield. This follows logically especially when considering that human beings learn to adapt very quickly. Now, we have learned much more about treating this virus and about who is most at risk from infection.......read more......

 it seems that pennsylvania has a problem with accurate and honest elections;

As Trump's solid lead on election night in Pennsylvania leaked away overnight (in mysterious and allegedly nefarious ways), many were left wondering just what happened. Well, there was no fraud, that's for sure, according to the establishment leftists and rightists and the media... it's all a vast right wing conspiracy.

Headline-writers and talking-heads were quick to dismiss any allegations, 100s of affadavits, and video evidence of fraud, proclaiming any and all suggestions of fraud are "baseless claims" and an "unprecedented" attack on Democracy... etc...

However, this kind of systemic fraud is anything but unprecedented in Pennsylvania. As none other than The New York Times wrote in February 1994...

"Saying Philadelphia's election system had collapsed under "a massive scheme" by Democrats to steal a State Senate election in November, a Federal judge today took the rare step of invalidating the vote and ordered the seat filled by the Republican candidate."

Judge Newcomer ruled that the Democratic campaign of William G. Stinson had stolen the election from Bruce S. Marks in North Philadelphia's Second Senatorial District through an elaborate fraud in which hundreds of residents were encouraged to vote by absentee ballot even though they had no legal reason -- like a physical disability or a scheduled trip outside the city -- to do so... (emphasis ours)

In many instances, according to Republicans who testified during a four-day civil trial last week, Democratic campaign workers forged absentee ballots. On many of the ballots, they used the names of people who were living in Puerto Rico or serving time in prison, and in one case, the voter had been dead for some time.

"Substantial evidence was presented establishing massive absentee ballot fraud, deception, intimidation, harassment and forgery," Judge Newcomer wrote in a decision made public today.

The district, which includes white, black and Hispanic neighborhoods, is overwhelmingly Democratic by registration. Nonetheless, campaign workers testified that widespread voter apathy had prompted them to promote a "new way to vote" to insure a victory...........read more.......

 what little faith i had remaining in the 'electoral' process vanished in the two bush the second 'elections' and the game around the orange man became obvious as the day went on for this latest 'election' but here below is some thing approaching evidence;

Regardless of where one falls politically, the sanctity of the vote is a bedrock of a functioning representative democracy. Voters have to believe their vote matters. And that the vote is free, fair, and accurate.

Below we explore the details and the data of what happened in Pennsylvania, nicknamed “The Keystone State“, on Election Day. Elsewhere we explore similar efforts in the key swing states of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia.

Mail-In Ballots in Pennsylvania

Voter turnout was up everywhere. This was expected due to the highly partisan and hotly contested nature of the election. However, there is something worth taking a closer look at in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania — namely the incredibly lopsided impact that mail-in ballots had on the election.

We’re not sure how many mail-in ballots went for Biden in Wisconsin because the data has not been released. However, despite what we were told about how Biden would dominate in mail-in ballots, Pennsylvania is the only place of which we’re aware that this was actually true. Biden tended to be up single digits where he was ahead through mail-in ballots......read more.......

 it seems that the orange man may be on to something in his claims as you can learn more about in this post;

Trey Trainor, the Chairman of the Federal Election, stated during an appearance on Newsmax this Thursday that he “does believe there’s voter fraud taking place,” and confirmed that the refusal to allow poll watchers to observe the ballot counting process – among numerous other irregularities – does indeed constitute an “illegitimate election.”

“I do believe that there is voter fraud taking place in these places,” Trainor said. “Otherwise they would allow the observers to go in.”

“When you have claims of 10,000 people who don’t live in the state of Nevada having voted in Nevada, when you have the video showing where people are either duplicating a spoiled ballot right there, or they’re in the process of just marking a ballot that came in blank for a voter, that’s a process that needs to be observed by election observers,” Trainor said.

The FEC Chairman added that poll observers are legally allowed to be present during the counting of ballots, and if they are refused entry to a place where the vote is being tabulated then “the law is not being followed, making this an illegitimate election.”......read and watch more....

 no matter who you vote for the government still gets in and here caitlin provides some evidence to show you how that's really so;

The US government simply is not what Americans were taught it is in school, and it is not what they tell you it is in the news. It’s a mostly unelected power establishment which operates in the interests of imperialist expansionism and oligarchic control, with the official elected government operating sort of like the unplugged video game controller you hand your kid brother to keep him from whining for a chance to play.All this fuss over who really won the election is missing the point. People are bickering over which oligarchic puppet should be sworn in on January 20th when all the evidence we’ve been given shows that nobody gets to become president if they inconvenience real power in any way, and if they do inconvenience real power they are simply ignored.

That is the direction we should all be looking. Not at who’s president, but why things stay the same no matter who’s president..........read and watch more.....

 raised as a birthright quaker i've always been on the side of the oppressed, but in recent years i've come to question some of the classifications of oppression, and this essay presents some of those questions. You must not ask why blacks don’t succeed;

We like to think that only primitive people have taboos. New Guineans, Andaman Islanders. But us Americans? We’re too liberated for that.

Well we have taboos, alright, and they cause more damage and misery than any of the weird stuff the Asaro Mud Men or initiates in the Cult of the Crocodile believe. One of our fiercest taboos is the absolute prohibition against asking why blacks don’t do as well as whites. There’s only one official, obligatory answer: racism. If blacks don’t do as well at something — income, crime rates, test scores, school grades, school discipline, the Oscars, Covid cases, jobs in orchestras – you name it: If they don’t do as well as whites, it’s our fault. White people have created a deeply racist system.

This taboo will be enforced even more fiercely with Joe Biden in the White House. He promised to “root out systemic racism,” which he says is everywhere. That means remaking every aspect of American society to favor blacks because, as Kamala Harris explained in a campaign video, “equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place.” “We,” meaning blacks and whites.

If you ever wondered if different races might have different natural abilities, or might even be genetically different, you’re a hopeless bigot. Barely human. But there is a milder form of taboo-breaking. Maybe blacks and whites don’t end up in the same place, as Kamala says, because blacks and whites don’t always act the same way. Could it be that what blacks do or don’t do makes a difference? Is it possible that black students are suspended more often because they misbehave more often, for example?

No. That would occur only to bad people. The problem is racism. It’s not up to blacks to do anything differently. As Ebony McGee, a professor at Vanderbilt University, explains to white people: “You got us into this mess — why is it our job to get us out?” ........read and watch more......

 we're sold many fictions by 'our free press' and here you can discover some i'm sure you never imagined. the holocaust should really be called the holohoax because much of what you're told isn't so, and here is some evidence;

Last month, Townhall.com columnist Marina Medvin published a column about letters allegedly written by Leon Morin, a 29-year old soldier who helped liberate the Dachau concentration camp in 1945. In his letters, Morin made a number of eyebrow-raising claims about Dachau—claims that Medvin swallowed uncritically:

• The camp contained a gas chamber disguised as a shower room.
• The gas chamber exterminated inmates using chlorine gas.
• There were at least 20 camps just like Dachau on German soil.

Today, no historian—mainstream or revisionist, Jewish or gentile—would agree with these claims. According to the official Dachau website, “Killing people on a mass scale through poison gas never took place in the Dachau concentration camp.” According to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, the Germans operated only five extermination camps: Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor, Treblinka, and Auschwitz-Birkenau. All were located in Poland, not Germany. Neither mainstream historians nor revisionists believe that chlorine gassings occurred at any of the camps.

In his letter, Morin claimed that Dachau’s prison guards gassed thousands of inmates in a three-hour period just before U.S. troops arrived, of which “more than half” were “half cremated.” The point, we are led to believe, was to kill as many Jews as possible immediately before the camp was liberated and to conceal the dead bodies from the U.S. soldiers. If the point was to conceal evidence of gassings, we are left to wonder why the Germans would go to the trouble of half cremating bodies rather than fully cremating them. It is also curious that the guards waited until the very last minute to administer these alleged executions when there would have been ample opportunity to do so earlier.........read and watch more......