denninger always has excellent commentary and reinforcing information;

PayPal: ZERO Them AND Their Employees

[Comments enabled]

And no, you don't get to walk it back either fuckheads:

You are independently responsible for complying with all applicable laws in all of your actions related to your use of PayPal's services, regardless of the purpose of the use. In addition, you must adhere to the terms of this Acceptable Use Policy. Violation of this Acceptable Use Policy constitutes a violation of the PayPal User Agreement and may subject you to damages, including liquidated damages of $2,500.00 U.S. dollars per violation, which may be debited directly from your PayPal account(s) as outlined in the User Agreement (see “Restricted Activities and Holds” section of the PayPal User Agreement).

If you have a PayPal account OR ACCEPT THEIR PAYMENT AS A MERCHANT you are consenting to letting them STEAL $2,500 for anything they deem a "violation" without any due process, evidence or proof.

Note that if you linked a bank account they can and will debit the bank account for this and if you keep your account there you're consenting to that.

Now, what constitutes, in part, a "violation" subjecting you to an arbitrary $2,500 fine?

5. involve the sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials that, in PayPal’s sole discretion, (a) are harmful, obscene, harassing, or objectionable, (b) depict or appear to depict nudity, sexual or other intimate activities,7;(c) depict or promote illegal drug use, (d)7;depict or promote7;violence,7; criminal activity, cruelty,7;or self-harm7;(e) depict,7;promote, or incite hatred or discrimination of protected groups or of individuals or groups based on protected characteristics (e.g. race, religion, gender or gender identity, sexual orientation, etc.) (f)7;present a risk to user safety or wellbeing, (g) are fraudulent, promote misinformation, or are unlawful, (h) infringe the privacy, intellectual property rights, or other proprietary rights of any party, or (i)7;are otherwise unfit for publication.

Note that "misinformation" can be anything they so-deem and whatever they determine you are bound by.  So can anything they deem "unfit for publication" which has no objective definition whatsoever.

Such as, for example, "the jabs are harmful."

Or "there are only two genders, male and female."

Or Joe Biden sucks.

Or Hunter Biden either is or was a drug-addled asshole (a true statement in part and a legally-protected opinion in the rest but, in their view, "unfit for publication.").........more........