i'm thinking of this as a primer plus on false flags and indications of where it leads

In my previous article, Why you should never believe your eyes, we discussed new technologies that make the creation of literal “fake news” more possible than ever. In this follow up we’re going to discuss the potential benefits of faking the news vs creating the news.

A false flag operation is generally defined as ”an act committed with the intent of disguising the actual source of responsibility and pinning blame on another party”

The phrase originates in naval warfare, when ships would literally fly a flag of another nation’s navy.

Historically speaking, they are covert military operations carried out with the aim of creating a cassus belli, either initiating, justifying or perpetuating a war.

The attack is very real, only the flag is false.

But recent years have seen the rise of a new idea – the false false flag. That is to say – entirely fake “events” with only the barest relationship to objective reality. Blanks and crisis actors, fake victims and fake shooters.

This concept has been the subject of discussion recently, with the civil suit against Alex Jones for calling Sandy Hook a “hoax” and the on-going trial of journalist Richard D Hall in the UK for suggesting the Manchester Arena bombing was fake. Similar suggestions have been raised about the Boston bombing of 2013 as well. Others, including Riley Waggaman, have raised questions about the recent “terrorist attack” in Moscow too.

Now, I’m not definitively claiming any or all of those events were faked – though of course they may have been. What I’m pointing up is the shift in discussion........more........

 larry johnson with more assassination adventures;

Based on reports coming out late today, it looks like Chris nailed it. The local police had a three-man SWAT element inside the building where the shooter, who was on the roof, was located. That created some confusion for the counter snipers who were observing the shooter crawling up on the roof. We will have to wait for the communications to be released to know exactly what was said — the counter snipers probably were trying to confirm if the guy they were seeing was part of the group inside the building.

Still, this is a major screw up. There should have been a Rule of Engagement (ROE) in place stipulating that no friendlies would be on the roof. Or, maybe, the SWAT element was supposed to be on the roof and wimped out because of the heat. I stand by my original assertion — this was either major incompetence or something darker.

There is a document circulating on the web, allegedly written by one of the counter sniper’s, claiming he was not given permission to shoot. I have heard from other sources I trust that this is a fabrication. Again, we will have to wait until that man is brought before Congress and testifies under oath. Does not matter, though. Donald Trump is alive and kicking.

Judge Napolitano interrupted his vacation to hold an impromptu roundtable with Ray and me at noon today. We discuss the attempted assassination..........more.........

 ain't this a curious turn of events as ralph cramdon may have one time said;

Channel 11 news uncovered dramatic new details Monday in the moments leading up to the assassination attempt on former president Donald Trump. According to multiple law enforcement sources, Thomas Crooks was spotted by law enforcement on a roof nearly 30 minutes before shots were fired that injured Trump, killed a former fire chief, and injured two others in the crowd.

Channel 11′s Nicole Ford confirmed that Beaver County’s ESU team had eight members at the rally, including snipers and spotters. According to Ford’s sources, one of them noticed a suspicious man on a roof near the rally at 5:45 p.m., called it in and took a picture of the person. We have learned from our sources the person in that picture is Thomas Crooks. We’re told it’s not clear if Crooks had a gun with him at that point.

According to multiple sources, a law enforcement officer had also previously seen Crooks on the ground and called him in as a suspicious person with a picture prior to 5:45 p.m. Our sources tell us an officer checked the grounds for Crooks at that point but did not see him where the first picture was taken. ........more........

 this aught to have been a place to be the fly on the wall;

Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) President Dana White has been a friend with Donald Trump for over 25 years.  When no one believed in the UFC sport, Donald Trump stood with Dana White and used his hotels as venues for the UFC events. They have been close friends ever since.

In this interview Dana White talks about his reaction to the assassination attempt and then an immediate phone call with President Trump after he arrived from the hospital. It’s a little salty. {Direct Rumble Link} WATCH:...........more...........

 i've been reading reports like this for some time. for a while it was old walmarts being so converted, and then during the import of our 'new guests' some were found being used for said guests. i'd venture a guess, that this will be so, depending on which segment of the waring political monsters 'win' in november. i'd suspect that the way the world is heading virtually anything is possible. this author says don't use google, which is a solid recommendation for too many reasons to list. i was using duckduckgo until in recent times they demonstrated reasons not to so now i've been using presearch. there are many but several ride on the back of google;

Dial it back to 2016, when every Democrat in America thought Hillary “Hitlery” Clinton had the election in the bag. The fake news media complex was already beginning to cast Donald J. Trump as a racist, misogynist, white supremacist, all-immigrant-hating rich white casino guy who would destroy democracy and ruin the economy. Bernie “Commie”Sanders even got cheated out of the Democratic nomination process, in the rigged primaries, scammed by the Associated Press and the DNC (Demoncrats of Nefarious Criminals). They even admitted it afterward. 

After “The Donald” won, fair and square, the Dems blamed Russia. It was all over the news, splattered on every liberal newspaper in the country (that’s just about all of them), covered every hour by every presstitute news pundit, and spewed daily from the mouths of Hillary, Oprah and every other Hollywood bought-and-sold celebrity. Four years. Four years this went on. Complete and utter ELECTION DENIALISM to the hilt. The “lib-tards” had massive temper tantrums, talking about moving out of the country (which none of them ever did), and spastic mental breakdowns that are now infamously known as “Trump Derangement Syndrome.”

Nobody got accused of a crime. Nobody had to go to court over it. The FBI did NOT question anyone ever about this election denialism. Nobody went to jail for “election denialism,” or got sued for every penny they are worth (and then some) and nobody, literally NOONE served even one single minute in jail or prison for it. Four years, folks. For four long years, conservatives just took the abuse and complaining because — that’s what you do when you lose.

Dial it forward, to right now, in America, and the Democrats are getting ready to jail about a million times more conservatives than they already have languishing in DC gulags, and all for the upcoming election steal that they KNOW will create millions of election-denying “insurrectionists” and “domestic terrorists” and “far-right-wing extremists.”.........more..........

 denial isn't just a river in egypt. its in our face as the zionist controlled 'free press' refuses to address reality. you doubt my assertion of zionist control? research who owns the largest portion of said media around the world. soros and murdoch are two powerhouses that immediately come to mind. both joos, and there's more if you bother to look;

As one credible source after another confirms that Israel is carrying out a genocide against the Palestinians, we find ourselves living through a mass, public genocide denial.

At the end of February, Michael Fakhri, the UN special rapporteur on the right to food, denounced Israel’s forced starvation of Palestinians in Gaza and said, “In my view as a UN human rights expert, this is now a situation of genocide.”

A month later, Francesca Albanese, special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, concluded that “there are reasonable grounds to believe that the threshold indicating Israel’s commission of genocide is met.”

On Nakba Day, 15 May, the University Network for Human Rights (UNHR) released a report it had written with the International Human Rights Clinic at Boston University School of Law, the International Human Rights Clinic at Cornell Law School, the Center for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria, and the Lowenstein Human Rights Project at Yale Law School. The document shows in scrupulous detail that Israel has carried out a genocide in Gaza and is continuing to do so.

Even as this evidence accumulates, genocide denial has rarely, if ever, been so socially acceptable. Denying a well-documented genocide ordinarily discredits people, leaving them banished from respectable society and widely discredited.

Yet denying Israel’s genocide against Palestinians carries no significant social cost.

For example, soon after Fakhri’s remarks, Jonah Goldberg took to the Los Angeles Times to assure readers that Israel’s actions do not “amount to genocide.”

Rather than engage with the proof that Israel is committing genocide, Goldberg blames “the claim that Israeli policy toward Palestinians is racist and genocidal” on “Soviet propaganda,” Holocaust denial and Vladimir Putin..........more..........

 the empire's insane rush to ww3 continues for a war that they will have little chance of prevailing in for a bushel of reasons leaving nukes as their final exam;

NATO’s three-day summit in Washington DC achieved the objective for which it was designed, to create a public forum in which all 32 members of the Alliance could express their unanimous support for upcoming attacks on the Russian Federation. That was the real purpose of the confab. The managers of the event, sought a dramatic display of unity to justify future hostilities with Moscow and to reduce the possibility that any one person would be held responsible for starting World War 3.

The summit was followed by the release of a formal Declaration which strongly suggests that the decision to go war has already been made. As many people know, NATO has green-lighted a policy that allows the firing of missiles at targets inside Russian territory. This policy will also apply to the numerous NATO F-16s that will be deployed to Ukraine sometime in the near future. (F-16s can carry nuclear missiles) Despite overwhelming support for these policies among the members, we must not forget that these are blatant acts of aggression that are forbidden under international law. No amount of public relations hoopla can conceal the fact that NATO is on-track to commit the “supreme crime”.

It’s worth noting, that NATO intends to take a more active role in the conduct of the war. According to National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, the Alliance plans to formally establish a NATO office inside Ukraine that will be used to oversee military operations. In short, the managers of the conflict no longer have any interest in concealing their involvement. This is now a NATO operation. Here’s an excerpt from an article at the World Socialist Web Site:.........more........