With Damascus and its allies firmly in
control of Syria and its future – the war having been decided on the
ground rather than “politically” as envisioned by Western politicians,
media, and policymakers – the US proxy war against Syria has all but
failed.
Despite the obvious defeat – and as
contemporary American history has illustrated – the US will unlikely
relent and instead, do all within its power to complicate the war’s
conclusion and disrupt desperately needed reconstruction efforts.
Encapsulating current American intentions in Syria is a Foreign Policy article titled, “The New U.N. Envoy to Syria Should Kill the Political Process to Save it.”
The article – written by Julien Barnes-Dacey of the NATO-Soros-funded European Council on Foreign Relations –
suggests the otherwise inevitable end of the conflict be delayed and
that reconstruction aid be held hostage until political concessions are
made with the militarily-defeated foreign-backed militants dislodged
from much of Syria’s territory by joint Syrian-Russian-Iranian-Hezbollah
efforts.
The article makes an unconvincing
argument that maintaining Idlib as a militant bastion, delaying the
conflict’s conclusion, and withholding reconstruction aid will somehow
positively benefit the day-to-day lives of Syrian civilians despite all
evidence suggesting otherwise.
Demands made toward “decentralizing” political
power across Syria seems to be a poorly re-imagined and watered down
version of America’s Balkanization plans rolled out in 2012 when swift
regime change was clearly not possible. The article also indicates
concern over Europe’s potential pivot toward Russia and an abandonment
of European complicity with US regime change efforts.
But what is most striking is the
article’s – and Washington’s insistence that Syria make concessions to a
defeated enemy – funded and armed from abroad and with every intention
of transforming Syria into what Libya has become in the wake of the
US-led NATO intervention there – a fractured failed state overrun by
extremists disinterested and incapable of administering a functioning,
united nation-state.
It is striking because it has been the US who has for over half a century predicated its foreign policy on the age-old adage of “might makes right.” The US – no longer mightiest – now demands concessions despite no leverage to logically compel anyone to make such concessions.
At the Wrong End of “Might Makes Right”............https://journal-neo.org/2019/02/22/us-defeat-in-syria-the-wrong-end-of-might-makes-right/
No comments:
Post a Comment