Thursday, December 13, 2018

here is an interesting take on what china might do in regards to canada kidnapping one of their prominent corporate officers for the empire and i suspect it would be much fun if china followed this advice;


As most readers know, I’m not a casual political blogger and I prefer producing lengthy research articles rather than chasing the headlines of current events. But there are exceptions to every rule, and the looming danger of a direct worldwide clash with China is one of them.
Consider the arrest last week of Meng Wanzhou, the CFO of Huawei, the world’s largest telecom equipment manufacturer. While flying from Hong Kong to Mexico, Ms. Meng was changing planes in the Vancouver International Airport airport when she was suddenly detained by the Canadian government on an August US warrant. Although now released on $10 million bail, she still faces extradition to a New York City courtroom, where she could receive up to thirty years in federal prison for allegedly having conspired in 2010 to violate America’s unilateral economic trade sanctions against Iran.
Although our mainstream media outlets have certainly covered this important story, including front page articles in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, I doubt most American readers fully recognize the extraordinary gravity of this international incident and its potential for altering the course of world history. As one scholar noted, no event since America’s deliberate 1999 bombing of China’s embassy in Belgrade, which killed several Chinese diplomats, has so outraged both the Chinese government and its population. Columbia’s Jeffrey Sachs correctly described it as “almost a US declaration of war on China’s business community.”.............http://www.unz.com/runz/averting-world-conflict-with-china/
i ain't got no quarrel with them russians is the title of this and it clearly makes that point with much detail;

The entire anti-Russia brouhaha has reminded me of what Mohammad Ali stated after receiving notice from his local draft board that he was being forced to serve in the U.S. military during the Vietnam War. Ali declared. “I ain’t got no quarrel with them Vietcong.”
Ali had a point. After all, what had the Vietcong done to him or any other American? No Vietcong had ever come to the United States and attacked civilians, soldiers, or CIA or NSA agents. No Viet Cong had ever expressed any interest in invading and conquering the United States and taking over the federal government and the nation’s public-school systems. All that they were doing was trying to win a civil war that would put the entire country under the rule of Ho Chi Minh, a declared communist.
What did that have to do with Mohamad Ali or any other American? Oh, sure, the Viet Cong were killing U.S. soldiers but those soldiers were over there. Operating on orders of the Pentagon, they had invaded a foreign land thousands of miles away from the United States. They had embroiled themselves in another nation’s civil war. They were killing people over there. If they hadn’t invaded, no Vietcong would have come to get us despite the Pentagon’s and CIA’s Cold War claim of a worldwide communist conspiracy that was supposedly based in Moscow, Russia, whose aim was supposedly to start knocking down countries like dominoes until they finally got the Big Domino, which was the United States.
Moreover, the U.S. government never enacted any law making the Viet Cong an official enemy of the United States. And the U.S. Congress never declared war on the Viet Cong or North Vietnam, which the Constitution requires as a prerequisite for sending troops into war........https://www.fff.org/2018/12/12/i-aint-got-no-quarrel-with-them-russians/

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

i posted the beginning of this previously and identified it as an unknown saved document found in 'my document' file. i have no idea of its origin but it all adds up as quite accurate from what we see daily should we care to look and has great importance for our daily existence;




Politicians influence arrests and prosecutions of friends, relatives and of course their campaign contributors.  Illegal influence is used to both free the guilty and jail the innocent.  Cops and prosecutors look the other way.  Whistle blowing in law enforcement circles doesn’t exist.

If you’re accused of doing something horrible, it doesn’t remove your rights. That’s when such rights are most important. When government can make the decision to kill you without the ability to stand trial or face their accusers, its called tyranny. There will be some who say “Who cares? These guys are terrorists?”, but who decides if you’re a criminal or terrorist?

No-knock raids help those in power control you.  No-knock raids are less about officer safety or preventing evidence from being lost and more about making sure that “consumers” are too scared to resist the Police State. Our government loves to use force and tells us it’s for our own good. The numbers of police officers that are actually concerned about the well being of the general public are declining because they’re being trained to see everyone they come into contact with as a threat rather than a neighbor.

Constitutional protections, including the ban against unreasonable searches and seizures, are ignored with the now ever-present use of “no-knock” warrants. SWAT teams are now routinely used for regular police work, including serving warrants for nonviolent offenses. Raids by SWAT teams, typically carried out in the dead of night, often involve the use of military stun grenades, the wanton destruction of property, killing household pets, and increasingly, the deaths of “suspects” and their family members, including children. More than one hundred such raids take place in America every day.

The militarization of domestic policing is one symptom of a deeply dysfunctional society. While the political establishment never loses the opportunity to declare there’s no money for social needs; education, pensions, health care, nutrition. Billions of dollars are made available to ensure the police have the latest tools of violence.

America looks like a garrison state. The border of the country has been turned into de facto military zones, where constitutional rights don’t exist. Military drones have already appeared in American skies, and plans are in place for their wider use. There’s a determined effort to get you used to police and soldiers armed to the teeth, at airports, train stations, schools, sports stadiums, etc.

Militarized police are part of a massive state apparatus that operates largely outside of any legal or democratic supervision and tramples on the population’s constitutional and democratic rights every day. Domestic policing is increasingly integrated with the NSA spying programs that monitor your movements, communications and intimate personal details. I know you tell yourself about how vanilla you are obeying all laws, of which you are aware, but perhaps you’ve noticed your rulers make mistakes.

The militarization of American society was graphically exposed in the lockdown of Boston after the Marathon bombings, in which the city’s residents were told to “shelter in place” as squads of police in combat fatigues, armed with assault rifles, conducted house-to-house searches.

Americans don’t live in the real world and one day could wake up stunned by reality. If a little boy points his finger and sys “Bang!” he is handcuffed by the police and dragged from school, to be subjected to psychiatry. This in the planet’s most militarily aggressive country, in which said little boy is constantly exposed to war movies and murderous video games. Dodge ball is violence, but join the Marines and be a man.

Government protects us from people who might spy on us, by spying on us. They protect us from violent thugs with cops that perform no-knock SWAT raids on peaceful people. They protect us from thieves and financial collapse by stealing from us to give to the thieves. Now they’ve declared war on Americans to protect us from those who might declare war on us. It’s time to realize that government is the big terrorist.

Law enforcement is a “product” we’re forced to buy, and severely punished through torture, or even by death if we refuse. Since law enforcement operates as a monopoly, rather than through the market, there’s no legitimate mechanism to guide rational distribution of resources, and no way to measure “customer” satisfaction although using the term “customer” in this context is a bit like using the term “girlfriend” to describe a rape victim.

The Nazis valued police competence, so in 1933, almost all of the men who served in the various state police forces under the Weimar Republic stayed on in their jobs. In one of the few places in Germany where most of the Gestapo records survived, every member of the Gestapo was a career policeman or had a police background. Most Gestapo men were not Nazis, but at the same time weren’t opposed to the Nazi regime, which they were willing to serve, in whatever task they were called upon to perform: 80% of all Gestapo investigations were started in response to information provided by denunciations by ordinary Germans.

Prosecutors are rewarded for winning at all costs. They have no incentive to search for truth rather than a conviction, and they’re entirely unaccountable when they pervert justice in pursuit of victory. Don’t believe that your innocence is any protection. The question isn't whether you’ve done anything wrong, but whether the criminal justice system is going to target you and once you’re in that system, you face excessive odds of emerging from it without damage.

Both judges and prosecutors enjoy absolute immunity for their official conduct. They’re not personally liable for their official misconduct, which means that they have no flesh over the fire. Judges, especially those elected to their positions, are almost universally reluctant to force prosecutors to carry out their duty under the Supreme Court’s ruling by providing relevant evidence to the defense. 

When our own government no longer sees us as human beings with dignity and worth but as things to be manipulated, maneuvered, mined for data, manhandled by police, conned into believing it has our best interests at heart, mistreated, and then jails us if we dare step out of line, punishes us unjustly without remorse, and refuses to own up to its failings, we’re no longer operating under a constitutional republic. What we/re experiencing is a tyranny at the hands of a psychopathic government, which operates against the interests of its own people except for favoring certain groups.

Having allowed government to expand and exceed our reach, we find ourselves on the losing end of a tug-of-war over control of our country and our lives. As long as we let them, government officials will continue to trample on our rights, always justifying their actions as being for the good of the people. Yet government can only go as far as “we the people” allow. The problem is that we’ve suspended our consciences in favor of the police state.

The choice before us is that of being a child or a parent, of obeying blindly, never questioning the police state or challenging injustice, standing up to tyranny, and owning up to our responsibilities as citizens, no matter how painful, risky or uncomfortable.

Who can expect people to obey laws that the police refuse to, and when that refusal reaches felony behavior that would land anyone else in jail for decades there should be no surprise when those with few scruples, if any, take advantage of the example they’re set by “law enforcement” to create some mayhem of their own. Cops don’t get magical new powers because they have a blue suit on.  They’re only empowered to act and use force when a law is being violated. Some believe that nobody is entitled to resist police felonies and must put up with them, whether the crime involved is theft, felony assault or even murder.

Always remember, cops worship the State. There’s nothing they won’t do at its command. 9/11 is one of their favorite excuses. They will trample all over the original intent of the constitution if the State tells them that it’s okay. They will lie. They will twist facts. They will put innocent citizens in jail, rather than lose face for their own misdeeds. They will see nothing, hear nothing, and speak nothing, to protect their kind from the very laws they have sworn to uphold. They would rather kill you on a mistake and lie about it with the mindset that their number one priority is to go home safe a night, even if that means an unjustified killing, then claim that their life and safety required a split second guess and they were in fear for their lives, from everyday items.

We no longer speak of peace officers or police departments. They’ve come to be known as law enforcement officers and police forces, by their own preference and usage. Given their tactics, equipment and behavior, the police closely resemble the standing army we’ve rightly feared. Notice they call us “civilians”. Police chose this path because, it creates a clear cut “us and them” relationship with “consumers”, most visible in their routinely botched and often fatal “no knock” home invasions.

The excuses are rarely convincing, as in all things, you are what you do, not what you say. That sort of conduct by armed agents of the State is characteristic of war zones where no rights are recognized, where the preponderance of force is the one and only standard of ownership, where “you’re either one of us or the enemy”. The law-abiding citizen also notices SWAT teams weren’t deployed to take out the looters torching downtown businesses. Yet they’ll do bomb-throwing midnight raids, guns blazing, often for what was once routine process-serving, even when toddlers and other innocents are known to be in the house.
Officers need the citizens; it’s not the other way around, and you can’t get what you want through demands, but only through voluntary cooperation.

Consider North Korea, where the citizens wouldn’t dare to think about organizing protests and demonstrations against governmental policy. They’re considered by the authorities to be model citizens; deferential, orderly, obedient, and loyal, never questioning or challenging in a public way what the authorities are doing.

That’s the mindset of the cops in America. They want people to behave like people do in the military or in North Korea; Deferential, obedient, submissive, and loyal. That’s why cops bark out orders to people as if the cops were drill sergeants. They expect people to obey them, just like privates do in the military.

An unarmed black man is killed by police and automatically, Americans assume, he must have done something to deserve being killed. 130 years after Twain’s masterpiece, Americans still live in a dream world. The media pounce on factoids, did marijuana in Michael Brown’s system cause him to behave erratically? I don’t know, does it make Willie Nelson act erratically?
If you’re poor in America, you don’t stand a chance, if you’re poor and black that goes double. It’s not Black on Black crime; it’s poor on poor crime. No one called the St. Valentine’s Day massacre, Italian on Irish crime. It isn’t racially motivated; it’s economically and geographically motivated crime. It’s seizing whatever opportunity is viable, to rise above poverty in a society precluding legitimate social improvement.


A decade ago we were debating whether non-citizens like “enemy combatants” being held at Guantanamo Bay and Muslim-Americans rounded up in the wake of 9/11, were entitled to protections under the Constitution as they relate to indefinite detention. Americans weren’t overly concerned about the rights of non-citizens then, and now we’re the ones in the unenviable position of being targeted for indefinite detention by “our government”.

A sizeable portion of “consumers” aren’t concerned about government spying on Americans, having been brainwashed into believing that if you’re not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about. It will only be a matter of time before they learn the hard way that in a police state, it doesn’t matter who you are or how righteous you claim to be, eventually, you’ll be lumped in with everyone else and everything you do will be “wrong” and suspect.

Anyone who has been paying attention is aware that we have a growing domestic terrorism problem here in America and I mean our militarized police departments. The FBI defines domestic terrorism: “Domestic terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics: Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law; Appear intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of America.

Indeed, police officers kill more Americans every year than terrorists do. We’re eight times more likely to be killed by a cop than by a “terrorist.” Americans are being terrorized by those who were supposed to protect us from terrorism.


Police like to pretend that their job is to “protect and serve.” It isn’t. Their job is to forcibly control the rest of us in whatever way politicians tell them to. Politicians make up commands; call them laws, and their hired guns, “law enforcers”, hurt any who disobey. Police know this, which is why you will often hear them say things like, “I don’t make the law, I only enforce it,” with the implication being that they aren’t to blame, because they’re just following orders and doing as they’re told.

That excuse was invalid when the Nazis used it, and it’s invalid today. It’s also completely cowardly to deny responsibility for your actions, just because someone else told you to do something. How do you suppose the police would respond to some common thief saying,” don’t blame me for mugging this old lady; someone else told me to”? They would respond exactly how we should respond to it when they use the excuse: You’re responsible for what you do.

The over-funded police in America tend to be a lethal clown posse. The American police state has been a savage enterprise enforcing unpopular or simply bad laws for decades. One determined man gunning for the cops can paralyze an entire state’s law enforcement apparatus and have them running for cover. With few exceptions, even the vaunted thousands of SWAT teams, American police do not encounter talented armed resistance to their predations. For every Dorner incident, there are thousands of Americans savaged and mauled by the cops who offer no resistance whatsoever. Some of these unfortunates go to the hospital for non-crimes like obstructing and resisting arrest. The present vector of violence by the police state will increase and they will start pushing the wrong folks the wrong way. More Americans don’t feel consoled by the presence of police but frightened and concerned for their well-being.

i know some true believers who imagine all their tv and school taught them is true, and they are wrong but you can't find words they will hear to demonstrate that to them, and i imagine the following article wouldn't do either;


The history of the little guy being squashed by massive Chicago political clout at election time is just too long to print without weeping.
But the story for today is so amazing that some Chicago election officials have never seen the like.
“No one can remember anything approaching this,” said an election official.
Really?
It’s overkill of epic proportions, like using a sledgehammer to kill a gnat, or firing off a nuclear weapon to kill a sparrow. A Southwest Side David vs. Goliath story.
The David is David Krupa, 19, a freshman at DePaul University who drives a forklift part time. He’s not a political powerhouse. He’s just a conservative Southwest Side teenager studying political science and economics who got it in his head to run for alderman in a race that pits him against the most powerful ward organization in Chicago.
The Goliath is the 13th Ward Democratic Organization run by House Speaker Michael J. Madigan, aka Boss Madigan, the most powerful politician in the state. Boss Madigan has long hand-picked his aldermen. He likes them loyal and quiet. The current silent alderman of the 13th Ward is Marty Quinn.
“I’m from Clearing,” Krupa told me. “All I want to do is get on the ballot to address the serious issues we have, from public safety to taxes. People don’t want to say things out loud here. People who’ve challenged the 13th Ward get intimidated. You know the neighborhood.”........https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/kass/ct-met-chicago-13th-ward-alderman-race-kass-20181206-story.html
'god's chosen' in a two and a half hour video providing information i suspect you are unaware of;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAps4bwBP4E
the embassy takeover in 79 is the starting point for american citizens awareness of iran and our history there. its like seeing a small bug and concluding it is the entire picture of the world of bugs.
we've got lots of history there most of you are totally unaware of, and the following exploration will provide you with a lot more of that history than you may wish to know, as it will change what you now believe;

The US had a great deal going from 1953 to 1979 with the Shah of Iran.  For 25 years Iran was a cornerstone of the US usurping the British Empire in the Middle East, following World War Two.  Iran was a base for projecting US power in the region, and strategically it bordered the Soviet Union during the Cold War.  
During the early 20th century the British Empire had full control of Iran’s oil industry, and was paying Iran a flat fee for every barrel of oil it extracted.  A rough calculation of Iran’s royalties is between 8% to 16% of the profits, but Iran was never allowed to look at the financial books. [*]  
Prior to the CIA-led 1953 overthrow of the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh, Iran demanded 50% of the profits and control of their oil industry.  That was not unreasonable, but Iran was willing to negotiate. At the time, the US oil companies had a 50/50 profit sharing agreement with Saudi Arabia.
The British refused any negotiated settlement.  It was then that the Iranian parliament led by Mossadegh voted to nationalized Iran’s oil industry.  The British responded with a naval blockade, and began plotting to overthrow Mossadegh and the parliament.  As the Prime Minister, Mossadegh held the most political power in Iran because the people were behind him. The Shah of Iran was mostly a figurehead, at the time. [*]      
President Harry Truman was adamantly against colonialism and sided with Iran, which infuriated the British.  When President Dwight D. Eisenhower took office in 1953, he sided with the British. Eisenhower and Churchill plotted a coup d’état to overthrow Mossadegh.  The frightened Shah, who was in on the plot, fled from Iran before the coup attempt just in case anything went wrong. The first attempt did fail. A second daring CIA-led coup succeeded and the US reinstalled Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as the Shah of Iran, with dictatorial power.     
By its intervention, the US broke the British Empire’s monopoly on Iran’s oil.  That was part of the US’s calculous. After the coup, US oil companies got 40% of Iran’s oil industry, 14% went to Royal Dutch-Shell, 6 % went to the French Petroleum Company, and the British oil company kept 40%.  In addition, Iran got its 50/50 share of the net profits that it wanted in the first place. The US immediately sent financial aid to prop up the Shah, and to bolster Iran’s weakened economy from the British blockade.........https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/69686/the-us-wants-to-bring-back-the-shah-of.html
you may be one of those 'consumers' who lie to yourself about the nature of those who rule you believing your chosen 'party' will stand by the law, and you'd be lying to yourself, as the following exploration will reveal;

Yes, it's true.  It isn't just Democrats going after your guns, America.  Republicans are doing it too, just like Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) warned us earlier this year.  Earlier this year, Rep. Susan Brooks (R-IN) introduced HR 5717, the Jake Laird Act of 2018, which allows for a police officer to confiscate your guns on the grounds that he believes you are "dangerous."
Of course, the bill is unconstitutional on its face, which is why it has been pretty much sitting ignored (until the time is right) in the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
The Second Amendment is clear about the right to keep and bear arms.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The Fourth Amendment is clear as well regarding searches and seizures.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The Fifth Amendment is clear about property being taken without due process of law.
First, let's lay down the law here.No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation..........https://freedomoutpost.com/republican-rep-introduced-minority-report-gun-confiscation-bill/