i began this blogspot to save sending emails to all i suspected might need or want to review: avoid being a spammer. so consider these things i thought you might find interest in. if you like what you see, pass it on. If the power elites didn’t need the consent of the public to rule, they wouldn’t have to lie constantly about their reasons for their wars on everyone. as gore vidal said: i'm not a conspiracy theorist, i'm a conspiracy observer.
Wednesday, July 3, 2019
a good question is asked here and several videos are provided in the process of answering it;
Throughout my entire life I have heard American politicians in both major political parties and an array of media pundits tell me that Israel is our greatest ally and friend in the Middle East. The thing is, these people never explain why Israel is considered such a great ally and friend. They just ramble on about how Israel is a democracy and expect people to believe that this is somehow a sufficient explanation.
But this is obviously not a sufficient explanation. Just because another country has a particular type of government does not make them an ally or a friend.........https://russia-insider.com/en/how-exactly-israel-americas-greatest-ally-and-friend-middle-east/ri27371
Throughout my entire life I have heard American politicians in both major political parties and an array of media pundits tell me that Israel is our greatest ally and friend in the Middle East. The thing is, these people never explain why Israel is considered such a great ally and friend. They just ramble on about how Israel is a democracy and expect people to believe that this is somehow a sufficient explanation.
But this is obviously not a sufficient explanation. Just because another country has a particular type of government does not make them an ally or a friend.........https://russia-insider.com/en/how-exactly-israel-americas-greatest-ally-and-friend-middle-east/ri27371
the 'authorities' will do this more every day in complete violation of all legal restraints;
Oh, and make note of the reply. “Because we can.” Not a single one of these officers cared about their oath to uphold the constitution. They may not be judged on this in time, but they certainly will in eternity...........http://www.captainsjournal.com/2019/07/02/mass-unlawful-detention-by-indiana-police/
The Free Thought Project has reported on multiple instances in which entire groups of people were detained and forced to show ID or submit to a search. However, during these questionable situations, police were able to reasonably articulate suspicion that a crime had been committed or was about to be committed. Over the weekend, at a popular Michigan City bar, there was no crime and no one had been suspected of committing a crime.The Supreme Court rule on “Terry Stops” means nothing according to the police. They are a law unto themselves.
Despite these facts, more than a dozen officers raided this peaceful establishment in which patrons were enjoying their Saturday night. Police officers with the Michigan City Police Department blocked all the exits and the rights violating process began.
After police trapped them inside, every person in the bar was forced to line up and submit their identification to one of the many police officers who had setup laptops. Only after they submitted to the background checks were the patrons allowed to leave.
In the state of Indiana, a person only has to show their identification to law enforcement only if they have been stopped for an infraction or ordinance violation. Obviously, every single person inside this bar was not suspected of a crime, which made this process unconstitutional.
However, as the video shows, police didn’t accuse anyone of committing an infraction and detained them anyway.
What’s more, according to our sources at the bar that night, not a single arrest was even made.
As the video shows, the police officers running everyone’s IDs, couldn’t have cared about due process. Indeed, when Manna Carter, the woman who took the video, asks one of the officers why they are doing this, his response was, “because we can.”
As Carter questions them, the police attempted to justify this raid by claiming to be a part of some excise enforcement operation for the Alcohol & Tobacco Commission. However, the state of Indiana has an its own department for this known as the Indiana State Excise Police (ISEP).
More over, this was not some attempt to catch underage drinkers or a bar selling unlicensed booze. This was a sweeping raid and subsequent mass detainment of dozens of innocent people who were all forced to submit their information to police — probable cause be damned.
Even more damning is the fact that in an interview with TFTP, Carter said that no police officers from the ISEP were there that night and all the officers involved were from MCPD.
TFTP also reached out to the ISEP and the MCPD to inquire about which statute gave them the authority to carry out such rights-stomping exercise, however our calls and emails have yet to be returned.
Oh, and make note of the reply. “Because we can.” Not a single one of these officers cared about their oath to uphold the constitution. They may not be judged on this in time, but they certainly will in eternity...........http://www.captainsjournal.com/2019/07/02/mass-unlawful-detention-by-indiana-police/
here's the picture which is followed by much evidence about the holohoax;

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/07/03/holocaust-truth-did-six-million-really-die-by-ernst-zundel-joseph-g-burg/

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/07/03/holocaust-truth-did-six-million-really-die-by-ernst-zundel-joseph-g-burg/
the title says it all and the rest is evidence;
We’re Not the Good Guys
Why Is American Aggression Missing in Action?
By Tom Engelhardt
Headlined “U.S. Seeks Other Ways to Stop Iran Shy of War,” the article was tucked away on page A9 of a recent New York Times. Still, it caught my attention. Here's the first paragraph:
I mean, forget the history of the second half of the last century and all of this one so far. Forget that back in the Neolithic age of the 1980s, before Iraqi autocrat Saddam Hussein turned out to be the new Adolf Hitler and needed to be taken down by us (no aggression there), the administration of President Ronald Reagan actively backed his unprovoked invasion of, and war against, Iran. (That included his use of chemical weapons against Iranian troop concentrations that American military intelligence helped him target.) Forget that, in 2003, the administration of George W. Bush launched an unprovoked war of aggression against Iraq, based on false intelligence about Saddam’s supposed weapons of mass destruction and his supposed links to al-Qaeda. Forget that the Trump administration tore up a nuclear agreement with Iran to which that country was adhering and which would indeed have effectively prevented it from producing nuclear weapons for the foreseeable future. Forget that its supreme leader (in fatwas he issued) prohibited the creation or stockpiling of such weaponry in any case.
Forget that the Trump administration, in a completely unprovoked manner, imposed crippling sanctions on that country and its oil trade, causing genuine suffering, in hopes of toppling that regime economically as Saddam Hussein’s had been toppled militarily in neighboring Iraq in 2003, all in the name of preventing the atomic weapons that the Obama-negotiated pact had taken care of. Forget the fact that an American president, who, at the last moment, halted air strikes against Iranian missile bases (after one of their missiles shot down that American drone) is now promising that an attack on "anything American will be met with great and overwhelming force... In some areas, overwhelming will mean obliteration.”
Provocations? Aggression? Perish the thought!...........http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/176582/tomgram%3A_engelhardt%2C_war_with.../#more
We’re Not the Good Guys
Why Is American Aggression Missing in Action?
By Tom Engelhardt
Headlined “U.S. Seeks Other Ways to Stop Iran Shy of War,” the article was tucked away on page A9 of a recent New York Times. Still, it caught my attention. Here's the first paragraph:
“American intelligence and military officers are working on additional clandestine plans to counter Iranian aggression in the Persian Gulf, pushed by the White House to develop new options that could help deter Tehran without escalating tensions into a full-out conventional war, according to current and former officials.”Note that “Iranian aggression.” The rest of the piece, fairly typical of the tone of American media coverage of the ongoing Iran crisis, included sentences like this: “The C.I.A. has longstanding secret plans for responding to Iranian provocations.” I’m sure I’ve read such things hundreds of times without ever really stopping to think much about them, but this time I did. And what struck me was this: rare is the moment in such mainstream news reports when Americans are the “provocative” ones (though the Iranians immediately accused the U.S. military of just that, a provocation, when it came to the U.S. drone its Revolutionary Guard recently shot down either over Iranian air space or the Strait of Hormuz). When it comes to Washington’s never-ending war on terror, I think I can say with reasonable confidence that, in the past, the present, and the future, the one phrase you’re not likely to find in such media coverage will be “American aggression.”
I mean, forget the history of the second half of the last century and all of this one so far. Forget that back in the Neolithic age of the 1980s, before Iraqi autocrat Saddam Hussein turned out to be the new Adolf Hitler and needed to be taken down by us (no aggression there), the administration of President Ronald Reagan actively backed his unprovoked invasion of, and war against, Iran. (That included his use of chemical weapons against Iranian troop concentrations that American military intelligence helped him target.) Forget that, in 2003, the administration of George W. Bush launched an unprovoked war of aggression against Iraq, based on false intelligence about Saddam’s supposed weapons of mass destruction and his supposed links to al-Qaeda. Forget that the Trump administration tore up a nuclear agreement with Iran to which that country was adhering and which would indeed have effectively prevented it from producing nuclear weapons for the foreseeable future. Forget that its supreme leader (in fatwas he issued) prohibited the creation or stockpiling of such weaponry in any case.
Forget that the Trump administration, in a completely unprovoked manner, imposed crippling sanctions on that country and its oil trade, causing genuine suffering, in hopes of toppling that regime economically as Saddam Hussein’s had been toppled militarily in neighboring Iraq in 2003, all in the name of preventing the atomic weapons that the Obama-negotiated pact had taken care of. Forget the fact that an American president, who, at the last moment, halted air strikes against Iranian missile bases (after one of their missiles shot down that American drone) is now promising that an attack on "anything American will be met with great and overwhelming force... In some areas, overwhelming will mean obliteration.”
Provocations? Aggression? Perish the thought!...........http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/176582/tomgram%3A_engelhardt%2C_war_with.../#more
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)