mr hornberger presents a notice that there are spears coming our way, or at least that is what a court is fearful about;

For people who still have fears about the threat of a violent takeover of the federal government, a ruling by Washington, D.C., federal Judge Royce C. Lamberth has gone a long way to relieve such fears. In a decision denying bail to one of the January 6 protestors, Jacob Anthony Chansley, who is often referred to as the “QAnon Shaman,” Lamberth no doubt succeeded in calming the fears of Washington lawmakers and members of the mainstream press who remain convinced that there was a serious danger posed by the January 6 “insurrectionists,” “revolutionaries,” “insurgents,” “rebels,” “terrorists,” “traitors,” “overthrowers,” and “rioters” who were supposedly attempting to violently take over the reins of the federal government.

One of the most fascinating aspects of this phenomenon is the weapon that Chansley chose to lead the charge to take over the Capitol. He used a spear, a weapon so dangerous that Lamberth cited it as one of the principal reasons that he was denying pretrial bail to Chansley.

A spear? Yes, a spear! What could be more dangerous than that? No, don’t say an AR-15 or a Glock 19. Those weapons run the risk of malfunctioning or misfiring. Moreover, unless a person is highly trained in the use of firearms, one runs the definite risk of missing the target when firing.

A spear is obviously a much more effective weapon to employ when trying to violently overthrow a government. A spear doesn’t lock up and misfire. And it’s virtually impossible to miss with a spear. Moreover, its history as a weapon goes back a lot further than the history of guns.

Good for Lamberth in understanding the gravity of the threat that Chansley posed to America and continues to pose to America with his spear. Good for him for keeping him in jail pending his trial. Why let that pesky bail requirement in the Bill of Rights endanger the American people with the possibility of more spear attacks?

In fact, what I found surprising about Lamberth’s decision is that he seems to have failed to note a much more dangerous weapon that Chansley was using during his attempt to conquer the U.S. government. Horns. Yes, horns! He’s the guy who had his  face covered with war paint (which is scary in and of itself) and was wearing bull horns on his head.

Just think what he could have done. He could have simply lowered his head and charged members of Congress, Capitol guards, and National Guard troops with his horns. Just think how many bullfighters have been hurt or even killed in the bullring in that way? How could Lamberth have missed the grave danger posed by Chansley’s horns?

In any event, thank goodness for our federal judiciary in our nation’s capital. Thank goodness they are keeping us safe by keeping people in jail pending the outcome of their trial..........https://www.fff.org/2021/03/11/what-next-spear-control/

pcr clear about the lies we're told and who sells them, in a short essay; 

Normalizing Deceit

Paul Craig Roberts

Here is the media’s uniform misrepresentation of a nonevent—“the white supremacist insurrection” at the Capitol:

“Years of white supremacy threats culminated in Capitol riots,” Associated Press, January 14, 2021

“White supremacist extremists are the nation’s deadliest terror threat,” Los Angeles Times, January 16, 2021

“The Capitol attack was White supremacy, plain and simple,” CNN, January 10, 2021

“White Riot,” New York Times, January 13, 2021

“The seditionists made clear what their attack was about: White supremacy,” Washington Post, January 15, 2021

“What the Capitol Insurgency Reveals about White Supremacy and Law Enforcement,” Brookings Institution, January 12, 2021

“The Capitol Riot Was an Attack on Multiracial Democracy,” Atlantic, January 7, 2021.

“Insurrection Day: When White Supremacist Terror Came to the US Capitol,” Guardian, January 9, 2021.

(Source: https://www.unz.com/article/the-white-supremacist-armed-insurrection-lives-on/)

When the media lies like this, the media normalizes deceit, and the word “liar” loses its sting. Lying becomes part of the New Normal.

When government lies as well—Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, Assyd’s use of chemical weapons, Iranian nukes, Russian invasions, Russiagate—lying becomes ubiquitous.  Truth becomes so discordant that truth is discarded.  

Truth-tellers become dissident “conspiracy theorists” who are guilty of trying to shake the population’s confidence in the ruling lies.  They are censored, and if they persist they risk becoming labeled “domestic terrorists” and “enemies of democracy.”  Orwell’s 1984 is our reality.

Newspeak is used to restrict grammar and limit vocabulary in order to diminish the range of thought and communication. Thus, gender terms become impermissible, and language cannot be used to identify gender. The Democrat House has even passed House rules to this effect. A granddaughter is a grand-sibling, a stepbrother is a step-sibling, terms that obviously convey far less information. 

The feminization of university life and society in general results in feelings replacing reason, bringing an end to independent thought, which is confrontational.  “Tone” becomes more important than content.  With math and physics demonized as tools of white racism, society is on its way back to the dark ages.  (See  https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/blog/an-unleashed-feminine-mystique-is-destroying-higher-education/ )........https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/03/11/normalizing-deceit/

 i'm only part way into this article and know i have to post it here;

By Lawrence Davidson

Misuse of anti-Semitism

When it comes to anti-Semitism, the Israelis and their Zionist supporters are so deceitful that they risk the moral degradation of Judaism. How do these two things, deceitfulness and the moral degradation, that is the deterioration of ethical standards, go together in this case? 

First, the Zionists are deceitful because they purposely conflate Zionism, which is an ethnocentric political ideology adhered to by a subset of Jews, with Judaism, a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural religion. Then they insist that Israel’s allies – particularly the United States – adhere to this same propagandistic conflation.

Second, this deliberately instigated error is an attempt to stave off criticism of the Israeli state and its policies towards the Palestinians. Those policies are harsh and include segregation, ethnic cleansing and other apartheid-style acts of discrimination. By insisting that (1) the political ideology that promotes and rationalises this behaviour is an expression of the religion of Judaism and therefore (2) criticism of these policies is the equivalent of anti-Semitism, the Zionists insist that Israeli state behaviour is sanctified by the religion. This is a direct attack on the ethical standards of Judaism, hence the moral degradation. The tactic also undermines the gravity of the charge of anti-Semitism due to chronic misapplication by the Zionists.

Saturday Night Live tells a joke

Let’s take a look at the background of this situation.

First, the sad truth is that Israeli state policies result in racist behaviour towards the Palestinians. .........read more.........

 he said this so many years ago and these days its many times more accurate;

"The greatest danger of Jewish power lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government." -- Charles A. Lindbergh, Jr.

 like the meme says: prove me wrong;

 those of you  who support putting cops in schools aught to read and watch this;

Douglas County, CO — Utterly heart-breaking video was released this week as part of a federal lawsuit, accusing Douglas County school and sheriff’s officials of “aggressively” handcuffing a child with autism and locking him up after he poked a classmate with a pencil. The pencil poke was in response to that student writing on him with a marker and the teacher failing to stop it.

The incident unfolded on Aug. 29, 2020 after deputies decided to arrest the child known as A.V. in the lawsuit.

According to A.V.’s mother, Michell Hanson, the student who wrote on her son has a history of giving A.V. a hard time. He writes on A.V’s arm with markers and then tries to write on his clothes, according to Hanson. A.V. tries to stick up for himself and his friend and he asks several times for the student to stop, but they continue and the aide never intervenes. That’s when A.V. pokes him twice with his pencil. The student was reportedly uninjured.

According to the lawsuit, filed by the ACLU:............read and watch more......

 brother nathanael speaks about our current situation with a video of joe you may find curious;

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=229380