ten minutes of tucker carlson making great points about what must be done;
https://youtu.be/NS-bsetu01w
i began this blogspot to save sending emails to all i suspected might need or want to review: avoid being a spammer. so consider these things i thought you might find interest in. if you like what you see, pass it on. If the power elites didn’t need the consent of the public to rule, they wouldn’t have to lie constantly about their reasons for their wars on everyone. as gore vidal said: i'm not a conspiracy theorist, i'm a conspiracy observer.
Thursday, July 2, 2020
if you be one of those who believe the state will protect you i suggest you read the following article which will show you that you're wrong;
Greenwood Village, CO – By refusing to hear a tragic case in which police officers in Greenwood Village, Colorado, destroyed a private residence while pursuing a suspected shoplifter the Supreme Court has seemingly granted police new powers for which they will not be held accountable. They can now apparently completely destroy your home and they will not have to pay for it. That’s what happened to Leo Lech’s home in 2015 after a shoplifter — accused of stealing a shirt — illegally entered his home, forcing Greenwood Village SWAT to go room by room ransacking the place with explosives.
Last year, as TFTP reported, a federal court refused to grant the homeowners any compensation. This was in spite of the fact that the family had no connection to the theft, never allowed the thief in their home, and broke no law prior to police destroying their home. After receiving this news in October, the family held out hope for their chances in the Supreme Court.
This week, however, all those chances turned to ash as the land’s highest court refused to even hear their case.
As Reason points out, this is despite the fact that the Takings Clause of the 5th Amendment is supposed to protect citizens from having their property taken or destroyed by the government without being justly compensated for that loss.
So much for that pesky piece of paper called the Constitution….......read more............
twenty cops to arrest one man for having some weed;
https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/hjez5q/man_getting_arrested_by_twenty_police_officers/
https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/hjez5q/man_getting_arrested_by_twenty_police_officers/
seven minutes with tucker carlson speaking with the st louis couple who felt threatened by a mob;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiIZTVuSUiY&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiIZTVuSUiY&feature=youtu.be
eleven minutes of lisa haven with statistics on the beer flu;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZAlmwS4d_A&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZAlmwS4d_A&feature=youtu.be
Wednesday, July 1, 2020
caitlin presents evidence that the empire is built upon lies and being the biggest bully;
On a December 2010 episode of Fox News’ Freedom Watch, John Bolton and the show’s host Andrew Napolitano were debating about recent WikiLeaks publications, and naturally the subject of government secrecy came up.
“Now I want to make the case for secrecy in government when it comes to the conduct of national security affairs, and possibly for deception where that’s appropriate,” Bolton said. “You know Winston Churchill said during World War Two that in wartime truth is so important it should be surrounded by a bodyguard of lies.”
“Do you really believe that?” asked an incredulous Napolitano.
“Absolutely,” Bolton replied.
“You would lie in order to preserve the truth?” asked Napolitano.
“If I had to say something I knew was false to protect American national security, I would do it,” Bolton answered.
“Why do people in the government think that the laws of society or the rules don’t apply to them?” Napolitano asked.
“Because they are not dealing in the civil society we live in under the Constitution,” Bolton replied. “They are dealing in the anarchic environment internationally where different rules apply.”
“But you took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and the Constitution mandates certain openness and certain fairness,” Napolitano protested. “You’re willing to do away with that in order to attain a temporary military goal?”............read and watch more........
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)