britain, europe is/are committing suicide;

Several things happened in Britain this month that caught my eye. Straight-A student Courtney Wright, age 12, was sent home from the Bilton School in Warwickshire for wearing a Union Jack dress to school on Culture Celebration Day.

Veils, head coverings, and Kinte cloth were OK, but not the British flag. Students honoring the Welsh dragon or flag of England were also sent home.

This month, the King of England, one of whose titles is “Defender of the Faith,” inaugurated the King Charles III Wing of the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies. Here he is, grinning at representatives of a religion that has a mission to dominate the world. Did he spend 50 years waiting in the wings for this?

In Epping, just north of London, there have been days of protest after an illegal immigrant was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl...........more.......

 globalists meet;

The message was clear. The new world order would be based on European, not American, values. To rally the faithful to the cause, the organizers called upon two of the patron saints of the global elite: Bill and Hillary Clinton. President Clinton was even given an award as “leader of the century.”

The Clintons were clearly in their element. Speaker after speaker denounced Trump and the rise of what they called “autocrats” and “oligarchs.” The irony was crushing. The European Union is based on the oligarchy of a ruling elite. The World Forum even took time to celebrate billionaires from Bill Gates to George Soros for funding “open societies” and greater transnational powers.

The discussions focused on blunting the rise of far-right parties and stemming the flow of “disinformation” that fosters such dissent.

Outside of this rarefied environment, the Orwellian language would border on the humorous: protecting democracy from itself and limiting free speech to foster free speech.

Yet, one aspect of the forum was striking and refreshingly open. This year it became clear why transnational governance gravitates toward greater limits on free speech.

Of course, all of this must be done in the name of democracy and free speech.

There is a coded language that is now in vogue with the anti-free speech community. They never say the word “censorship.” They prefer “content moderation.” They do not call for limiting speech. Instead, they call for limiting “false,” “hateful” or “inciteful” speech.

As for the rise of opposing parties and figures, they are referred to as movements by “low-information voters” misled by disinformation. Of course, it is the government that will decide what are acceptable and unacceptable viewpoints............https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=73212

 there is a formula that those in charge use to manipulate;

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

—Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time

.............watch...............

 fifty three minutes with redacted and a cia defector, whistleblower, on the control levels those in charge have in mind for us. mkultra is involved;

watch...........

 six minutes with the librul hivemind showing clear differences in how states deal with the ice conundrum;

watch.........

 eight minutes with the librul hivemind exploring how somalia became a focus of our elected reps, but how will apaic react to having foreigners steal our solutions and run interference;

watch..........

 twenty five minutes with judge napolitano and ryan dawson with what seems like a better exploration of the epstein game than i've seen so far;

watch.........