Friday, September 20, 2019

beto wants to take your 'assault' weapons and was answered by another politician;


Last week, a political party of violence peddling Bolsheviks held a debate involving candidates who wish to be anointed the next American Emperor. One candidate by the name of Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke (known to Real Texans and Real Mexicans as The Fake Mexican) adamantly announced his intentions to confiscate the firearms of peaceful American subjects.
“Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47,” the former El Paso congressman said. “We’re not going to allow it to be used against our fellow Americans anymore.”
Not surprisingly, this assertion brought a rousing response from those who would object to such a criminal action. One of those objecting was Texas State Rep. Briscoe Cain. His response was equally inflammatory:
“My AR is ready for you, Robert Francis.”
Being the typical, loud mouthed, bullying coward, O’Rourke took Mr. Cain’s blunt eloquence as a “death threat.” He was so offended, he even reported Mr. Cain to the DC Regime’s version of the Gestapo.
But just who is issuing “threats” in this exchange?
This fact must be made perfectly clear: “Beto” is the one doing the threatening here; threatening to confiscate a peaceful individual’s property, threatening to take away a peaceful individual’s tool of self-defense and threatening lethal violence against peaceful individuals, if necessary, to accomplish just that.
Remember O’Rourke’s use of the well-worn, collectivist “we” in his confiscation announcement? It does not mean “he” personally, as Emperor, will be politely knocking on your door. It will be a cadre of heavily armed, loyalist goons doing his dirty work.
Mr. Cain is obviously aware of this fact, making his measured response completely rational.............http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/09.19/ready.html
i don't always agree with pat buchanan but when i do..........


President Donald Trump does not want war with Iran. America does not want war with Iran. Even the Senate Republicans are advising against military action in response to that attack on Saudi Arabia’s oil facilities.
“All of us (should) get together and exchange ideas, respectfully, and come to a consensus — and that should be bipartisan,” says Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch of Idaho.
When Lindsey Graham said the White House had shown “weakness” and urged retaliatory strikes for what Secretary of State Mike Pompeo calls Iran’s “act of war,” the president backhanded his golfing buddy:
“It’s very easy to attack, but if you ask Lindsey … ask him how did going into the Middle East … work out. And how did Iraq work out?”
Still, if neither America nor Iran wants war, what has brought us to the brink?Our course was fixed by the policy we chose to pursue.
Imposing on Iran the most severe sanctions ever by one modern nation on another, short of war, the U.S., through “maximum pressure,” sought to break the Iranian regime and bend it to America’s will.
Answer: The policy imposed by Trump, Pompeo and John Bolton after our unilateral withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal...........https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/09/patrick-j-buchanan/can-trump-still-avoid-war-on-iran/
this post is an email from a friend i believe contains a lot of realism you won't hear from 'our free press';

My humble opinion;

Unfortunately, the typical American mind has been trained to associate "socialism" with "communism", and this was easily done after we all saw how well the United Soviet Socialist Republic did in comparison to the USA, the "greatest country on Earth". We were trained to think that our "capitalistic" ways were so superior, and they were when compared to the USSR which we then saw crumble and succumb to capitalism. Few ever realized that both capitalism and socialist communism were both experiments that the jooish oligarchs designed and deployed on separate continents to see which one served them better. When they made their decision, the iron curtain disappeared. This effectively closed the case for "socialism" as far as the average American was concerned, and few have challenged themselves to think otherwise. Yet they are proud to live in the only country that does not look after the health of its slaves, I mean people, without those people paying through the nose for it. They are proud to "serve" in its military and never realize that it is the ziojoos that they serve. Mention socialism around these people and watch the look of disgust appear on their face as they ostracize you for uttering the word. So well trained they are. 

My dad lives in a socialist country, Germany. Munich to be exact. He loves it there as do Germans themselves. Few in any in the European countries are jealous of Americans. In fact most think we Americans are deluded, and they are right. My dad is now in his early nineties and is nearly blind. His lapel pin identifies him as such and polite Germans offer him help wherever he goes. He pays nothing for public transportation or medical costs. In fact, no Europeans directly pay for medical costs (how it is paid for is an entirely different and lengthy discussion). Having been there myself I can tell you that everything there just works and people there are very happy and generally well off. 

Whether socialism is good or bad depends entirely on how it is implemented. The same could be possible for communism but we really don't have any positive examples to point to so for the time being we must consider it detrimental to the human experience. Socialistic nations do not all manage their socialism equally. While Germany may be among the top performers, nations like South Korea aren't doing quite so well. Adding to the list of things typical Americans are oblivious to is the fact that the USA is itself, a blend of socialism and capitalism, just like our European neighbors, except it is not managed nearly as well here as it is there. It is the socialistic mismanagement that seems to get "democrats" in hot water more than most everything else. 

You could try to pin a different name on socialism but Americans who identify as "republican conservatives" will be quick to see it and scream bloody socialism. So effective is the training from the ziojoos. If renaming is to be successful and republican conservatives are to ever look upon any form of socialism favorably, they will need to be taught this by their trusted ziojoo sources, ie. government, public schools and MSM. These boneheads don't even know that "NAZI" was a derogatory slur on the German National Socialists that was coined by joos.

So, ziojoos now control north and central America, Europe, Russia, Australia, most of south America, some of Africa and at least have some effect on the rest of the nations. How is it that this relatively small group of people have managed to take control over such a large chunk of human activity? We must not underestimate the intelligence of these monstrous people if we are to prevail.

Thursday, September 19, 2019

the onion unknowingly gets it real;

Four months ago the satirical news site The Onion posted the headline, “John Bolton: ‘An Attack On Two Saudi Oil Tankers Is An Attack On All Americans’”.
I remember the post because it cracked me up a the time. Like many Onion headlines, the joke came from a cartoonish exaggeration of something that we all kind of know to be basically true but which no official would actually say, in this case the fact that the drivers of the US war machine are always trying to spin their imperialist resource control agendas as something which protects ordinary Americans instead of plutocratic investments and geostrategic hegemony. It was quite clever, and it was very clearly satirical.
can't be any clearer;


no matter who did it the drone attack on the saudi oil facilities vastly changes the state of military activities for the future;


The Yemeni Shiite group’s spectacular attack on Abqaiq raises the distinct possibility of a push to drive the House of Saud from power

Blowback is a bitch. Houthis – Zaidi Shiites from northern Yemen – and Wahhabis have been at each other’s throats for ages. This book is absolutely essential to understand the mind-boggling complexity of Houthi tribes; as a bonus, it places the turmoil in southern Arabian lands way beyond a mere Iran-Saudi proxy war.We are the Houthis and we’re coming to town. With the spectacular attack on Abqaiq, Yemen’s Houthis have overturned the geopolitical chessboard in Southwest Asia – going as far as introducing a whole new dimension: the distinct possibility of investing in a push to drive the House of Saud out of power.
Still, it’s always important to consider that Arab Shiites in the Eastern province – working in Saudi oil installations – have got to be natural allies of the Houthis fighting against Riyadh.
Houthi striking capability – from drone swarms to ballistic missile attacks – has been improving remarkably for the past year or so. It’s not by accident that the UAE saw which way the geopolitical and geoeconomic winds were blowing: Abu Dhabi withdrew from Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman’s vicious war against Yemen and now is engaged in what it describes as a  “peace-first” strategy.
Even before Abqaiq, the Houthis had already engineered quite a few attacks against Saudi oil installations as well as Dubai and Abu Dhabi airports. In early July, Yemen’s Operations Command Center staged an exhibition in full regalia in Sana’a featuring their whole range of ballistic and winged missiles and drones............http://thesaker.is/how-the-houthis-overturned-the-chessboard/

Why on Earth Would the US Go to War with Iran over an Attack on Saudi Oil Refineries?" (Lindorff).  Lots of questions like this that we're not supposed to even think about.  Like, why would the US spend trillions of dollars of wealth and basically wreck itself as a country all so 2% of its population can have an arguably slightly better chance of killing people and stealing their land?  These questions are why we need to realize that American politics is run through the blackmail of American politicians by Jewish gangsters.............https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/09/18/why-on-earth-would-the-us-go-to-war-with-iran-over-an-attack-on-saudi-oil-refineries/