the joo york times knows how to keep you from disturbing information. just don't acknowledge that it exists which is how they've covered the amnesty report of the realities in palestine;

Bret Stephens, the pro-Israel New York Times columnist, is in an excruciating dilemma. Stephens, who has lived in Israel and edited the right-wing Jerusalem Post, never loses an opportunity to jump to the country’s defense. So when Amnesty International issued its February 1 report charging that Israel is characterized by “apartheid,” Stephens must have fired up his computer to respond.

But then he must have paused — and recognized that in fact the best way the Times could counter Amnesty was to pretend the apartheid finding had never happened. So although he has published two columns since February 1, he hasn’t said anything. He must be grinding his teeth in frustration.

But Stephens is not alone. The New York Times has yet to publish a single word about Amnesty’s landmark report. It is now 18 days, and still nothing has appeared anywhere in the paper about a report that politicians, the State Department and many Jewish groups have gone out of their way to condemn..........read more......